Cow's Milk Exposure and Asthma in a Newborn Cohort: Repeated Ascertainment Indicates Reverse Causation

The effect of cow's milk consumption on childhood asthma has been debated for several years. This study attempts to provide further insight into this association through the use of a longitudinal study design. Newborns from parents with atopic history were recruited from Germany, Austria, and England (n = 696). For five repeated ascertainments, information was collected on cow's milk exposure, incidence of doctor-diagnosed asthma, and confounders. Generalized estimation equations, incorporating different models (concurrent, delayed, combined, and reverse causation), were used to determine this association. No association between cow's milk consumption and childhood asthma was found for the concurrent effects model (OR = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.20). In the delayed effects model, the direction of the association varied with time of follow-up. Thus, we stratified by period, which resulted in a significant protective delayed effect at 36 months (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.49). However, reverse causation negated this finding since the presence of asthma in prior months led to a reduction in further exposure to cow's milk (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.16, 0.99). Hence, cow's milk consumption does not protect against childhood asthma. The apparent protection of cow's milk against asthma may result from parents of asthmatic children avoiding cow's milk, rather than actual prophylaxis.     

An adjusted version of Kohlberg's moral theory: discussion of its validity for research in nursing ethics

Critics of Kohlberg's moral theory today focus on the content of his theory and more specifically on its justice-orientated moral concept. This has led to the well-known 'justice-care debate'. The purpose of this article is to critically examine the validity of Kohlberg's moral theory for research in nursing ethics from a caring perspective (referring to the content) as well as from a cognitive-structural perspective (referring to the basic assumptions of the model). The analysis points to the usefulness and value of the cognitive-structural model to empirically study nurses' ethical behaviour; the content of Kohlberg's model, however, needs to be adapted by adding a caring perspective as well as some personal and situational variables. An adjusted version of Kohlberg's model is proposed and discussed.     

Genotypic selection of mutated DNA sequences using mismatch cleavage analysis, a possible basis for novel mutation assays

A novel technique for the selection of mutated DNA sequences,termed mismatch cleavage-polymerase chain reaction (MC-PCR),is proposed. The method is based on hybridizing genomic DNAwith a suitable probe, several 100 bp long. Mutated DNA sequenceswill form mismatched heteroduplexes which are cleaved by usingresolvases. Cleaved heteroduplexes are detected by ligationto an oligonucleotide adaptor and then amplified by using PCR.If practical, this technique would have considerable advantagesover the restriction site mutation (RSM) method. Failure toachieve cleavage efficiencies of close to 100% will not compromisesuccess. This is because positive signals (PCR amplification)arise from cleaved mutated sites and not, as in RSM, from DNAsequences resistant to cleavage by restriction endonucleases.Furthermore, the mutational target is much larger than in RSM.It would be possible to screen stretches of DNA several 100bp in length for mutations. Any mutation, independent of itslocation, could be identified. The usefulness of MC-PCR forthe genotypic selection of mutants will depend on the effectivenesswith which a small number of mismatched heteroduplexes can berecognized, cleaved and ligated. ¹To whom correspondence should be addressed