Racial and ethnic disparities in SSRI availability in substance abuse treatment

OBJECTIVE: The high rate of co-occurrence of psychiatric and substance use disorders suggests that specialty substance abuse treatment facilities may be an important site for the delivery of psychotropic medications. However, the literature suggests there may be associations between the percentage of racial and ethnic minority clients and the availability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in these facilities. METHODS: Survey data from the National Treatment Center Study, comprising nationally representative samples of 326 publicly funded and 339 privately funded substance abuse treatment centers, were used to measure the availability of SSRI medications from 2002 to 2004. Independent variables included the percentages of African-American and Hispanic clients, center type, organizational affiliation, region, size, accreditation status, presence of an integrated care program, and physician availability. RESULTS: SSRIs were available in 48% of the centers. Logistic regression analysis indicated that greater minority representation in centers' caseloads was negatively associated with the availability of SSRIs. The association between the percentage of African-American clients and SSRI availability was fully mediated by the addition of factors related to treatment inputs, such as the presence of a physician on staff or contract and the presence of an integrated care program. With organizational and treatment characteristics factored out, there was a negative association between the percentage of Hispanic clients and the availability of SSRIs. CONCLUSIONS: Although SSRIs were available in nearly half of these substance abuse treatment settings, racial and ethnic disparities exist in the availability of these medications.     

Lack of long-term benefits of a 6-month heart failure disease management program

BackgroundHeart failure (HF) represents a major burden on the health care system, causing repeated hospitalizations and numerous emergency department (ED) visits. In a 6-month randomized study of a multidisciplinary HF clinic, we have previously shown decreased hospital readmissions and improved quality of life. Despite these encouraging results, it is unknown if these beneficial effects are sustained.Methods and ResultsTo assess long-term recurrent ED visits, readmissions, and mortality among HF patients who were discharged after a 6-month intensive HF management program (HFMP). Of the 230 subjects (New York Heart Association Class II-IV) who were initially randomized to standard follow-up care or to a HFMP for 6 months, 190 were studied retrospectively for long-term evaluation. Long-term data was obtained from the Quebec administrative health databases. We compared the intervention and control groups for the number of recurrent ED visits, hospital readmissions, and all-cause deaths. After a mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 1.7 years, there was no difference in the composite end point of all-cause death, hospital admissions, and ED visits between those patients initially in the HFMP group and the controls. After multivariable adjustment, there was no difference in the composite primary endpoint (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.75–1.37) or in the secondary end point of all-cause death alone (HR 1.09, 95%CI:0.69–1.72) between those initially assigned to the HF clinic and those receiving usual care.ConclusionsFor severely ill patients, the clinical and resource benefits of a 6-month HFMP are not sustained upon program cessation. Further research into the benefits of long-term HFMP is required.     

Family quality of life in dementia: a qualitative approach to family-identified care priorities

Objective  

To characterize factors contributing to quality of life (QOL) in families providing care to people with dementia.