The sensitivity and specificity of the immediate-spin crossmatch

The immediate-spin (IS) crossmatch is used to detect ABO incompatibility between donor red cells (RBCs) and the serum of the intended recipient. However, this test may be positive in the absence of ABO incompatibility (false positive) or it may be negative when ABO incompatibility exists (false negative). During a 25-month study, the rates of both false-positive and false-negative IS crossmatch results were evaluated, and the sensitivity and specificity of the IS crossmatch were determined. During the study period, 53,656 IS crossmatches were performed for patients without significant RBC antibodies. Fifty-five patients had positive IS crossmatches, and no false-negative reactions were found. In tests of 55 patients with positive IS crossmatches, 77 false-positive and 5 true-positive reactions were noted. The causes of the false-positive reactions were rouleaux (36 patients), cold-reactive antibodies (8 patients), a combination of rouleaux and cold-reactive antibodies (2 patients), fibrin clot (1 patient), and undetermined (3 patients). The sensitivity and specificity of the IS crossmatch were 100 and 99.86 percent, respectively. Laboratory personnel should be aware that the IS crossmatch may have false-positive or false-negative results, and they should develop written protocols to distinguish quickly between true-positive and false-positive reactions.     

When should antibody screening tests be done for recently transfused patients?

The American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) requires that blood samples used for pretransfusion testing of recently transfused (or pregnant) patients must be obtained within 3 days of scheduled transfusions. This requirement, which became effective in July 1988, amended Standard G2.000 of the AABB, which previously required that pretransfusion testing must be done on blood samples obtained within 2 days of scheduled transfusions. The present study was designed to estimate the risk associated with adopting the amended version of Standard G2.000. Sixty patients who developed significant unexpected alloantibodies after transfusion were studied retrospectively. Thirteen of the 60 patients were found to have newly detectable antibodies within 83 hours of a sample reported to be negative for the new antibody. Had the amended version of Standard G2.000 been in effect, the detection of some of these antibodies might have been delayed up to 24 hours. It was estimated that the implementation of the new AABB requirement at the authors' institution could potentially place about 1 in 3000 transfused patients at risk for an acute or delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction.     

乌司他丁在预防不同胃肠术后吻合口瘘中的效果观察

目的探讨乌司他丁在预防不同胃肠术后吻合口瘘中的效果。方法选取2005年6月～2011年8月于本院进行胃肠术进行治疗的220例患者为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组和观察组各110例,观察组在对照组的基础上加用乌司他丁,后将两组患者中不同术式的吻合口瘘发生率及术前、术后1 d及3 d的血清超敏C反应蛋白（hs-CRP）、白介素2（IL-2）、白介素6（IL-6）、肿瘤坏死因子α（TNF-α）、血液流变学指标进行统计及比较。结果观察组不同术式的吻合口瘘发生率及总发生率均低于对照组,血清hs-CRP、IL-6、TNF-α水平低于对照组,IL-2高于对照组,血液流变学指标改变幅度小于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（均P〈0.05）。结论乌司他丁可以改善胃肠手术患者的炎性状态及血液循环情况,对于降低吻合口瘘的发生率有着积极的作用。     

通过基因芯片筛选创伤修复差异表达基因

目的通过基因芯片筛选同真皮间充质干细胞相关的创伤修复差异表达基因。方法利用贴壁生长的特性分离大鼠真皮间充质干细胞，用Hpure提取伤口液刺激前后dMSCs和创伤前后大鼠皮肤组织中总RNA。PCR扩增已构建抑制消减杂交差异表达文库中485个克隆的插入片断，送北京博奥制作基因芯片。提取的RNA反转录后分别同芯片杂交，找出在细胞水平和组织水平同时高表达的克隆。将这些克隆测序，进行生物信息学分析。结果分离的大鼠真皮间充质干细胞呈纺锤形，在体外显示多向分化潜能。抽提伤口液刺激前后dMSCs和创伤前后大鼠皮肤组织中总RNA，反转录后和基因芯片杂交，发现可能同创伤愈合相关的13条基因，其中热休克蛋白70（HSP70），基质金属蛋白酶3（MMP3），白细胞蛋白酶抑制因子（SLPI）等可能在创伤愈合中有重要意义。结论抑制消减杂交和基因芯片结合是筛选差异表达基因的一种有效方法。伤口液刺激前后dMSCs中差异表达基因的发现能为从基因水平探讨dMSCs参与创伤愈合的分子机制提供新的研究靶点。     

The routine use of Rh-negative reagent red cells for the identification of anti-D and the detection of non-D red cell antibodies

BACKGROUND: Before 1987, fewer than 50 patients per year at the authors' laboratory had a positive antibody detection test due to antepartum Rhesus immunoprophylaxis. However, after 1987, a marked increase was observed in the number of patients who had received Rh immune globulin (RhIG) during pregnancy as part of routine antepartum Rh immunoprophylaxis. In anticipation that an increased use of RhIG during pregnancy would increase the number of patients in whom anti-D was detected by this laboratory, a protocol was developed to abbreviate the process required to identify anti-D. Although this protocol was adopted primarily to address an anticipated increase in antenatal RhIG usage in women, it was also applied to alloimmunized Rh-negative males. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: When an Rh-negative patient (male or female) had a reactive screening test for unexpected antibodies and met certain other criteria, the patient's serum was tested with a three-vial set of Rh-negative reagent red cells (Rh-negative screening RBCs), instead of with panels of typed RBCs (panel RBCs), for the identification of anti- D or the detection of non-D antibodies. If the serum under test did not agglutinate or hemolyze Rh-negative screening RBCs, anti-D was identified and no further testing was performed. If the serum agglutinated or hemolyzed Rh-negative screening RBCs, conventional testing with panel RBCs was done to determine the antibody specificity. RESULTS: Rh-negative patients (n = 1174) who had reactive screening tests for unexpected antibodies were tested with Rh-negative screening RBCs; 1079 were found to have anti-D as a single antibody. Seven of these patients subsequently developed a non-D alloantibody, after transfusion or pregnancy, and one patient had anti-C that escaped detection at the time of initial testing with Rh-negative RBCs (a false- negative result). Ninety-two patients had anti-D in combination with a non-D antibody, and three patients had a non-D antibody but not anti-D. Use of the anti-D identification protocol actually reduced the laboratory workload by 176 College of American Pathologists workload units per month, in spite of a marked increase in the number of patients in whom anti-D was detected. No hemolytic transfusion reaction was attributed to the abbreviation of anti-D identification. CONCLUSION: The identification of anti-D may be abbreviated without jeopardizing patient safety. Such a protocol can reduce laboratory workload and might be particularly appealing to health care facilities that perform antibody detection testing on large numbers of Rh-negative pregnant women, especially if antepartum RhIG is administered routinely.     

Survey on pretransfusion testing

BACKGROUND: Hospitals and blood centers throughout the United States use a variety of reagents and methods to perform pretransfusion testing. A survey was developed to determine the reagents and methods in use and their relative prevalence in different work settings. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A national survey on pretransfusion testing was conducted. Surveys were distributed to state and regional blood bank associations, which then distributed them to hospitals and blood centers within their region. In most instances, the blood centers distributed the survey to the local hospitals. Completed surveys were returned to the authors for review, and all information was entered into a database for analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of the data shows that the majority of blood banks use monoclonal reagents for ABO testing and monoclonal-polyclonal blended reagents for Rh testing. The data show that anti-IgG and polyclonal antihuman globulin reagents are used almost equally for antibody screening (detection) tests and that most blood banks use a three-cell antibody-screening test. Slightly more than 50 percent of hospitals use an immediate-spin crossmatch in the absence of unexpected antibodies. CONCLUSION: A number of approved reagents and methods are used by blood bank laboratories for pretransfusion testing. Facility size (number of beds) and type tend to influence the choice of methods and reagents employed. This survey provides an opportunity for blood bank laboratories to compare their current practices with those of their peers.     

Inhibition of thromboxane formation in vivo and ex vivo: implications for therapy with platelet inhibitory drugs

The capacity of platelets to generate thromboxane A2, reflected by measurement of serum thromboxane B2 (TxB2), greatly exceeds the systemic production of thromboxane in vivo. Thus, it is possible that substantial but incomplete inhibition of thromboxane formation ex vivo would still allow marked augmentation of thromboxane production in vivo. To address this hypothesis, we administered aspirin 120 mg, a selective inhibitor of thromboxane synthase (TxSl), 3-(1H-imidazol-1-yl- methyl)-2-methyl-1H-indole-1-propanoic acid (UK-38, 485) 200 mg, and a combination of both drugs to 12 healthy volunteers and measured the effects on serum TxB2 and urinary 2,3-dinor-thromboxane B2 (Tx-M), an index of endogenous thromboxane biosynthesis. Although serum TxB2 was maximally inhibited by 94 +/- 1% after aspirin and 96 +/- 2% after the TxSl, maximal depression of Tx-M was only 28 +/- 8% and 37 +/- 9%, respectively. Combination of aspirin with the TxSl resulted in a small but significant increase in inhibition of thromboxane generation ex vivo (98 +/- 1% v 94 +/- 1%; P less than 0.05), but a disproportionately greater fall in thromboxane synthesis in vivo (58 +/- 7%; P less than 0.01). Consistent with further inhibition of platelet thromboxane synthesis, addition of the TxSl abolished the transient decline in prostacyclin formation after aspirin alone. Administration of a lower dose of aspirin (20 mg) to 6 healthy subjects caused a small reduction in Tx-M (12 +/- 4%; P less than 0.05) and inhibited serum TxB2 by 48 +/- 2%. The relationship between inhibition of platelet capacity to form thromboxane ex vivo (serum TxB2) and synthesis in vivo (Tx-M) departed markedly from the line of identity. When total blockade of the capacity of platelets to generate thromboxane is approached, minor decrements in capacity result in a disproportionate depression of actual thromboxane biosynthesis. These results imply that pharmacologic inhibition of serum TxB2 must be virtually complete before thromboxane- dependent platelet activation is influenced in vivo.