Is Gd-DTPA required for routine cranial MR imaging?

Gadopentetate dimeglumine (gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [DTPA]) was administered prospectively to 500 consecutive children and adults referred for routine cranial magnetic resonance (MR) imaging over a 4-month period. Pre- and postcontrast images were blindly and independently interpreted by two experienced neuroradiologists. Specific criteria were provided to the readers to define objectively when contrast material enhancement (or lack thereof) would be considered "radiologically helpful." Contrast-enhancing lesions were observed in 99 cases (20%). In only 15 cases (3%) did Gd-DTPA permit detection of lesions not also apparent on the precontrast studies. Contrast enhancement was considered radiologically helpful in 74 of the 99 cases. Lack of enhancement was considered helpful in 112 of the 500 cases (22%). Factors that may indicate increased usefulness of Gd-DTPA include increased patient age, definite lesion seen at computed tomography or precontrast MR imaging, prior craniotomy for tumor, and clinically documented systemic or central nervous system disease. Gd-DTPA should probably be used routinely for cranial MR imaging in most patients, except, perhaps, children and young adults with normal precontrast images.     

Polyoma virus and simian virus 40 as cancer models: History and perspectives

Polyoma virus and SV40 are the founding members of the Polyomaviridae. They are small viruses, with a genome consisting of around 5.3 kbases of closed circular, double-stranded DNA. This simplicity, the ease with which they can be grown, and their capacity to cause cancers in newborn rodents has made them popular models for studying the molecular basis of cancer formation. As a consequence, many of the underlying principles involved in tumorigenesis have been uncovered during the study of these viruses. For instance, the discovery of p53, Rb protein function, tyrosine kinases and PI3 kinases were all made when examining polyoma virus and SV40. Here we review how these discoveries were made, and the influence they have had on our understanding of cancer development.     

The effect of inhaled tiotropium bromide on lung mucociliary clearance in patients with COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of tiotropium on lung mucociliary clearance in COPD. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Outpatients of an urban-area university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-four patients with COPD aged 40 to 75 years classified equally into two groups. INTERVENTION: Single (18 microg) daily dose of tiotropium inhalation capsules or of placebo for 21 days. METHODS: Six-hour tracheobronchial clearance of inhaled 99mTc-labeled polystyrene particles using a 48-h retention measurement to determine the "nontracheobronchial" deposition fraction. RESULTS: Test radioaerosol penetration into the lungs increased significantly (p < 0.003) as did FEV1 (p < 0.006) in the tiotropium-treated patients, but measured mucociliary clearance was not significantly changed despite the increased pathway length for clearance (mean +/- SE area under the tracheobronchial retention curve changed from 442 +/- 22 to 453 +/- 20%/h). Smaller (nonsignificant) decreases of radioaerosol penetration and FEV1 occurred in the placebo group together with a small (nonsignificant) decrease in the area under the retention curve. CONCLUSION: Twenty-one days of inhaled tiotropium, 18 microg/d, as a dry powder does not retard mucus clearance from the lungs.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications following the posterior and lateral surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty

IntroductionTotal hip arthroplasty is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Despite this, medical evidence to inform the choice of surgical approach is lacking. Currently in the UK, the two most frequently performed approaches to the hip are the posterior and the direct lateral.MethodsThis systematic review was performed according to Cochrane guidelines following an extensive search for prospective controlled trials published in any language before January 2014. Of the 728 records identified from searches, 6 prospective studies (including 3 randomised controlled trials) involving 517 participants provided data towards this review.FindingsCompared with the lateral approach, the posterior approach conferred a significant reduction in the risk of Trendelenburg gait (odds ratio [OR]: 0.31, p=0.0002) and stem malposition (OR: 0.24, p=0.02), and a non-significant reduction in dislocation (OR: 0.37, p=0.16) and heterotopic ossification (OR: 0.41, p=0.13). Neither approach conferred a functional advantage. We draw attention to the paucity of evidence and the need for a further randomised trial.     

Inconsistent reporting of minimally invasive surgery errors

Introduction

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a complex task requiring dexterity and high level cognitive function. Unlike surgical ‘never events’, potentially important (and frequent) manual or cognitive slips (‘technical errors’) are underresearched. Little is known about the occurrence of routine errors in MIS, their relationship to patient outcome, and whether they are reported accurately and/or consistently.

Methods

An electronic survey was sent to all members of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, gathering demographic information, experience and reporting of MIS errors, and a rating of factors affecting error prevalence.

Results

Of 249 responses, 203 completed more than 80% of the questions regarding the surgery they had performed in the preceding 12 months. Of these, 47% reported a significant error in their own performance and 75% were aware of a colleague experiencing error. Technical skill, knowledge, situational awareness and decision making were all identified as particularly important for avoiding errors in MIS. Reporting of errors was variable: 15% did not necessarily report an intraoperative error to a patient while 50% did not consistently report at an institutional level. Critically, 12% of surgeons were unaware of the procedure for reporting a technical error and 59% felt guidance is needed. Overall, 40% believed a confidential reporting system would increase their likelihood of reporting an error.

Conclusion

These data indicate inconsistent reporting of operative errors, and highlight the need to better understand how and why technical errors occur in MIS. A confidential ‘no blame’ reporting system might help improve patient outcomes and avoid a closed culture that can undermine public confidence.