Debilitating diarrhoea and weight loss due to colitis in two RA patients treated with leflunomide

Diarrhoea and weight loss are frequently reported adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving the disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) leflunomide. According to the available literature these side effects occur mostly during the first 6 months of treatment, are rather mild and rarely lead to treatment withdrawal. In this report, we describe the clinical, endoscopic and histologic findings in two RA patients with severe diarrhoea and important weight loss more than 12 months after starting treatment with leflunomide. In both cases the symptoms were caused by colitis, but one had ulcerative and the other microscopic colitis. Despite treatment with budesonide the complaints only improved after withdrawal of leflunomide, making a causal relationship between this drug and the pathogenesis of colitis probable. The heterogeneous histopathological findings in these two patients, however, do not allow us to draw any definitive conclusions about the mechanism by which leflunomide causes diarrhoea and weight loss in RA patients. We conclude that persistent diarrhoea or weight loss in patients taking leflunomide can be more serious than what is previously reported in the literature. In such cases leflunomide treatment should be stopped and an endoscopic examination of the colon is recommended. Given the long half-life of this drug a washout procedure with cholestyramine should be considered whenever the problem is severe or persistent.     

Proposed guidelines for the management of nodding syndrome

Nodding Syndrome is a poorly understood neurologic disorder of unknown aetiology that affects children and adolescents in Africa. Recent studies have suggested that the head nods are due to atonic seizures and Nodding Syndrome may be classified as probably symptomatic generalised epilepsy. As part of the Ugandan Ministry of Health clinical management response, a multidisciplinary team developed a manual to guide the training of health workers with knowledge and skills to manage the patients. In the absence of a known cause, it was decided to offer symptomatic care. The objective is to relieve symptoms, offer primary and secondary prevention for disability and rehabilitation to improve function. Initial management focuses on the most urgent needs of the patient and the immediate family until ‘stability’ is achieved. The most important needs were considered as seizure control, management of behavioural and psychiatric difficulties, nursing care, nutritional and subsequently, physical and cognitive rehabilitation. This paper summarises the processes by which the proposed guidelines were developed and provides an outline of the specific treatments currently being provided for the patients.     

Comparison of periodontal open flap debridement versus closed debridement with Er,Cr:YSGG laser

Background

Traditional periodontal open flap debridement (OFD) results in reduced pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival recession (GR) and postoperative pain and discomfort. The quest to overcome these shortcomings has led to research into Er,Cr:YSGG laser assisted pocket therapy (ELAPT). This study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of ELAPT versus OFD.

Methods

Fifteen patients with a PD of ≥5 mm and ≤8 mm at two sites were selected. Test sites (Group 1) were treated by ELAPT and the control (Group 2) by OFD. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months and included Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), modified Sulcular Bleeding Index (mSBI), PD, CAL and GR.

Results

Both treatments produced a reduction in PI, GI, mSBI and PD, an increase in GR, and a gain in CAL at 3 and 6 months. The mean gain of CAL in Group 1 at 3 and 6 months (1.60 ± 0.78 and 1.80 ± 0.63) was similar (p > 0.05) to the value of Group 2 (1.93 ± 0.88 and 2.00 ± 0.54). GR increased significantly (p < 0.05) only in Group 2 at 3 and 6 months (1.80 ± 0.56 and 1.87 ± 0.64) compared to Group 1 (0.50 ± 0.68 and 0.60 ± 0.74).

Conclusions

ELAPT compared with OFD results in similar CAL gains with less GR and significant reductions in PD, GI and mSBI, and may be considered as an alternative to surgical therapy.     

Primary motor cortex long‐term plasticity in multiple system atrophy

In humans, intermittent and continuous theta‐burst stimulation (iTBS and cTBS) elicit long‐term changes in motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs) reflecting long‐term potentiation (LTP)‐ and depression (LTD)‐like plasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1). In this study, we used TBS to investigate M1 plasticity in patients with MSA. We also assessed whether responses to TBS reflect M1 excitability as tested by short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short‐interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), and the input/output curves. We studied 20 patients with MSA and 20 healthy subjects (HS). Patients were clinically evaluated with the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale. The left M1 was conditioned with TBS. Twenty MEPs were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle before TBS and 5, 15, and 30 minutes thereafter. In a subgroup of 10 patients, we also tested MEPs elicited by SICI, ICF, SICF, and input/output curves, before TBS. Between‐group analysis of variance showed that at all time points after iTBS MEPs increased, whereas after cTBS they decreased only in HS. In both subgroups tested, patients with predominant parkinsonian and cerebellar features, iTBS and cTBS left MEPs unchanged. MSA patients had reduced SICI, but normal ICF, SICF, and input/output curves. No correlation was found between patients' clinical features and responses to TBS and M1 excitability variables. These findings suggest impaired M1 plasticity in MSA. © 2013 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Coincidental diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis: a case report

The aim of this case report was to present a case of multiple calcified tuberculous lymph nodes found on a panoramic radiograph coincidently diagnosed in an endodontic clinic. A detailed discussion on the differential diagnosis of similar such calcification found in the same region is also presented. A 14‐year‐old girl was referred to our department with the complaint of painless swelling in the left side of the lower jaw. Clinical and radiographical examinations were performed, leading to the initial diagnosis of chronic periapical abscess. The patient's medical history was re‐evaluated. Advanced imaging and excisional biopsy were performed in order to confirm the final diagnosis. Regarding the presenting signs and symptoms of bilateral carious mandibular molars, a periapical inflammatory process was considered in the provisional diagnosis. A thorough examination and investigations were suggestive of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis (scrofula), and the patient underwent excision of the same. The clinician should consider the possibility of chronic granulomatous inflammatory lesions in the differential diagnosis of radiopaque lesions.     

Clinical “case series”: a concept analysis

Objectives

To analyze the concept of “case series” in the medical literature compared with case reports.

Methods

A PubMed search for articles published during 2009 which had “case series” in their title was performed. A total number of 621 articles were retrieved. 586 papers were included in the analysis and 35 were excluded (18 were commentary letters, 5 were not in English, and twelve could not be retrieved by our Library). The number of patients and category of these articles were analyzed.

Results

The median (range) of the number of cases of articles having “case series” in their title was 7 (1–6432) cases. 186/ 586 articles had less than 5 cases (31.7%, 95% CI (28.3–35.1%)). The median (range) of the number of cases of articles having “case report” as their publication type was 4 (1–178) cases. Out of the 219 articles categorized as case reports 114 (52.1%, 95% CI (45.6–58.6%)) had less than five cases.

Conclusions

The concept of “case series” is not well defined in the literature and does not reflect a specific research design. We suggest that a case series should have more than four patients while four paitents or less should be reported individually as case reports.