Novel ROC-type method for testing the efficiency of multivariate statistical methods in fMRI.

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method is a useful and popular tool for testing the efficiency of various diagnostic tests applicable to functional MRI (fMRI) data. Typically, the diagnostic tests are applied on simulated and pseudo-human fMRI data, and the area under the ROC curve is used as a measure of the efficiency of the diagnostic test. The effectiveness of such a method depends on how well the simulated data approximate the real data. For multivariate statistical methods, however, this technique is usually inadequate, as the spatial dependence among voxels is ignored for simulated data. In this work a modified ROC method using real fMRI data with a broader scope is proposed. This method can be applied to most fMRI postprocessing techniques, including multivariate analyses such as canonical correlation analysis (CCA). Also, the relationship of the modified ROC method with the conventional ROC method is discussed in detail.     

Outcome of live related and live unrelated renal transplants

Summary: This study compares the outcomes of 229 renal transplants, of which 156 were live related renal transplants done at our centre and 73 unrelated transplants done at other centres but followed up at our centre. All the patients were on triple immunosuppression for periods varying between 9 months and 1 year. Patient characteristics, rejections, infections and 1 and 5 years patient and graft survival were analyzed in the two groups. the outcome of patients who continued on cyclosporine beyond 1 year was compared to those who discontinued cyclosporine at 1 year. Males predominated (191 vs 38) in both groups, while younger patients (<50 years) predominated in live related group (152 vs four). There was no difference in the incidence of infection, rejection, graft dysfunction, graft loss or death between the two groups. the 1 and 5 year patient survival in the related and unrelated group, (93.7% and 71.4% vs and 85% and 66%) and graft survival (90.4% and 69.4% vs 83.3% and 65.4%) were similar. However, in the unrelated group, patients who discontinued cyclosporine had a higher incidence of rejections (38% vs 14%) and graft loss (43% vs 11.8%), while in the related group no such difference was found. It is concluded that 1 and 5 year patient and graft survival is comparable between live related and live unrelated transplantation. However, in the unrelated group it is necessary to continue cyclosporine beyond 1 year in order to achieve comparable results.     

Corpectomy for multi-level cervical spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

The choice of a surgical approach for multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is still a controversial issue. While most of the surgeons are still performing decompression by laminectomy some are doing multi-level anterior decompression. Few neurosurgeons are performing decompression by corpectomy. We have treated 26 patients by median cervical corpectomy during the last 4 years. These patients were followed up for a mean period of 25 months. Twenty one (80%) patients had a good outcome, 2 patients remained unchanged and 3 expired. Review of the literature and our experience indicates that patients with CSM and OPLL should be operated by median cervical corpectomy (anterior approach).     

Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Administration of analgesic medication, before the actual onset of painful stimulus, is more effective than that after the onset of painful stimulus. This is the principle of preemptive analgesia. Although it is often considered superior to other forms of analgesia, its role in postoperative pain relief after lumbosacral spinal surgery has not been fully investigated. PURPOSE: To analyze the efficacy of preemptive analgesia with a single caudal epidural injection for patients undergoing surgeries on the lumbosacral spine by the posterior approach. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Randomized, double-blinded and controlled clinical trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eighty-two patients who underwent discectomy in the lumbosacral spine by the posterior approach, with or without instrumentation, were randomized to the control group (n=40) and to the study group (n=42). METHODS: Patients in control group received a single caudal epidural injection of 20 ml of normal saline. Patients in study group received a single caudal epidural injection of 20 ml containing bupivacaine and tramadol as the active agents. The time interval between this injection and the surgical incision was never less than 20 minutes in either of the groups. This facilitated enough time for the drug to get fixed to the nerve roots, leading to effective preemptive analgesia. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were monitored for postoperative pain immediately after surgery when they had completely recovered and regained consciousness from general anesthesia, and subsequently 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours thereafter. Pain was quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the verbal rating scale (VRS). The time at which supplemental analgesic medication was first demanded in the postoperative period by the patient was also noted. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for age, sex, body weight and the type of surgery they underwent. Because the data did not have a normal Gaussian distribution, the one-tailed Mann-Whitney test, being a nonparametric test, was adopted for statistical analysis. Accordingly, VAS and VRS values at all time intervals were significantly lower (p<.0001) in the study group as compared with the control group. This indicated significantly better pain relief in the study group. There was also a significant delay (p=.0041) in the first demand for supplemental analgesic medication in the postoperative period in the study group. No complication specific to the procedure was noted except for the development of postoperative urinary retention, which was transient and appropriately managed with urinary catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive analgesia with a single caudal epidural injection of bupivacaine and tramadol is a safe, simple and effective method for postoperative pain relief.     

Preoperative methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening: An effective method to control MRSA infections on elective orthopaedics wards

Background: Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections continue to increase in UK hospitals despite the introduction of various control measures. These infections have serious clinical and economic implications, particularly in relation to elective orthopaedic surgery. Methods: A prospective study was performed from August 2003 to July 2004 to assess the effect of preadmission screening and ‘ring fencing’ of beds on the incidence of infection in an elective orthopaedics unit. Results: The preoperative incidence of MRSA colonization was 2.25% and 53% of these patients had at least one risk factor. There were no postoperative MRSA infections in the ring‐fenced orthopaedic unit. Conclusions: Preoperative screening and ring fencing reduced the MRSA incidence to zero in the operated patients. Mechanisms need to be developed where screening and isolation of MRSA cases can be performed in most, if not all, hospital admissions.     

Rapid particle agglutination test for human immunodeficiency virus: hospital-based evaluation

The performance of a rapid particle agglutination test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Capillus HIV type 1 [HIV-1]/HIV-2) on hospital samples is compared with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The test had a sensitivity and specificity of 99 and 98.9%, respectively. In addition, the test was reactive on plasma samples from all individuals infected with HIV-1 subtype C. This test can safely be used for voluntary counseling and testing in India.