Cyclic guanosine 3'3' monophosphate concentrations in pre-eclampsia: effects of hydralazine

Objective To elucidate the role of the L-arginine: nitric oxide pathway in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
Participants Pregnant women (nulliparous, age < 25 years). Normotensive pregnancy (   n = 22  ) was defined when blood pressure remained at levels of < 120/80 mmHg and there was no proteinuria. Women with pre-eclampsia (   n = 22  ) had blood pressure measurements of > 140/90 mmHg and proteinuria of > 300 mg/l. Nonpregnant normotensive women (   n = 22  ) were studied as controls.
Study Design Blood samples were taken for measurements of ionised calcium, atrial natriuretic factor, cyclic guanosine 3'5'monophophate (GMP), arginine and asymmetric dimethylarginine. Urine samples were collected for determination of cyclic GMP excretion. Cyclic GMP concentrations were also determined in 12 women with severe pre-eclampsia before and after treatment with hydralazine.
Results L-arginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine and atrial natriuretic factor were not different in any group. Cyclic GMP concentrations in plasma [0.94 (SD 0.23) nM] as well as in urine [50.1 (SD15.7)μM] were increased significantly (   P < 0.05  ) in normal pregnancy compared to nonpregnant controls [plasma mean 0.46 (SD 0.12) nM and urine mean 18.4 (SD 10.3) μM], but not in the pre-eclampsia group [plasma mean 0.48 (SD 0.10) nM and urine mean 24.1 (SD 14.5) μM]. Concentrations of cyclic GMP in plasma and urine increased significantly (   P < 0.05  ) in women treated with hydralazine.
Conclusions The differences in cyclic GMP concentrations may reflect differences in nitric oxide production. Hydralazine increases cyclic GMP concentrations in severely pre-eclamptic women. This action could explain the antihypertensive effect of hydralazine.     

Efficacy of minor analgesics in primary dysmenorrhoea: a systematic review

Objective To quantify the efficacy and safety of naproxen, ibuprofen, mefenamic acid, aspirin and acetaminophen (paracetamol) in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea through a systemic overview of randomised controlled trials.
Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index were searched for randomised controlled trials. Efficacy was assessed by measurement of pain relief, requirement for rescue analgesics, restriction of daily life and absence from work or school. The rate ratios of side effects were used to assess safety.
Results Fifty-six trials describing 55 comparisons of analgesics with placebo and 12 direct comparisons with other analgesics met our inclusion criteria. Women taking naproxen were over three times more likely to have at least moderate pain relief than those taking placebo. Ibuprofen, mefenamic acid and aspirin were also superior to placebo but acetaminophen was not. The requirement for rescue analgesics, restriction of daily life and absence from work or school were less frequent with naproxen and ibuprofen than placebo but not with aspirin or acetaminophen. Direct comparisons did not show any difference between naproxen and ibuprofen. Side effects occurred more frequently only with naproxen when compared with placebo.
Conclusion Naproxen, ibuprofen, mefenamic acid and aspirin are all effective in primary dysmenorrhoea. Ibuprofen appears to have the most favourable risk-benefit ratio. Acetaminophen appears to be less effective than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but there was only one trial meeting our inclusion criteria and further studies are required.     

Randomised trial comparing the upright and supine positions for the second stage of labour

Objective To assess the maternal and neonatal effects of upright compared with recumbent positions during delivery, in terms of defined outcome variables.
Design A randomised controlled trial.
Setting St Monica's Nursing Home, a midwife based maternity unit in Cape Town, South Africa.
Participants Five hundred and seventeen women of low obstetrical risk assigned to deliver at the nursing home.
Results The trial showed that women who adopted the upright posture for delivery experienced less pain, perineal trauma and fewer episiotomies than those who delivered in the supine position.
Conclusion The data suggest that in women of low obstetrical risk, choice of posture during delivery may be encouraged.