Fostering Children's Participation in Disaster Risk Reduction Through Play:A Case Study of LEGO and Minecraft

This article focuses on children's participation in disaster risk reduction.It draws on a 2018 study done in New Zealand with 33 school children who conducted p...     

Outcome of the frozen elephant trunk procedure as a redo operation

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThe goal of this study was to determine the outcome of patients undergoing an elective frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure as a redo operation following previous cardiac surgery.METHODSOne hundred and eighteen consecutive patients underwent FET procedures between October 2010 and October 2019 at our centre. Patients were registered in a dedicated database and analysed retrospectively. Clinical and follow-up characteristics were compared between patients undergoing a FET operation as a primary (primary group) or a redo procedure (redo group) using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis. Emergency procedures (n = 33) were excluded from the analysis.RESULTSA total of 36.5% (n = 31) of the FET procedures were redo operations (redo group) and 63.5% (n = 54) of the patients underwent primary surgery (primary group). There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality [primary group: 7.4%; redo group: 3.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.19–35.29); P = 0.63] and the 3-year mortality [primary group: 22.2%; redo group: 16.7%; 95% CI (0.23–3.23); P = 0.72] between redo and primary cases. Furthermore, the adjusted statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between the groups in the occurrence of transient or permanent neurological deficit, paraplegia, acute renal failure and resternotomy. The redo group showed a higher rate of recurrent nerve palsy, which did not reach statistical significance [primary group: 3.7% (n = 2); redo group: 19.4% (n = 6); P = 0.091].CONCLUSIONSElective FET procedures as redo operations performed by a dedicated aortic team following previous cardiac surgery demonstrate an adequate safety profile.     

小鼠皮肤超氧化物歧化酶活性与枸杞多糖的干预

目的:观察枸杞多糖对皮肤胶原代谢和自由基产生的影响,探讨其抗皮肤衰老的作用。方法:实验于2005-06/2006-05在广东医学院整形外科研究所完成。①实验材料:清洁级昆明小鼠60只,月龄2个月,体质量16～24g,雌雄各半。②实验分组:将小鼠随机分为正常对照组、衰老模型组和抗衰老模型组,每组20只。③实验干预:模型组每日用D-半乳糖溶液皮下注射制造衰老模型,用量和时间为80mg/(kg·d)7d,120mg/(kg·d)14d,140mg/(kg·d)14d,180mg/(kg·d)7d。正常对照组每日注射同体积的生理盐水。抗衰老模型组在注射D-半乳糖期间以枸杞多糖灌胃,剂量为20mg/(kg·d),正常对照组和衰老组则以同体积的生理盐水代之灌胃。④实验评估:42d后切取小鼠颈背部皮肤,测定超氧化物歧化酶活力、羟脯氨酸和丙二醛含量。结果:56只小鼠进入结果分析(4只死亡)。①小鼠皮肤超氧化物歧化酶活力:与正常对照组相比,衰老组和抗衰老组小鼠皮肤超氧化物歧化酶活力降低,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01);抗衰老组与衰老模型组比较,超氧化物歧化酶活力增加,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01)。②与正常对照组相比,衰老组和抗衰老组小鼠皮肤羟脯氨酸和丙二醛含量增加,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01);抗衰老组与衰老组比较,羟脯氨酸和丙二醛含量均降低,差异有显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:枸杞多糖改善皮肤老化的作用与提高小鼠皮肤超氧化物歧化酶活力,降低羟脯氨酸、丙二醛含量,影响胶原代谢有关。     

白藜芦醇对一次性力竭游泳大鼠肝脏组织保护作用的量效关系

目的:观察白藜芦醇对一次性力竭游泳大鼠肝脏组织的作用及发挥作用的最佳口服剂量。方法:实验于2006-05/07在成都体育学院运动医学系动物实验室完成。①实验分组:选取雄性SD大鼠70只,随机分为7组,每组10只,分别为安静对照组,运动对照组,运动 15mg/kg白藜芦醇组,运动 50mg/kg白藜芦醇组,运动 100mg/kg白藜芦醇组,运动 200mg/kg白藜芦醇组,运动 300mg/kg白藜芦醇组。②实验干预:不同剂量白藜芦醇组每天灌胃15,50,100,200,300mg/kg白藜芦醇,安静对照组和运动对照组分别灌胃相同体积的溶媒(二甲亚砜 生理盐水),连续5周。末次给予实验用样品1h后,各运动组每只鼠尾跟部负荷3%体质量铅皮,置于水深50cm、水温(31±1)℃游泳槽中游泳。游泳力竭后即刻,股动脉取血并迅速取出肝组织。③指标检测:赖氏比色法测定血清中谷丙转氨酶活性;邻苯三酚自氧化法测定肝组织超氧化物歧化酶活性;硫代巴比妥酸法测定肝组织丙二醛含量。结果:纳入动物70只,均进入结果分析。①血清谷丙转氨酶活性和肝组织中丙二醛含量:运动对照组显著高于安静对照组,不同剂量白藜芦醇组低于运动对照组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。运动 100,200,300mg/kg白藜芦醇组低于运动 15,50mg/kg白藜芦醇组[谷丙转氨酶活性:(972.36±121.86),(944.36±105.35),(888.34±88.68),(1773.52±89.35),(1377.78±27.01)nkat/L,P<0.01;丙二醛含量:(7.90±2.56),(7.69±3.69),(7.13±2.62),(19.90±2.21),(12.16±1.78)μmol/g,P<0.05]。100,200,300mg/kg白藜芦醇组间差异无显著性。②肝脏组织中超氧化物歧化酶活性:运动对照组显著低于安静对照组,不同剂量白藜芦醇组高于运动对照组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。运动 100,200,300mg/kg白藜芦醇组高于15,50mg/kg白藜芦醇组[(2325.80±163.37),(2379.14±121.86),(2447.16±89.18),(1096.05±120.19),(1514.64±28.17)μkat/g,P<0.01]。结论:①白藜芦醇对力竭性运动大鼠肝脏组织具有保护作用。②100,200,300mg/kg白藜芦醇对肝脏组织发挥保护作用效果优于15,50mg/kg,建议使用100mg/kg白藜芦醇就能达到理想效果。     

Minimal important differences in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version 2.1

To propose minimal important differences (MID) for the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ v2.1). To our knowledge (to date), no published MID values exist for the MSQ v2.1 in any population. Analyses were performed on data from two pivotal clinical trials of topiramate for migraine prevention ( n  = 916), as well as from the QualityMetric National Headache Survey ( n  = 1016). Analyses included both distribution- and anchor-based MID techniques as well as group- and individual-level MID values. Group-level anchor-based MID values ranged from 3.2 [Role Restrictive domain (RR)] to 7.5 [Emotional Functioning domain (EF)], setting the minimum level of appropriate MID (which can also aid with power analysis). Individual-level distribution-based MID values resulted in highly similar estimates from two large databases: median MID of 8.5 for RR, 9.2 for Role Preventive (RP) and 12.0 for EF. Finally, individual-level anchor-based MID values ranged from 5.0 (RR and RP domains) to 10.6 (EF). For group-level purposes of calculating power for future studies, an MID of 3.2, 4.6 and 7.5 for RR, RP and EF is recommended. For within-group analyses for analysing clinical trial efficacy of each patient's change with responder analyses, 5 points is necessary for RR. For RP and EF, ranges are recommended: 5.0 to 7.9 for RP and 8.0 to 10.6 for EF. These latter two domains tend to have more error in the MID, and thus a sensitivity analysis with both ends of the range should be used to confirm significant differences in responder analyses.     

Is phenytoin contraindicated in patients receiving cranial irradiation ?

Three recent publications have reported the development of erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome in patients receiving cranial irradiation and sodium phenytoin. Some authors have recommended that patients receiving whole brain radiation therapy and who have had seizures should not be prescribed phenytoin but an alternative anticonvulsant. This article reviews the current literature pertaining to the development of this potentially lethal complication in patients receiving whole brain radiation and phenytoin, with reference to the single recorded case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome in a patient receiving cranial irradiation and phenytoin in Auckland, New Zealand. While the clinical picture in the 16 patients reported in the literature and the current case report differed from the classical form of erythema multiforme, a similar pattern of presentation and outcome appeared in all patients reviewed, suggesting that the combination of phenytoin, cranial irradiation and the gradual reduction of concomitant steroids seem to lead to the development of erythema multiforme and/or Stevens-Johnson syndrome. The data presented, although sparse, suggest that phenytoin should not be prescribed in patients receiving cranial irradiation.