Multiple meningiomas: does quantity matter? a population-based survival analysis with underlined age and sex differences

Journal of Neuro-Oncology - Intracranial meningiomas rarely present with multiple lesions. To the best of our knowledge, current literature regarding meningiomatosis (MM) is mostly comprised of...     

Early presentation of urinary retention in multiple system atrophy: can the disease begin in the sacral spinal cord?

Journal of Neurology - Lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction presents early in multiple system atrophy (MSA), usually initially as urinary urgency, frequency and incontinence, and voiding...     

Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–sponsored Summit

Uptake of colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal. Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) offers promise for increasing screening rates, but optimal strategies for implementation have not been well synthesized. In June 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a meeting of subject matter experts and stakeholders to answer key questions regarding mailed FIT implementation in the United States. Points of agreement included: 1) primers, such as texts, telephone calls, and printed mailings before mailed FIT, appear to contribute to effectiveness; 2) invitation letters should be brief and easy to read, and the signatory should be tailored based on setting; 3) instructions for FIT completion should be simple and address challenges that may lead to failed laboratory processing, such as notation of collection date; 4) reminders delivered to initial noncompleters should be used to increase the FIT return rate; 5) data infrastructure should identify eligible patients and track each step in the outreach process, from primer delivery through abnormal FIT follow-up; 6) protocols and procedures such as navigation should be in place to promote colonoscopy after abnormal FIT; 7) a high-quality, 1-sample FIT should be used; 8) sustainability requires a program champion and organizational support for the work, including sufficient funding and external policies (such as quality reporting requirements) to drive commitment to program investment; and 9) the cost effectiveness of mailed FIT has been established. Participants concluded that mailed FIT is an effective and efficient strategy with great potential for increasing colorectal cancer screening in diverse health care settings if more widely implemented.     

Factors Associated with Macular Staphyloma Area on Ultra-widefield Fundus Images

PurposeTo assess the feasibility of applying ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images for macular staphyloma area (MSA) measurement and investigate the associated factors with MSA.MethodsThis is a retrospective study. MSA was measured by UWF imaging. Central foveal thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness, subfoveal scleral thickness were measured on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Intraclass correlation coefficients of MSA measurement would be evaluated. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the associated factors with MSA.ResultsIn total, 135 eyes of 92 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 64.73 ± 10.84 years. Mean MSA on UWF image was 279.67 ± 71.70 mm². Intraclass correlation coefficients of MSA measurement was 0.965 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.946 to 0.977; p < 0.001). In the multiple linear regression analysis, after adjusting for subfoveal choroidal thickness, best-corrected visual acuity, central foveal thickness, and subfoveal scleral thickness, the factors independently related to MSA were axial length (β = 8.352; 95% CI, 3.306 to 13.398; p = 0.001), sex (β = −26.673; 95% CI, −51.759 to −1.586; p = 0.037), age (β = 1.184; 95% CI, 0.020 to 2.348; p = 0.046).ConclusionsIt is feasible to measure MSA on UWF image. Female, longer axial length, and older age may indicate larger MSA.     

Reimagining Undergraduate Medical Education in a Post-COVID-19 Landscape

Online education due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused many medical schools to increasingly employ asynchronous and virtual learning that favored student independence and flexibility. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted existing shortcomings of the healthcare field in providing for marginalized and underserved communities. This perspective piece details the authors’ opinions as medical students and medical educators on how to leverage the aspects of pandemic medical education to train physicians who can better address these needs.KEY WORDS: undergraduate medical education, social determinants of health, virtual learning

“American medical education needed a revolution,” writes Professor Jon M. Barry in The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History¹. He described a different era of medical education, a time in the late 1800s when medical students graduated without having ever touched a patient. The revolution began at Johns Hopkins Hospital with William Osler’s teaching hospital model for postgraduate training, a model that spread across the nation and has formed the foundation for modern medical education². A few decades later, the Flexner Report commissioned by the American Medical Association codified recommendations for standardized curriculum based on Osler’s program at Hopkins, giving rise to the biomedical model of medical education^{3, 4}. In the same decade, the 1918 influenza pandemic, one of the deadliest pandemics in the history of humankind, infected approximately one-third of the world’s population, causing an estimated 50 million deaths⁵. Clearly, as Barry describes, it was a time of great crisis, ripe for great change.The Flexner Report and 1918 pandemic thus led to many medical schools adopting the biomedical model and overhauling their curricula. Since then, shortcomings of the Flexner Report, such as limiting the opportunities of Black physicians and excluding social determinants of health from the medical model^{4, 6}, have been acknowledged and medical education has increasingly prioritized diversity and inclusion and public health education to better serve the diverse health needs of society^7–9. The biopsychosocial model of medicine has largely supplanted the biomedical model^{7, 8}, and many medical schools have modified their biomedical curricula to incorporate systems-based learning and social determinants of health.Yet healthcare is far from perfect today, with issues of cost, access, and systemic inequality still plaguing patients. As medical students and medical educators, we strive for a medical education that will better prepare the next generation of physicians to address these failures of the profession. We also have experienced how the current COVID-19 pandemic, similar to the 1918 influenza pandemic, has caused great crises in healthcare and changes in medical education^10–12. As vaccines have made a post-COVID era more tangible, we believe the medical field is once again ripe for revolution. In this perspective piece, we detail how we can leverage the current flux in medical education, capitalizing on asynchronous and virtual learning with a focus on social determinants and disparities, to better train physicians who will be prepared to serve the public health in a post-COVID era.