Aliskiren, a novel oral renin inhibitor, provides dose-dependent efficacy and placebo-like tolerability in Japanese patients with hypertension.

Aliskiren is a novel orally active renin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertension. This study evaluated the antihypertensive efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren in Japanese patients with hypertension. Forty hundred and fifty-five Japanese men and women with a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure of 95-110 mmHg were randomized to receive once-daily double-blind treatment for 8 weeks with aliskiren 75, 150 or 300 mg or placebo. Aliskiren produced significant, dose-dependent reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (p<0.0005 vs. placebo for each dose) and mean sitting systolic blood pressure (p<0.001 vs. placebo for each dose). The placebo-corrected reductions in mean sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure were 5.7/4.0, 5.9/4.5 and 11.2/7.5 mmHg in the aliskiren 75, 150 and 300 mg groups, respectively. After 8 weeks' treatment, 27.8%, 47.8%, 48.2% and 63.7% of patients in the placebo and aliskiren 75, 150 and 300 mg groups, respectively, achieved a successful treatment response (diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and/or reduced by > or =10 mmHg from baseline; p<0.005 vs. placebo for each dose). Aliskiren treatment was well tolerated, with the incidence of adverse events reported in the active treatment groups (53-55%) being similar to that in the placebo group (50%). This study, which is the first to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of aliskiren in Japanese patients with hypertension, demonstrates that the once-daily oral renin inhibitor aliskiren provides significant, dose-dependent reductions in blood pressure with placebo-like tolerability.     

Castleman disease: surgical cure in pediatric patients

Castleman disease is a rare disorder characterized by lymphoid hyperplasia which rarely manifests in children. We present 2 cases which highlight both histologic variants of this disease, and provide suggestions regarding workup and treatment with the goal of making practitioners aware of Castleman disease in the differential diagnosis of a child presenting with vague symptoms.     

Prospective study of short stature and newly diagnosed asthma in women.

The authors tested the hypothesis that short stature predicts adult-onset asthma independent of obesity among women in the Nurses' Health Study. Height, weight, and physician-diagnosed asthma were assessed with validated questionnaire items. Proportional hazard models adjusted separately for weight and body mass index. The rate of newly diagnosed asthma was 1.55 times greater in the shortest versus the tallest quintile after adjustment for weight (95% CI, 1.26-1.91). After adjustment for body mass index, the rate ratio was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.94-1.42). Short stature predicted adult-onset asthma in a large cohort of women, but this association was not independent of obesity.     

On the origins and development of evidence-based medicine and medical decision making

The aims of this paper are to identify the issues and forces that were the impetus for two recent developments in academic medicine, evidence-based medicine (EBM) and medical decision making (MDM); to make explicit their underlying similarities and differences; and to relate them to the fates of these innovations. Both developments respond to concerns about practice variation; the rapid growth of medical technology, leading to a proliferation of diagnostic and treatment options; the patient empowerment movement; and psychological research that raised questions about the quality of human judgment and decision making. Their commonalities include: use of Bayesian principles in diagnostic reasoning, and the common structure embedded in an answerable clinical question and a decision tree. Major differences include: emphasis on knowledge or judgment as the fundamental problem; the status of formal models and utility assessment; and the spirit and tone of the innovation. These differences have led to broader acceptance of EBM within academic medicine, while decision analysis, the fundamental tool of MDM, has been less welcomed in clinical circles and has found its place in guideline development, cost-effectiveness analysis, and health policy.