Incremental versus maximum bite advancement during twin-block therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of incremental and maximum bite advancement during treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance in the permanent dentition. It was performed at 3 district general hospitals in the United Kingdom with 4 operators. Two hundred three patients, 10-14 years old, were randomized. Control patients had the initial bite taken edge-to-edge for appliance construction with a standard Twin-block. Experimental patients had 2 mm initial bite advancement and subsequent 2 mm advancements at 6 weekly intervals with a Twin-block appliance incorporating advancement screws. Data were collected at the start and the finish of Twin-block treatment. The use of incremental advancement of the Twin-block did not confer any advantages in terms of process and outcome of the treatment. However, patient compliance was influenced by operator and patient age. The duration of treatment was influenced by operator and initial overjet. Incremental bite advancement produced no advantages over maximum advancement.     

Can Electrocardiographic Criteria Predict Adverse Cardiac Events and Positive Cardiac Markers?

OBJECTIVES: To determine electrocardiogram (ECG) predictors of positive cardiac markers and short-term adverse cardiac events in an undifferentiated chest pain population presenting to emergency departments (EDs). The authors hypothesized that specific ECG findings, other than those previously identified in higher-risk populations, would be predictive of cardiac outcomes and positive cardiac markers. METHODS: This study used data from a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed Internet-based data registry of undifferentiated chest pain patients (i*trACS). Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine the ECG findings that were predictive of 1) positive cardiac markers and 2) short-term adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: ST-segment elevation (STE), ST-segment depression (STD), pathological Q-waves (PQW), and T-wave inversion were associated with increased odds of percutaneous coronary intervention or catheterization, myocardial infarction, or coronary artery bypass grafting. The odds of creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) measuring positive were increased if STE, STD, or PQW were present [odds ratio (OR) 2.495, 2.582, and 1.295, respectively]. A right bundle branch block tended to decrease the odds of CK-MB measuring positive (OR 0.658). A similar pattern of results was observed for troponin I (OR 3.608 for STE, 3.72 for STD, 1.538 for PQW). Troponin T showed an increased odds of measuring positive if any of STE, STD, left bundle branch block, or T-wave inversion were evident (OR 2.313, 2.816, 1.80, and 1.449, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Initial ECG criteria can be used to predict short-term cardiac outcomes and positive cardiac markers. These findings can be important aids in the risk-stratification and aggressive treatment regimens of chest pain patients presenting to EDs.     

奥利司他对肥胖青少年体重和机体组分的影响——随机对照试验

背景：儿童和青少年超重和肥胖正迅速增加。在该人群，单纯行为疗法减肥及维持体重下降的效果有限，但是对药物治疗尚未进行广泛的研究。 目的：确定奥利州他（Orlistat）在青少年体重治疗方面的效果及其安个性。 设计、地点和病例：于美国和加拿大32个中心、539例肥胖青少年（12—16岁；体重指数[body mass index，BMI]在第95百分化之上≥2单位）进行的多ln0、54剧（2000年8月至2002年10月）随机双盲研究。 干预：给予奥利司他（n=357）或安慰剂（n=182）120mg，每口3次，持续1年；加适度低热卡饮食（脂肪占30％）、运动和行为治疗。 主要观察指标：BMI变化；二级指标包括腰围和髋用、体重下降、脂质测量以及机体对口服葡萄糖的血糖和胰岛素反心。 结果：至12周时，两组BMI均有下降；此后，奥利司他组体重维持稳定而安慰剂组则超过基线。研究结束时，奥利司他组BMI下降0．55。而安慰剂组则增加0．31（P=0．001）。与安慰剂组的15．7％相比，奥利司他组26．5％的病例BMI下降≥5％（P=0．005）；BMI下降≥10％者分别为4．5％和13．3％（P=0．002）。在研究结束时，奥利司他组体重增加0．53kg，安慰剂组增加3．14kg（P〈0．001）。双能X线吸收测量娃示，这种差异可用脂肪体再的变化解释。奥利司他组腰围下降，安慰剂组腰围上升（-1．33cm比＋0．12cm；P〈0．05）。奥利司他组发生轻至中度胃肠道不良事件者为9％-50％，安慰剂组为1％～13％。 结论：与安慰剂比较，奥利司他与饮食、运动和行为改善联合可显著改善肥胖青少年体重的治疗。在这个青少年人群，连续使用奥利司他1年并无重要安全问题，尽管奥利司他组胃肠道不良事件较为常见。     

Outpatient Initiation of Insulin: A Nurse Practitioner Protocol

Noninsulin dependent diabetes (type II diabetes) is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. Clients can generally be controlled by diet and exercise or a combination of diet, exercise, and oral hypoglycemic agents. When this therapy is not effective in controlling the hyperglycemia, the health care provider must choose to initiate insulin therapy. Outpatient initiation of insulin is an alternative to hospitalization in the type II diabetic client. Clinical guidelines for the initiation of insulin on an outpatient basis and management of the diabetic client are presented.