Altered Peptidase Activities in Thyroid Neoplasia and Hyperplasia

Background. Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA), and thyroid nodular hyperplasia (TNH) are the most frequent diseases of the thyroid gland. Previous studies described the involvement of dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (DPPIV/CD26) in the development of thyroid neoplasia and proposed it as an additional tool in the diagnosis/prognosis of these diseases. However, very little is known about the involvement of other peptidases in neoplastic and hyperplastic processes of this gland. Methods. The catalytic activity of 10 peptidases in a series of 30 PTC, 10 FTA, and 14 TNH was measured fluorimetrically in tumour and nontumour adjacent tissues. Results. The activity of DPPIV/CD26 was markedly higher in PTC than in FTA, TNH, and nontumour tissues. Aspartyl aminopeptidase (AspAP), alanyl aminopeptidase (AlaAP), prolyl endopeptidase, pyroglutamyl peptidase I, and aminopeptidase B activities were significantly increased in thyroid neoplasms when compared to nontumour tissues. AspAP and AlaAP activities were also significantly higher in PTC than in FTA and TNH. Conclusions. These data suggest the involvement of DPPIV/CD26 and some cytosolic peptidases in the neoplastic development of PTC and FTA. Further studies will help to define the possible clinical usefulness of AlaAP and AspAP in the diagnosis/prognosis of thyroid neoplasms.     

Ward mortality after ICU discharge: a multicenter validation of the Sabadell score

Background  

Tools for predicting post-ICU patients’ outcomes are scarce. A single-center study showed that the Sabadell score classified patients into four groups with clear-cut differences in ward mortality.     

Do patient-related blood donors represent a threat to the safety of the blood supply?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient-related blood donors contribute to a significant proportion of the blood units collected in hospital-based blood banks. However, there is some concern on the safety of this kind of donation because of the possible existence of incentives for the donor to conceal deferrable risk factors, thus increasing the risk of donation within the window-period of transfusion-transmitted infections. We tested the hypothesis that if patient-related blood donors are less safe than community ones, the former would display both a higher prevalence of viral markers and a predominance of undisclosed risk-factors with low social acceptability. DESIGN AND METHODS: Comparison of virus reactivity rates against hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and the associated risk-factors, between patient-related and community donors who donated whole blood in our center during a five-year period. RESULTS: During the period under study 72,226 donors gave 149,944 whole blood units, of which 22,888 (15.3%) were provided by patient-related donors. There were 273 confirmed virus-reactive donations (15 anti-HIV, 148 anti-HCV and 110 HBsAg). The adjusted prevalence of virus reactivity was 19 (95% CI: 11-35) times higher in first-time donors than in repeat donors, 3.5 (95% CI: 2.3-4.1) times higher in donors > or = 30 years old than in younger ones, and 2.5 (95% CI: 1.9-3.2) times higher in patient-related donors than in community donors. With regard to deferrable risk-factors not disclosed at the time of donation, there was no significant difference between patient-related and community donors in the frequency of people who denied any risk-factor or who admitted intravenous drug use or high-risk sex. Past household contact with individuals having liver disease was significantly more frequent in patient-related donors than in community ones. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the hypothesis that patient-related donors represent an increased risk of window-period donation because they conceal deferrable risk factors more frequently than community donors.     

Targeting virulence not viability in the search for future antibacterials

New antibacterials need new approaches to overcome the problem of rapid antibiotic resistance. Here we review the development of potential new antibacterial drugs that do not kill bacteria or inhibit their growth, but combat disease instead by targeting bacterial virulence.     

Syncope in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: More Than Just an Obstruction Issue

BackgroundSevere aortic stenosis (AoS) is considered a primary cause of syncope. However, other mechanisms may be present in these patients and accurate diagnosis can have important clinical implications. The aim of this study is to assess the different etiologies of syncope in patients with severe AoS and the impact on prognosis of attaining a certain or highly probable diagnosis for the syncope.MethodsOut of a cohort of 331 patients with AoS and syncope, 61 had severe AoS and were included in the study. Main cause of syncope and adverse cardiac events were assessed.ResultsIn 40 patients (65.6%), we reached a certain or highly probable diagnosis of the main cause of the syncope. AoS was considered the primary cause of the syncope in only 7 patients (17.5% of the patients with known etiology). Atrioventricular block (14 patients, 35.0%) and vasovagal syncope (6 patients, 15.0%) were the most frequently diagnosed causes. The presence of a known cause for syncope during the admission was not associated with a lower incidence of recurrence during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-2.40). Syncope of unknown etiology was independently associated with greater mortality during 1-year follow-up (HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.3-21.6) and 3-year follow-up (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.3).ConclusionsIn a high proportion of patients with severe AoS admitted for syncope, the valvulopathy was not the main cause of the syncope. Syncope in two-thirds of this population was caused by either bradyarrhythmia or reflex causes. Syncope of unknown cause was associated with increased short- and medium-term mortality, independently from treatment of the valve disease. An exhaustive work-up should be conducted to determine the main cause for syncope.