Validation of in vivo myocardial strain measurement by magnetic resonance tagging with sonomicrometry

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to validate strain measurements obtained using magnetic resonance tagging with spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM). We compared circumferential segment shortening measurements (%S) obtained using SPAMM to sonomicrometry %S in a canine model with (n = 28) and without (n = 3) coronary artery ligation. BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance tagging enables noninvasive measurement of myocardial strain, but such strain measurements have not yet been validated in vivo. METHODS: Circumferential sonomicrometry crystal pairs were placed in apical myocardium at ischemic risk in ligation studies and in adjacent and remote myocardium. The %S was obtained from closely juxtaposed sonomicrometry and SPAMM sites. RESULTS: Paired data were available from 19 of 31 studies. Both methods distinguished remote from ischemic function effectively (p = 0.014 for SPAMM and p = 0.002 for sonomicrometry). SPAMM %S was similar to sonomicrometry %S in ischemic myocardium (2 +/- 3 vs. 0 +/- 3 p = 0.067) but was slightly higher than sonomicrometry %S in remote myocardium (11 +/- 10 vs. 7 +/- 5, p = 0.033). End-systolic (n = 30) and late systolic (n = 34) SPAMM %S correlated well with sonomicrometry %S (r = 0.84, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.88, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance tagging using SPAMM can quantitate myocardial strain in ischemic and remote myocardium. This study validates its application in scientific investigation and clinical assessment of patients with myocardial ischemia.     

The Extent of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Can Predict Adverse Cardiac Outcomes in Patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Observational Study

ObjectiveThe clinical course of an individual patient with heart failure is unpredictable with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) only. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived myocardial fibrosis extent and to determine the cutoff value for event-free survival in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) who had severely reduced LVEF.Materials and MethodsOur prospective cohort study included 78 NICM patients with significantly reduced LV systolic function (LVEF < 35%). CMR images were analyzed for the presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, heart transplantation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge for major arrhythmia, and hospitalization for congestive heart failure within 5 years after enrollment.ResultsA total of 80.8% (n = 63) of enrolled patients had LGE, with the median LVEF of 25.4% (19.8–32.4%). The extent of myocardial scarring was significantly higher in patients who experienced MACE than in those without any cardiac events (22.0 [5.5–46.1] %LV vs. 6.7 [0–17.1] %LV, respectively, p = 0.008). During follow-up, 51.4% of patients with LGE ≥ 12.0 %LV experienced MACE, along with 20.9% of those with LGE ≤ 12.0 %LV (log-rank p = 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, LGE extent more than 12.0 %LV was independently associated with MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.71; 95% confidence interval, 2.54–17.74; p < 0.001).ConclusionIn NICM patients with significantly reduced LV systolic function, the extent of LGE is a strong predictor for long-term adverse cardiac outcomes. Event-free survival was well discriminated with an LGE cutoff value of 12.0 %LV in these patients.     

Adjunctive Cilostazol versus High Maintenance Dose of Clopidogrel in Patients with Hyporesponsiveness to Chronic Clopidogrel Therapy

Purpose

Whether addition of cilostazol is superior to increasing dose of clopidogrel in patients with hyporesponsiveness to chronic clopidogrel therapy is unknown.

Materials and Methods

We studied 73 patients with hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel on standard dual antiplatelet therapy for more than 2 weeks. Clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness was defined as percent inhibition of P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) <30% on VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Patients were randomly assigned to increased dose of clopidogrel (aspirin 100 mg+clopidogrel 150 mg daily: group A, n=38) or to receiving additional cilostazol (aspirin 100 mg+clopidogrel 75 mg+cilostazol 100 mg bid daily: group B, n=35).

Results

Baseline percent inhibition of PRU and PRU was similar between 2 groups (13.0±10.2% versus 11.8±9.7%, p=0.61, and 286.3±54.7 versus 295.7±53.7, p=0.44, respectively). At follow-up, percent inhibition of PRU was higher and PRU was lower significantly in group B than in group A (38.5±17.9% versus 28.3±16.6%, p=0.02, and 207.3±68.2 versus 241.3±76.7, p=0.050, respectively). Among those still showing hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel at follow-up (21 patients in group A, 10 patients in group B), 12 patients completed further crossover study. Compared to the baseline, magnitude of change in percent inhibition of PRU and PRU showed an improved tendency after the crossover (from 2.7±8.7% to 15.8±18.4%, p=0.08, and from -18.6±58.0 to -61.9±84.3, p=0.08).

Conclusion

Adjunctive cilostazol improved clopidogrel responsiveness better than the higher maintenance dose of clopidogrel in hyporesponsive patients with chronic clopidogrel therapy.