Validation of a new immunoblot assay (LiaTek HIV III) for confirmation of human immunodeficiency virus infection

BACKGROUND: Used as a supplemental assay, new anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) immunoblots, employing recombinant and synthetic antigens, appeared to resolve the majority of samples with false-reactive Western blot results. Would it be possible to completely replace the Western blot by an immunoblot for confirmation and exclusion of HIV infection? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of the new LiaTek HIV III immunoblot assay (Organon Teknika, Turnhout, Belgium) was tested on 416 Western-blot positive samples (386 HIV-1, 22 HIV-2, 1 HIV-1/2, and 7 HIV-O) and on 45 HIV-1 seroconversion samples. The specificity was tested on 146 samples from noninfected donors with false-positive results on a HIV screening test. RESULTS: All Western- blot-positive samples tested positive in the immunoblot (sensitivity: 100%). The immunoblot could not discriminate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection in 22 of 416 (5%) samples. The LiaTek assay showed reactivity in 28 of 45 seroconversion samples, whereas the Western blot reacted in 30 of 45 seroconversion samples. With false-positive donor samples, the immunoblot was indeterminate in 10 of 146 samples (specificity: 93%), and the Western blot was indeterminate in 44 of 146 samples (specificity: 70%). CONCLUSION: Like the Western blot, the immunoblot runs the risk of missing samples that are reactive by enzyme immunoassay during the early stage of HIV infection. Nevertheless, considering its superior specificity on false-positive donor samples, it appears that the immunoblot offers a cost-effective alternative to the Western blot assay for confirmation and exclusion of HIV infection.     

Usefulness of thresholds for smear review of neutropenic samples analyzed with a Sysmex XN-10 analyzer

Neutropenia is one of the main criteria for a blood smear review. The objective of this study was to compare the thresholds proposed by the international consensus group for hematology review (1.0 10⁹/L) and the French speaking Group for Cellular Haematology (1.5 10⁹/L) in terms of the number of useless smears. We collected 112,097 analyzed samples from four laboratories equipped with XN instruments (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) during early 2016. The only exclusion criterion was a leucocyte count below 0.5 10⁹/L. In the absence of abnormal cells and/or morphology suggesting haematological disease, samples were classified as ‘negative for morphology’ and the differential from the XN-10 was reported. These smear procedures were considered as uninformative. Some 2202 samples met the criterion for neutropenia (<1.5 10⁹/L) for slide review representing 1.96% of the total. These included 1031 with neutropenia alone and 1171 neutropenia plus other abnormalities. Of the 1031 with neutropenia alone, 886 had a neutrophil count between 1.0 10⁹/L and 1.5 10⁹/L. The smear was uninformative for all of these samples. In conclusion, microscopic examination of a blood smear provided very limited information in cases of neutropenia without other abnormalities.     

Post-operative morbidity ensuing surgery for insular gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neurosurgical Review - The surgical resection of insular gliomas remains a challenge. Middle cerebral artery perforating arteries and deep functional pathways affect the extent of resection and the...