腓肠肌内侧头肌瓣移植结合负压引流治疗小腿软组织损伤

观察应用腓肠肌内侧头肌瓣转移结合负压引流治疗小腿毁损伤临床效果.应用腓肠肌内侧头肌移位肌瓣移植结合负压引流二期游离植皮12例,修复创面最大18 cm×10 cm,最小10 cm×6 cm.随访6～36个月.肌瓣全部成活,3例游离皮片少许坏死,经换药后愈合.术后肌瓣肿胀明显,半年后肢体外形恢复,1年后骨折愈合.下肢恢复负重行走.应用腓肠肌内侧头肌瓣转移负压吸引治疗小腿毁损软组织缺损骨外露创面可获得良好的临床疗效.     

近节指背筋膜蒂皮瓣在同指皮肤缺损中的应用

2007年5月至2009年2月,我院应用近节指背逆行筋膜蒂皮瓣修复同指中、远节掌侧或背侧皮肤缺损14例,术后皮瓣全部存活,外观质地佳,感觉功能恢复满意.     

Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing versus open reduction and locking plate fixation in treatment of middle and upper humeral fractures北大核心CSCD

Objective To compare closed reduction and intramedullary nailing versus open reduction and locking plate fixation in the treatment of middle and upper humeral fractures. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 62 patients with middle and upper humeral fracture who had been treated at Department of Orthopaedics, The First People's Hospital of Jinmen and at Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of PLA Central Theater from October 2017 to February 2021. There were 35 males and 27 females, aged from 27 to 86 years. The left side was affected in 24 cases and the right side in 38 cases. All fractures were fresh. According to the AO classification, 16 cases were type A, 32 type B, and 14 type C. Of the patients, 29 were treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nailing (intramedullary nail group) and 33 with open reduction and locking plate fixation (locking plate group). The length of incision, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing and complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. The pain degree was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) at one week and one month after operation, and the functional recovery of the shoulder was evaluated by Constant-Murley score at one month and 12 months after operation. Results There was no significant difference in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups, showing comparability (P>0.05). The intramedullary nail group was followed up for 12 to 29 months and the locking plate group for 15 to 50 months. In the intramedullary nail group, the length of incision [(4.1±0.7) cm], operation time [(58.3±7.7) min], intraoperative blood loss [(52.7±6.5) mL], and hospital stay [(7.3±1.5) d] were significantly less than those in the locking plate group [(21.7±2.3) cm, (95.8±11.7) min, (237.4±14.9) ml, and (12.3±1.7) d] (P<0.05). The fracture healing time in the intramedullary nail group was (5.0±1.9) months, significantly longer than that in the locking plate group [(3.5±1.7) months] (P<0.05). The VAS scores at one week and one month after operation in the intramedullary nail group [(2.8±0.3) points and (1.2±0.5) points] were significantly lower than those in the locking plate group [(4.3±0.4) points and (1.6±0.5) points], and the Constant-Murley score at one month after operation in the intramedullary nail group [(63.5±7.4) points] was significantly higher than that in the locking plate group [(54.3±6.9) points] (P<0.05). However, at 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the Constant-Murley score between the 2 groups (P>0.05). In both groups, the VAS score at one month after operation was significantly lower than that at one week after operation while the Constant-Murley score at 12 months after operation was significantly higher than that at one week after operation (P<0.05). In the intramedullary nail group, intraoperative distal refracture happened in one case; in the locking plate group, incision infection occurred in one case and postoperative radial nerve injury in another. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups [3.4% (1/29) versus 6.1% (2/33)] (P>0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of middle and upper humeral fractures, compared with open reduction and locking plate fixation, closed reduction and intramedullary nailing shows advantages of a smaller surgical incision, shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay and faster functional recovery. © The Author(s) 2022.