Drug-Silica Coassembled Particles Improve Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to assess the antimicrobial activity and flow of root canal sealers after incorporating novel highly loaded antimicrobial drug-silica coassembled particles (DSPs).MethodsDSPs were synthesized through coassembly of silica and octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) antimicrobial surfactant. DSPs were loaded (1% and 2% wt) into epoxy resin sealer (AH Plus [AH]; Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) or calcium silicate–based sealer (EndoSequence Bioceramic Sealer (BC); Brasseler, Savannah, GA). OCT release from DSP-modified sealers was determined using liquid chromatography. Antimicrobial activity of sealers against planktonic or biofilm form Enterococcus faecalis was assessed using direct contact and membrane restricted tests. Sealer flow was tested according to ISO6876:2012.ResultsOCT release from BC + 1% or 2% DSPs was above the minimum inhibitory concentration following 2 days throughout the 30-day experiment, whereas OCT release from AH + 1% or 2% DSP was significantly below the minimum inhibitory concentration against E. faecalis (4 μg/mL) over the whole 30-day experimental period. All materials (with or without DSPs) killed planktonic bacteria initially. AH ± 1% or 2% DSPs had no antimicrobial activity after 7 days. BC + 1% or 2% DSPs maintained antibacterial activity over the 30-day period. Both modified and unmodified sealers completely inhibited the growth of E. faecalis biofilms after 24 hours of contact. DSPs decreased the flow of AH and BC sealers; for AH, the reduction was proportional to the amount of DSPs added. All modified and unmodified sealers, except for AH + 2% DSPs, were within the acceptable limits of ISO 6876 flow tests.ConclusionsDSPs enhanced the antimicrobial performance of BC but not AH, whereas the material’s flow remained compliant with ISO 6876 standards. Depending on the sealer, DSPs may enhance antimicrobial efficacy in root canal treatment and potentially improve treatment outcome.     

Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics

Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders is now clearly on the horizon. This new technology offers obvious clinical benefits such as safe testing early in pregnancy. Before widespread implementation, it is important to consider the possible ethical implications. Four hypothetical scenarios are presented that highlight how ethical ideals of respect for autonomy, privacy and fairness may come into play when offering non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders. The first scenario illustrates the moral case for using these tests for ‘information only'', identifying a potential conflict between larger numbers of women seeking the benefits of the test and the wider social impact of funding tests that do not offer immediate clinical benefit. The second scenario shows how the simplicity and safety of non-invasive prenatal testing could lead to more autonomous decision-making and, conversely, how this could also lead to increased pressure on women to take up testing. In the third scenario we show how, unless strong safeguards are put in place, offering non-invasive prenatal testing could be subject to routinisation with informed consent undermined and that woman who are newly diagnosed as carriers may be particularly vulnerable. The final scenario introduces the possibility of a conflict of the moral rights of a woman and her partner through testing for single gene disorders. This analysis informs our understanding of the potential impacts of non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders on clinical practice and has implications for future policy and guidelines for prenatal care.     

HHV-6 cell receptor CD46 expression on various cell subsets of six blood and graft sources: A prospective series

BackgroundCord Blood (CB) are increasingly used as an alternative stem cells source in adults for allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT). The risk of human herpesvirus (HHV-6) reactivation is significantly higher after CB transplant vs unrelated peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) allo-SCT. Higher HHV-6 cell receptor CD46 expression on progenitor cells in CB may explain this difference.ObjectivesTo prospectively compare the HHV-6 cell receptor CD46 expression on various cell subsets of three freshly harvested blood sources on one hand and of three graft sources on the other hand.Study design52 samples were used for the purpose of this study. They were issued from peripheral blood (PB, n = 10), G-CSF mobilised PB (GCSF-PB, n = 10), cord blood (CB, n = 10), unmanipulated bone marrow (uBM, n = 5), leukapheresis product (LP, n = 10) and thawed CB graft (n = 7). CD46 expression was assessed by FACS analysis on total lymphocytes, monocytes, NK cells, T and B cells subsets, plasmacytoid (pDCs) dendritic cells and stem cells.ResultsAs all cell subsets were found CD46 positive, CD46 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was then considered for comparison between the three blood sources and the three graft sources. The most impressive result observed was that HHV-6 cell receptor CD46 expression was significantly reduced in almost all cell components of thawed CB graft compared to other graft sources.ConclusionsThis original study shows strong differences in term of quantitative CD46 expression between several blood and grafts samples. Our results suggest that other factors than the qualitative CD46 expression play a role in the higher HHV-6 reactivation observed after CB transplant in adults.     

The High Diversity of MRSA Clones Detected in a University Hospital in Istanbul

Background: To characterize the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones present in Istanbul, 102 MRSA isolates collected during a 5-year period at the Istanbul Medical Faculty Hospital were characterized using microarray analysis and phenotypic resistance profiles.Methods: Resistance to methicillin was detected with a cefoxitin disk diffusion assay and confirmed with a MRSA-agar and MRSA detection kit. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by a disk diffusion assay and interpreted according to the 2012 guidelines of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology. Decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides was confirmed using the population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC) method. The presence of the mecA gene was detected by polymerase chain reaction. Bacterial DNA was extracted according to the manufacturer''s recommended protocol using commercial extraction kits. Strains were extensively characterized using the DNA microarray.Results: Isolates were grouped into six clonal complexes. The most frequently detected clone was the Vienna/Hungarian/Brazilian clone (ST239-MRSA-III), which accounted for 53.9% of the isolates. These isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics, particularly penicillin, tetracycline, rifampicin, kanamycin, tobramycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, erythromycin, lincomycin and fosfomycin. Furthermore, three isolates were detected by population analysis profile as heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA). The UK-EMRSA-15 clone (ST22-MRSA-IV PVL negative) was detected in 9.8% of the isolates and was mainly susceptible to all anti-staphylococcal antibiotics. Seven isolates (6.9%) were positive for PVL genes and were assigned to the CC80-MRSA-IV clone (European CA-MRSA clone, three isolates), ST8-MRSA-IV clone (USA300 clone, two isolates, one ACME-positive) or ST22-MRSA-IV clone (“Regensburg EMRSA” clone, two isolates). All other clones were detected in one to six isolates and corresponded to well-known clones (e.g., Pediatric clone, Dublin EMRSA clone, WA MRSA-54/63, WA MRSA-1/57).Conclusions: This work highlighted both the high prevalence of ST239-MRSA-III clone and the large diversity of the other MRSA clones detected in a university hospital in Istanbul.     

Self-rehabilitation combined with botulinum toxin to improve arm function in people with chronic stroke. A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundBotulinum toxin injection (BTI) reduces muscle hyperactivity, but its effect on active upper-limb function is limited. Intensive rehabilitation could optimize the effects; however, outpatient post-stroke rehabilitation is usually not intensive. One solution could be self-rehabilitation.ObjectivesThe aim of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the effect of a self-rehabilitation program combined with BTI on upper-limb function in individuals with chronic hemiparesis.MethodsIn total, 33 outpatients were randomly allocated to receive BTI + self-rehabilitation (R group: n = 17) or BTI alone (C group: n = 16). Outcomes evaluated just before the BTI and 4 weeks later included the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT time: primary outcome), Action Research Arm Test, fatigue and quality of life.ResultsChange in WMFT did not differ between groups at 4 weeks (WMFT time: ?14% for R group, ?4% for C group. WFMT score: +12% for R group, 0% in C group). WFMT time and score improved significantly in the R group only (?14%, P = 0.01, and +12%, P = 0.02). In addition, the proportion of patients with improved WMFT time and score was higher in the R than C group (R group: 71% improved score, 77% improved time; C group: 43% improved score, 50% improved time). Also, passive range of shoulder flexion (P = 0.03) and wrist extension (P = 0.01) improved only in the R group. No other variables changed significantly. Compliance was excellent; average daily training time was greater than that prescribed.ConclusionsThe addition of a self-rehabilitation program to BTI did not significantly improve functional outcomes more than BTI alone; however, movement quality and speed improved only in the self-rehabilitation group. Participants in the self-rehabilitation group trained more than they were asked to, which suggests that they found the program worthwhile. These clinically relevant findings justify larger-scale studies of the effects of self-rehabilitation to enhance the effects of BTI. Clinical trial: NCT02699762.     

Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice

For over four decades, it has been possible to offer prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal abnormalities. Prenatal testing is now available for a wide range of monogenic disorders as well as chromosomal abnormalities and should be provided within the ethical framework of informed consent and autonomous choice. However, there are no published guidelines for health professionals from varied disciplines who offer prenatal diagnosis (PND) in a range of possible settings including departments of maternity, obstetrics and clinical genetics. We used an Expert Group technique to develop a set of guidelines for provision of prenatal diagnostic services. Thirteen European health professionals, all experts in PND, participated in a workshop to develop the guidelines, which were then subjected to a wide consultation process. The objective of PND was defined as providing prenatal diagnostic testing services (for genetic conditions) that enable families to make informed choices consistent with their individual needs and values and which support them in dealing with the outcome of such testing. General principles, logistical considerations, clinical care and counselling topics are all described and are equally applicable to invasive and non-invasive testing. These guidelines provide a framework for ethical clinical care; however, they are flexible enough to enable practitioners to adapt them to their particular setting. Ideally, an individualised approach to each family is required to ensure autonomous choice and informed consent regarding prenatal diagnostic testing within the local ethical and legal framework.     

Evaluation of PCR-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis applied to monogenic diseases: a collaborative ESHRE PGD consortium study

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for monogenic disorders currently involves polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, which must be robust, sensitive and highly accurate, precluding misdiagnosis. Twelve adverse misdiagnoses reported to the ESHRE PGD-Consortium are likely an underestimate. This retrospective study, involving six PGD centres, assessed the validity of PCR-based PGD through reanalysis of untransferred embryos from monogenic-PGD cycles. Data were collected on the genotype concordance at PGD and follow-up from 940 untransferred embryos, including details on the parameters of PGD cycles: category of monogenic disease, embryo morphology, embryo biopsy and genotype assay strategy. To determine the validity of PCR-based PGD, the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Stratified analyses were also conducted to assess the influence of the parameters above on the validity of PCR-based PGD. The analysis of overall data showed that 93.7% of embryos had been correctly classified at the time of PGD, with Se of 99.2% and Sp of 80.9%. The stratified analyses found that diagnostic accuracy is statistically significantly higher when PGD is performed on two cells versus one cell (P=0.001). Se was significantly higher when multiplex protocols versus singleplex protocols were applied (P=0.005), as well as for PGD applied on cells from good compared with poor morphology embryos (P=0.032). Morphology, however, did not affect diagnostic accuracy. Multiplex PCR-based methods on one cell, are as robust as those on two cells regarding false negative rate, which is the most important criteria for clinical PGD applications. Overall, this study demonstrates the validity, robustness and high diagnostic value of PCR-based PGD.     

Separation of on-target efficacy from adverse effects through rational design of a bitopic adenosine receptor agonist

The concepts of allosteric modulation and biased agonism are revolutionizing modern approaches to drug discovery, particularly in the field of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Both phenomena exploit topographically distinct binding sites to promote unique GPCR conformations that can lead to different patterns of cellular responsiveness. The adenosine A₁ GPCR (A₁AR) is a major therapeutic target for cardioprotection, but current agents acting on the receptor are clinically limited for this indication because of on-target bradycardia as a serious adverse effect. In the current study, we have rationally designed a novel A₁AR ligand (VCP746)—a hybrid molecule comprising adenosine linked to a positive allosteric modulator—specifically to engender biased signaling at the A₁AR. We validate that the interaction of VCP746 with the A₁AR is consistent with a bitopic mode of receptor engagement (i.e., concomitant association with orthosteric and allosteric sites) and that the compound displays biased agonism relative to prototypical A₁AR ligands. Importantly, we also show that the unique pharmacology of VCP746 is (patho)physiologically relevant, because the compound protects against ischemic insult in native A₁AR-expressing cardiomyoblasts and cardiomyocytes but does not affect rat atrial heart rate. Thus, this study provides proof of concept that bitopic ligands can be designed as biased agonists to promote on-target efficacy without on-target side effects.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface proteins and tractable drug targets (1, 2). Unfortunately, there remains a high attrition rate associated with traditional GPCR-based drug discovery that, in part, reflects an emphasis on the endogenous agonist binding (orthosteric) site as the predominant means of achieving selective GPCR drug targeting (3). Over the last decade, substantial breakthroughs have occurred in the exploitation of topographically distinct GPCR allosteric sites as a means for attaining greater selectivity, especially in those instances where there is high sequence similarity in the orthosteric site across GPCR subtypes (4–6). However, there are increasing examples where both the therapeutic effect and adverse effects are mediated by the same GPCR target (7). In these situations, the desired selectivity needs to be attained at the level of the intracellular signaling pathways linked to a given receptor subtype.GPCRs are highly dynamic proteins, fluctuating between different conformations; these conformations can be linked to different cellular outcomes (8). Thus, chemically distinct ligands, interacting with either orthosteric or allosteric sites, have the potential to stabilize different interaction networks within a GPCR to promote a subset of signaling pathways linked to the receptor at the expense of others. This phenomenon has been termed biased agonism (7, 9, 10). The overall promise of biased agonism is the ability to design GPCR ligands that selectively engage therapeutically relevant signaling pathways while sparing pathways that contribute to undesirable side effects mediated by the same target.The adenosine receptor (AR) family is an important class of physiologically and therapeutically relevant GPCRs that can benefit substantially from more selective drug targeting. Although all four AR subtypes are expressed in the mammalian heart (11, 12), the well-known protective effects of adenosine in this tissue are predominantly mediated by the adenosine A₁ receptor (A₁AR) subtype, especially under conditions of ischemia and reperfusion injury (13–17). Unfortunately, the transition of A₁AR agonists into the clinic has been severely hindered because of high doses causing on-target bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and hypotension (13, 18). As a consequence, clinical trials of AR agonists have had limited success because of the suboptimal dose of agonist that can be used (19–22). It is possible that this problem may be overcome through the exploitation of biased agonism at the A₁AR.Although no study has identified biased orthosteric A₁AR ligands, we recently showed that the 2-amino-3-benzoylthiophene allosteric modulator (VCP171) could promote biased signaling in the activity of the prototypical orthosteric agonist, R(-)N6-(2-phenylisopropyl) adenosine (R-PIA) (23). Thus, we hypothesized that the rational design of a bitopic ligand (i.e., a class of hybrid molecule containing both orthosteric and allosteric pharmacophores) (24–26) may be able to achieve high efficacy and biased agonism at the A₁AR in a single molecule. Herein, we report proof of concept that it is possible to use this approach as a means to dissociate on-target efficacy from on-target side effects.     

Positive and negative allosteric modulators promote biased signaling at the calcium-sensing receptor

The calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) is a G protein-coupled receptor whose function can be allosterically modulated in a positive or negative manner by calcimimetics or calcilytics, respectively. Indeed, the second-generation calcimimetic, cinacalcet, has proven clinically useful in the treatment of chronic kidney disease patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism but is not widely used in earlier stages of renal disease due to the potential to predispose such patients to hypocalcaemia and hyperphosphatemia. The development of a biased CaSR ligand that is more selective for specific signaling pathway(s) leading only to beneficial effects may overcome this limitation. The detection of such stimulus-bias at a G protein-coupled receptor requires investigation across multiple signaling pathways and the development of methods to quantify the effects of allosteric ligands on orthosteric ligand affinity and cooperativity at each pathway. In the current study, we determined the effects of the calcimimetics, NPS-R568 or cinacalcet, and the calcilytic, NPS-2143, on Ca(o)(2+)-mediated intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and plasma membrane ruffling in a stably transfected human embryonic kidney 293-TREx c-myc-CaSR cell line and applied a novel analytical model to quantify these modulator effects. We present quantitative evidence for the generation of stimulus bias by both positive and negative allosteric modulators of the CaSR, manifested as greater allosteric modulation of intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization relative to ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and a higher affinity of the modulators for the state of the CaSR mediating plasma membrane ruffling relative to the other two pathways. Our findings provide the first evidence that an allosteric modulator used in clinical practice exhibits stimulus bias.