Using Protamine Can Significantly Reduce the Incidence of Bleeding Complications after Carotid Endarterectomy without Increasing the Risk of Ischemic Cerebral Events

Background

Controversy persists regarding the use of protamine sulfate (PS) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), chiefly because of conflicting experiences reporting both less bleeding and a higher stroke risk. The goal of the present study was to test the hypothesis that reversing heparin with PS after CEA significantly reduces the incidence of bleeding complications without increasing the risk of postoperative stroke.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2012 all consecutive patients undergoing CEA under general anesthesia at our institution received 5,000 U of heparin prior to carotid clamping, which was partially (half-dose) reversed with PS 25 mg immediately after declamping (group I). Heparinization had never been reversed with PS in earlier CEAs performed from 1998 to 2009 at the same institution (group II). All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by a neurologist, and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all group I patients to exclude any silent cerebral infarction. End points of the study were bleeding complications, perioperative (30-day) stroke, and death.

Results

Overall, 219 CEAs (201 patients) were performed in group I, and 1,458 CEAs (1,294 patients) in group II. Demographics, risk factors, and preoperative antiplatelet medication were comparable in the two groups. The incidence of adverse events (group I vs group II) was as follows: stroke (0 vs 0.5 % [8/1,458], p = 0.27); death (0 vs 0 %); neck bleeding (0 vs 8.2 % [120/1,458], p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results of the present study demonstrate that (1) partially neutralizing heparin with PS after CEA can significantly reduce the risk of bleeding complications, and (2) there is no association between the administration of PS and the incidence of postoperative stroke.     

Bone marrow derived stem cells in joint and bone diseases: a concise review

Stem cells have huge applications in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Their use is currently not restricted to the life-threatening diseases but also extended to disorders involving the structural tissues, which may not jeopardize the patients’ life, but certainly influence their quality of life. In fact, a particularly popular line of research is represented by the regeneration of bone and cartilage tissues to treat various orthopaedic disorders. Most of these pioneering research lines that aim to create new treatments for diseases that currently have limited therapies are still in the bench of the researchers. However, in recent years, several clinical trials have been started with satisfactory and encouraging results. This article aims to review the concept of stem cells and their characterization in terms of site of residence, differentiation potential and therapeutic prospective. In fact, while only the bone marrow was initially considered as a “reservoir” of this cell population, later, adipose tissue and muscle tissue have provided a considerable amount of cells available for multiple differentiation. In reality, recently, the so-called “stem cell niche” was identified as the perivascular space, recognizing these cells as almost ubiquitous. In the field of bone and joint diseases, their potential to differentiate into multiple cell lines makes their application ideally immediate through three main modalities: (1) cells selected by withdrawal from bone marrow, subsequent culture in the laboratory, and ultimately transplant at the site of injury; (2) bone marrow aspirate, concentrated and directly implanted into the injury site; (3) systemic mobilization of stem cells and other bone marrow precursors by the use of growth factors. The use of this cell population in joint and bone disease will be addressed and discussed, analysing both the clinical outcomes but also the basic research background, which has justified their use for the treatment of bone, cartilage and meniscus tissues.     

Prosthetic Improvement of Pronounced Buccally Positioned Zygomatic Implants: A Clinical Report

This report presents a prosthetic technique for the improvement of surgically positioned, buccally placed zygomatic implants with the use of custom abutments for improved retention screw position and an esthetic implant reconstruction. The patient presented four zygomatic implants with pronounced buccal inclination. The anterior implants were inclined toward the location where the anterior artificial teeth should be placed during rehabilitation. As the manufacturer does not provide angulated abutments, we attempted the waxing and overcasting of a prosthetic abutment, repositioning the access holes of the prosthetic screws to a more palatal position. This clinical report demonstrates that abutment customization could be an interesting way to relocate the access holes of the prosthetic screws in cases of zygomatic implants with pronounced buccal inclination.