Growth hormone regimens in Australia: analysis of the first 3 years of treatment for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature

Objective To investigate response to growth hormone (GH) in the first, second and third years of treatment for all idiopathic GH‐deficient (GHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS) patients in Australia. Context Eligibility for subsidized GH treatment in Australia is determined on auxological criteria for the indication of Short Stature and Slow Growth (SSSG), which includes ISS (SSSG‐ISS). The biochemical GHD (BGHD, peak GH < 10 mU/l) and SSSG indications are treated similarly: starting dose of 4·5 mg/m²/week with provision for incremental dosing. Some ISS patients were specifically diagnosed with familial short stature (SSSG‐FSS). Design Responses for each year of treatment for BGHD, SSSG‐ISS and SSSG‐FSS cohorts were compared in relation to influencing variables and with international benchmarks. The effect of incremental dosing was assessed. Patients Australian BGHD, SSSG‐ISS and SSSG‐FSS patients who had completed 1, 2, or 3 years of treatment and were currently receiving GH. Measurements Growth hormone dose, change in height‐standard deviation score (ΔSDS) and growth velocity (GV). Results First‐year response was 2–3 times greater than that in subsequent years: ΔSDS_{1st year} = 0·92, 0·50 and 0·46 for BGHD, SSSG‐ISS and SSSG‐FSS, respectively. Responses were similar to international reports and inversely related to age at commencement of GH. First‐year GV‐for‐age for BGHD patients was similar to international standards for idiopathic GHD. However, girls had an inferior response to boys when treatment commenced at <6 years of age. First‐year GV‐for‐age for SSSG‐ISS/FSS patients was less than ISS standards. Dose increments attenuated the first‐ to second‐year decline in response to BGHD but marginally improved the responses for SSSG‐ISS/FSS. Conclusions The Australian auxology‐based GH programme produces comparable responses to international programmes. A lower starting dose is offset by the initiation of treatment at younger ages. Incremental dosing does not appear optimal. A first‐year dose of 6·4–6·9 mg/m²/week for GHD and 8·9 mg/m²/week for ISS with early commencement of GH treatment may be most efficacious.     

以病人为中心的口腔科门诊数字化建设初探

目的：总结以病人为中心的口腔科门诊数字化建设的经验。方法：从诊疗手段、就医流程、医疗文书以及科室管理4个方面总结广州军区武汉总医院口腔科门诊数字化建设的概况。结果：2009年以来开始进行El腔科门诊的数字化建设,经过3年多的运行,科室工作流程优化明显,提高了工作效率和医疗服务质量。结论：科室的数字化建设有助于提高科室的工作效率和医疗服务质量,充分体现了”以病人为中心”这一理念。     

改良小梁切除术治疗伴有高眼压及大瞳孔的急性房角关闭

目的 评价改良小梁切除术治疗伴有高眼压及大瞳孔的急性房角关闭的临床疗效。方法收集2005年1月至2009年3月中山大学中山眼科中心青光眼专业实施改良小梁切除术治疗伴有高眼压及大瞳孔的急性房角关闭21例（21眼）的临床资料,对术后并发症及手术前后的眼压、视力、瞳孔等进行统计分析。 结果 术前眼压(48.25±3.14) mmHg,平均用降眼压药种类3.35种,明显高于出院时眼压(10.47±1.15)mmHg(t=11.4573,P＜0.01)及术后3个月眼压(13.86±0.93) mmHg(t=11.2641,P＜0.01)。出院视力(0.09±0.05)与术前视力(0.11±0.06)差异无统计学意义(沁0.8702,P= 0.3913),术后3个月视力(0.21±0.04)则稍好于术前（t=-2.7907,P=0.0112）。术前瞳孔垂直径(5.81±0.23) mm与出院时瞳孔垂直径(5.92±0.21 )mm差异无统计学意义（t=-1.5013,P=0.1672）。无严重并发症发生。 结论 改良小梁切除术是治疗伴有高眼压及大瞳孔的急性房角关闭的有效方法,术中分次放房水、巩膜瓣调节缝线、术毕形成前房等措施可有效减少严重并发症的发生。