β-Phosphoglucomutase (βPGM) catalyzes isomerization of β-
d-glucose 1-phosphate (βG1P) into
d-glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) via sequential phosphoryl transfer steps using a β-
d-glucose 1,6-bisphosphate (βG16BP) intermediate. Synthetic fluoromethylenephosphonate and methylenephosphonate analogs of βG1P deliver novel step 1 transition state analog (TSA) complexes for βPGM, incorporating trifluoromagnesate and tetrafluoroaluminate surrogates of the phosphoryl group. Within an invariant protein conformation, the β-
d-glucopyranose ring in the βG1P TSA complexes (step 1) is flipped over and shifted relative to the G6P TSA complexes (step 2). Its equatorial hydroxyl groups are hydrogen-bonded directly to the enzyme rather than indirectly via water molecules as in step 2. The (C)O–P bond orientation for binding the phosphate in the inert phosphate site differs by ∼30° between steps 1 and 2. By contrast, the orientations for the axial O–Mg–O alignment for the TSA of the phosphoryl group in the catalytic site differ by only ∼5°, and the atoms representing the five phosphorus-bonded oxygens in the two transition states (TSs) are virtually superimposable. The conformation of βG16BP in step 1 does not fit into the same invariant active site for step 2 by simple positional interchange of the phosphates: the TS alignment is achieved by conformational change of the hexose rather than the protein.Efficient enzyme catalysis of the manipulation of phosphates is one of the great achievements of evolution (
1). Enzymes that operate on phosphate monoesters and anhydrides transfer the phosphoryl moiety, PO
3−, with rate accelerations approaching 10
21 for monoesters, placing them among the most proficient of all enzymes (
1). Phosphomutases, including α-phosphoglucomutase (αPGM) (
2,
3) and β-phosphoglucomutase (βPGM) (
4–
6), phosphoglycerate mutase (
7), α-phosphomannomutase (αPMM/PGM) (
8), and
N-acetylglucosamine-phosphate mutase (
9), merit special attention because these enzymes have to be effective in donating a phosphoryl group to either of two hydroxyl groups that have intrinsically different reactivity. Only when both half-reactions of a phosphomutase are accessible to mechanistic analysis can the problem of how an enzyme accommodates two distinct chemistries within a single active site be resolved. Hexose 1-phosphate mutases, including enzymes central to glycolysis and other metabolic pathways, are well characterized (
10,
11). They are generally activated by phosphorylation to form a covalent phosphoenzyme, which then donates its PO
3− group to either of its substrates to deliver a common, transient, hexose 1,6-bisphosphate intermediate species. However, structural studies on phosphomutases are complicated by the rapid and often imbalanced equilibrium position between the substrates, and kinetic studies are problematic because of competitive, parallel pathways of enzyme activation and substrate inhibition (
12,
13). As a result, transition states (TSs) for both half-reactions have not hitherto been accessible for mechanistic analysis.βPGM is the best-characterized hexose 1-phosphate mutase and is a member of the haloacid dehalogenase (HAD) superfamily (
14), which has 58 HAD homologs in
Homo sapiens (
11). The key cellular role for βPGM is to support growth on maltose (
14), which demands isomerization of β-
d-glucose 1-phosphate (βG1P) via β-
d-glucose 1,6-bisphosphate (βG16BP) into
d-glucose 6-phosphate (G6P), a universal source of cellular energy. This interconversion is achieved via a transient, covalent phosphoenzyme intermediate involving an essential aspartic acid, Asp8, to conserve the phosphoryl group that migrates intermolecularly (). Mechanistically, this pathway demands the architecture of the catalytic site to be effective in promoting phosphoryl transfer from phospho-Asp8 to the 6-OH group of βG1P (step 1), followed by reverse phosphoryl transfer from 1β-OH of βG16BP to Asp8 (step 2).
Open in a separate windowReaction scheme and free energy profile for the conversion of βG1P into G6P via βG16BP catalyzed by βPGM. The phosphoryl transfer reaction between βG1P and the phosphoenzyme (βPGM
P) is step 1 (transferring phosphate is shown in blue), and the equivalent reaction between G6P and the phosphoenzyme is step 2 (transferring phosphate is shown in red). The two intermediate complexes are labeled βG16BP and βG61BP to indicate the two orientations of bound β-bisphosphoglucose. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds within the glucose phosphates are indicated in green. The PDB ID codes (shown in brown) for the structures of metal fluoride ground state analog (GSA) and TSA complexes are listed next to the corresponding steps. G6P is
ca. 8 kJ⋅mol
−1 lower in free energy than βG1P at equilibrium (
12). βG1P binds fivefold less tightly than G6P in an AlF
4− TSA complex, corresponding to a binding energy difference of
ca. 4 kJ⋅mol
−1. This places the TSA for step 1 (blue)
ca. 12 kJ⋅mol
−1 (4 kJ⋅mol
−1 + 8 kJ⋅mol
−1) higher in free energy than the TSA for step 2 (red). The free energy levels of TS1 and TS2 are placed only approximately, using the assumption that the free energy difference (wavy arrows) between the TSA complex and the true TS is similar for both step 1 and step 2. The approximate relative free energy levels for the intermediate enzyme-bound states denoted with βG16BP and βG61BP are based on published data (
13).Step 2 has been studied intensively, with analyses focused on structural studies of trifluoromagnesate (MgF
3−) and tetrafluoroaluminate (AlF
4−) transition state analogs (TSAs) and trifluoroberyllate ground state analogs for G6P complexes (
4–
6,
15).
19F NMR resonances for these complexes additionally have provided in situ probes for the electronic and protonic environment of the phosphate moiety in the active site (
4–
6,
15,
16). Such studies have confirmed a trigonal bipyramidal (tbp) TS associated with inline stereochemistry and general acid–base catalysis, following the rearrangement of near-attack conformers (
6). By contrast, step 1, involving phosphorylation of the 6-OH group of βG1P, is not well understood. The corresponding TSA complexes hitherto have proved inaccessible; attempted crystallization of the mutase using βG1P with magnesium and fluoride provides the same MgF
3− TSA complex as is formed directly with G6P because residual enzyme activity catalyzes mutation of βG1P into G6P at a rate competitive with crystallization of the complex (
17). Similarly, although
19F NMR studies have identified a transient TSA complex for an AlF
4− complex of βG1P, it readily isomerizes into the corresponding TSA complex of G6P (
SI Appendix, Fig. S1). This impasse is resolved here by the synthesis and use of stable analogs of βG1P that resist mutase-catalyzed isomerization. Because it has been established that α-fluorination of 6-phosphonomethyl-6-deoxy-glucose (G6CP) can enhance or impair analog binding to glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, depending on the stereochemistry of the α-fluorine substituent (
18), we have synthesized both diastereoisomeric α-monofluoromethylenephosphonate analogs of βG1P, its methylenephosphonate analog, and the three corresponding phosphonate 1α-hydroxyl analogs. We have identified the two best-binding analogs by
19F NMR and measured their affinities with βPGM in TSA complexes using fluorescence titration. We have thereby obtained three high-resolution crystal structures of TSA complexes for step 1 of the mutase catalytic reaction. Their comparison with TSA complexes for step 2 establishes the substantially different binding modes for βG1P and G6P in their respective reactions.
相似文献