Clinical and Laboratory Signs as Dengue Markers During an Outbreak in Rio de Janeiro

Background  One of the main challenges for clinical research in dengue is the low validity of clinical diagnosis. Objective  To analyze clinical and laboratory data as predicitve factors of dengue diagnosis at Evandro Chagas Clinical Research Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, during the 2001–2002 dengue outbreak in Rio de Janeiro. Methods  Cross sectional study comparing clinical laboratory data collected from the National Information System for Compulsory Notification Diseases (SINAN) in two serologically confirmed groups: dengue D (N = 453) and non-dengue ND (N = 80). Results  Fever, exanthema, itching, mean platelet count < 150,000, WBC count < 4,000 and absence of vomiting and of abdominal pain help to distinguish D from ND groups. When considered individually, these signs and symptoms enhance diagnostic sensitivity and, when used in combination, improve specificity. Conclusion  A combination of symptoms not necessarily considered indicative of dengue diagnosis could improve surveillance and medical decision-making in simple clinical settings.     

Manual compression device for fluoroscopy

A device for manual compression and palpation during supine fluoroscopy has been designed. It enables effective use of the physiologic grasping and lever force potentials of the hand and wrist. The device permits optimal fluoroscopic palpation and compression techniques and prevents direct exposure to the lead-gloved hand.     

Isolated headache as the presenting clinical manifestation of intracranial tumors: a prospective study

Isolated headache as the presenting clinical manifestation of intracranial tumors: a prospective study. Cephalalgia 1994;1'4:270-1. Oslo. ISSN 0333-1024We prospectively studied over two years the incidence of headache as the initial and isolated clinical manifestation of adult patients suffering from intracranial tumors ( n = 183). Fifteen patients (8%) exhibited headache as their first and isolated clinical manifestation. Age, sex, neoplasm localization, or pathological diagnosis did not correlate with the presence of headache. Posterior fossa location and hydrocephalus, though not reaching statistical significance, were more frequent in patients who presented with headache as the first symptom. At the moment of diagnosis, 59 (31%) of the patients admitted to headache, though only I out of the 15 patients starting as headache still had this symptom as the only manifestation. From our experience in adults, isolated headache for longer than 10 weeks will only exceptionally be secondary to an intracranial neoplasm.     

个性化颅骨成形术中植入材料类型与颅骨缺损面积的关系

目的：分析个性化颅骨成形术中,植入材料类型与颅骨缺损面积的关系。 方法：选择解放军总医院第二附属医院神经外科2002-03/2005-01和河北省三河市医院神经外科2003-09/2005-04收治的资料齐全的计算机辅助设计颅骨成形术患者75例,分为嵌入性材料（骨水泥、硅橡胶）组40例,根据颅骨缺损面积又分为大面积（≥36cm2）组17例和小面积（〈36cm2）组23例;覆盖性材料（钛网）组35例,大面积组14例和小面积组21例。采用头颅CT超薄扫描（层厚1.5mm）,三维重建,模拟缺损颅骨补片,应用激光快速成形技术,制作缺损颅骨及颅骨补片模型,患者认可后,根据患者的病情应用硅橡胶、骨水泥、钛网作为植入材料,进行手术植入。术后1周观察并发症：头痛、积液、松动。 结果：75例患者的补片与颅骨完整适配,塑形满意,术中无需修整,平均手术时间45min,83%（63/75）患者感到基本或完全恢复了原有容貌。手术并发症：嵌入性材料组头痛4例,积液10例,松动2例,共16例,其中大面积组13例,小面积组3例;覆盖性材料组头痛1例,积液2例,松动0例,共3例次,其中大面积组2例,小面积组1例。应用精确概率分析,两材料组之间手术并发症差异显著,两材料组颅骨缺损面积之间手术并发症差异显著,嵌入性材料大面积组与覆盖性材料大面积组之间手术并发症差异显著,嵌入性材料小面积组与覆盖性材料小面积组之间手术并发症无显著性差异。 结论：个性化设计的颅骨修补材料,能够最大限度的恢复患者外形,缩短手术时间,大面积的颅骨缺损应用钛网修补,小面积的应用钛网和嵌入性材料修补。根据患者颅骨缺损面积,选择不同植入材料,可以提高手术疗效,减少术后并发症。     

Use of confirmatory factor analysis for the identification of new components of the metabolic syndrome: the role of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and Haemoglobin A1c

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study was aimed to identify additional components of metabolic syndrome from a set of cardiovascular risk markers. METHODS AND RESULTS: The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), von Willebrand factor, homocysteine, Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and lipoprotein(a) were assessed in a population-based sample of 902 nondiabetic adult subjects. Those biomarkers that were associated with metabolic syndrome were evaluated by multiple regression analysis, along with other traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the hypothesis that both the established components of metabolic syndrome and the novel variables identified by the regression analysis were associated with a single underlying factor. HOMA-IR, PAI-1 and HbA1c were the only biomarkers independently related to metabolic syndrome. CFA validated a one-factor model that included these variables. Moreover, the indices of goodness of fit were better for this expanded model than those obtained for a previously validated one-factor model that was restricted to the conventional elements of the syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that PAI-1 and HbA1c are singularly linked to metabolic syndrome. Their elevation is presumably another manifestation of the same pathophysiological mechanism that underlies the recognized traits of the syndrome.