Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis.

PURPOSE: To explore changes in physical and psychosocial function before and after breast cancer by age at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 122,969 women from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHS 2, ages 29 to 71 years, who responded to pre- and postfunctional status assessments were included; 1,082 women were diagnosed with breast cancer between 1992 and 1997. Functional status was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36). Mean change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores was computed across categories representing the combination of incident breast cancer (yes or no) and age at diagnosis (< or = 40, 41 to 64, or 65+ years). RESULTS: Compared with women < or = 40 years without breast cancer, women with breast cancer experienced significant functional declines. Young (age < or = 40) women who developed breast cancer experienced the largest relative declines in HRQoL (as compared with middle-aged and elderly women) in multiple domains including physical roles (-18.8 v -11.5 and -7.5 points, respectively), bodily pain (-9.0 v -2.7 and -2.7 points), social functioning (-11.3 v -4.3 and -4.4 points) and mental health (-3.1 v 0.0 and +0.4 points). Much of the decline in HRQoL among elderly (age > or = 65) women with breast cancer was age related. CONCLUSION: Young women may fare worse than middle-aged or elderly women in both physical and psychosocial dimensions after breast cancer diagnosis. The needs of women facing breast cancer may be better understood within a life stage framework.     

An individual patient-based meta-analysis of tamoxifen versus ovarian ablation as first line endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer

Increased dietary fat intake and rate of breastepithelial cell proliferation have each been associated withthe development of breast cancer. The goal ofthis study was to measure the effect ofa low fat, high carbohydrate diet on therate of breast epithelial cell proliferation in womenat high risk for breast cancer. Women wererecruited from the intervention and control groups ofa randomized low fat dietary intervention trial, breastepithelial cells were obtained by fine needle aspiration,and cell proliferation was assessed in these samplesusing immunofluorescent detection of Ki-67 and PCNA. Theeffects of needle size and study group oncell yield and cytologic features of the cellswere also examined. Fifty three women (20 inthe intervention group and 33 in the controlgroup) underwent the biopsy procedure. Slides from 38subjects were stained for Ki-67 and from 14subjects for PCNA. No cell proliferation (fluorescence) wasdetected for either Ki-67 or PCNA in anyof the slides. Epithelial cell yield and numberof stromal fragments were greater with a largerneedle size. Numbers of stromal fragments and bipolarnaked nuclei were greater in the low fatas compared to the control group but nodifferences in epithelial cell yield were observed betweenthe two groups. This study confirms that fineneedle aspiration biopsy is a feasible method ofobtaining epithelial cells from women without discrete breastmasses, but suggests that cell proliferation cannot beassessed using Ki-67 and PCNA in such samples.     

Randomized trial of two intravenous schedules of the topoisomerase I inhibitor liposomal lurtotecan in women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer: a trial of the national cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group.

PURPOSE: Liposomal lurtotecan (OSI-211) is a liposomal formulation of the water-soluble topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan (GI147211), which demonstrated superior levels of activity compared with topotecan in preclinical models. We studied two schedules of OSI-211 in a randomized design in relapsed ovarian cancer to identify the more promising of the two schedules for further study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer that was recurrent after one or two prior regimens of chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either arm A (OSI-211 1.8 mg/m(2)/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks) or arm B (OSI-211 2.4 mg/m(2)/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). The primary outcome measure was objective response, which was confirmed by independent radiologic review, and a pick the winner statistical design was used to identify the schedule most likely to be superior. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were randomized between October 2000 and September 2001. The hematologic toxic effects were greater on arm A than on arm B (grade 4 neutropenia, 51% v 22%, respectively), as was febrile neutropenia (26% v 2.4%, respectively). Of the 80 eligible patients, eight patients (10%) had objective responses; six responders (15.4%; 95% CI, 6% to 30%) were in arm A and two responders (4.9%; 95% CI, 1% to 17%) were in arm B. CONCLUSION: The OSI-211 daily for 3 days intravenous schedule met the statistical criteria to be declared the winner in terms of objective response. This schedule was also associated with more myelosuppression than the schedule of OSI-211 administered in arm B.     

Expression levels of TEL, AML1, and the fusion products TEL-AML1 and AML1-TEL versus drug sensitivity and clinical outcome in t(12;21)-positive pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: t(12;21)(p13; q22), present in approximately 25% of pediatric precursor B-ALL, is highly sensitivity to L-asparaginase and the prognosis depends on the intensity of the treatment protocol. This study analyzes the relationship between the mRNA expression of the genes and fusion products involved in t(12;21), in vitro sensitivity to prednisolone, vincristine, and L-asparaginase, and long-term clinical outcome in t(12;21)+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Long-term clinical outcome in 45 t(12;21)+ ALL patients was related to mRNA expression of TEL, AML1, TEL-AML1, and AML1-TEL, determined by real-time quantitative PCR, and the in vitro sensitivity to prednisolone, vincristine, and L-asparaginase, using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays. RESULTS: A significant approximately 3.5-fold lower TEL expression in t(12;21)+ compared with t(12;21)- ALL samples (P = 0.006) and normal controls (P = 0.004) was found. Expression of AML1 did not differ between t(12;21)+ and t(12;21)- ALL. However, AML1 expression in the leukemic cells was 2-fold higher compared with normal controls (P = 0.02). The TEL-AML1 fusion product was expressed in all t(12;21)+ cases, whereas the reciprocal fusion product AML1-TEL was expressed in only 76%. High expression levels of TEL-AML1 [hazard ratio (HR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.10-1.57; P = 0.003], AML1-TEL (HR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.99-12.40; P = 0.001) and AML1 (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P = 0.006) were associated with a poor long-term clinical outcome within t(12;21)+ ALL. Cellular drug resistance towards prednisolone, vincristine, and L-asparaginase could not explain this predictive value. Multivariate analysis including age and WBC showed that only high AML1-TEL expression is an independent poor prognostic factor in t(12;21)+ childhood ALL. CONCLUSION: High AML1-TEL expression is an independent poor prognostic factor in t(12;21)+ childhood ALL.     

Associations between polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and breast cancer risk.

Biological and epidemiologic data suggest that vitamin D levels may influence breast cancer development. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D and additionally interacts with other cell-signaling pathways that influence cancer development. Because functional data exist on FOK1 and previous studies have suggested a relation between BSM1 and breast cancer risk, we evaluated the associations of the FOK1 and BSM1 VDR polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. In a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study, we genotyped 1,234 incident cases (diagnosed between return of a blood sample in 1989-1990 and June 1, 2000) and 1,676 controls for FOK1, and 1,180 cases and 1,547 controls for BSM1. We observed a significantly increased risk of breast cancer among carriers of the ff genotype of FOK1 (multivariate odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence intervals, 1.06-1.69) compared with those with FF. We did not observe an association between polymorphisms in BSM1 and breast cancer risk (multivariate odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence intervals, 0.72-1.20) for BB versus bb). The FOK1 association did not vary significantly by menopausal status, estrogen, and progesterone receptor status of the tumors, or plasma levels of 25 hydroxyvitamin D or 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D. Our results suggest that the VDR may be a mediator of breast cancer risk and could represent a target for cancer prevention efforts.     

Data mining for signals in spontaneous reporting databases: proceed with caution

PURPOSE: To provide commentary and points of caution to consider before incorporating data mining as a routine component of any Pharmacovigilance program, and to stimulate further research aimed at better defining the predictive value of these new tools as well as their incremental value as an adjunct to traditional methods of post-marketing surveillance. METHODS/RESULTS: Commentary includes review of current data mining methodologies employed and their limitations, caveats to consider in the use of spontaneous reporting databases and caution against over-confidence in the results of data mining. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on more clearly delineating the limitations of the various quantitative approaches as well as the incremental value that they bring to traditional methods of pharmacovigilance.     

Fetal growth restriction: a modern approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fetal growth restriction is a complicated perinatal condition, with multiple causes. It shares common pathophysiologies with other important disorders, such as preeclampsia and abruption. As a group, these conditions associated with ischemic placental disease are responsible for a large percentage of indicated preterm births. The ability to accurately predict, diagnose and manage these pregnancies has significant and far-reaching implications, including potential effects on long-term adult health. RECENT FINDINGS: Placental ischemia is the most common cause of fetal growth restriction. Alterations in placental development are being linked to various angiogenic mediators, which may be of future use in early risk-determination. Until then, the use of ultrasound to accurately diagnose fetal growth restriction and time delivery is the mainstay of management. Research in this area has revealed some commonalities in the deterioration of the growth restricted fetus, but has also indicated that not every affected fetus will follow the same progression in Doppler and other wellbeing parameters. Most importantly, gestational age at delivery is consistently being documented as a critical factor in perinatal morbidity and mortality. SUMMARY: Fetal growth restriction is a late manifestation of early abnormal placental development. Once abnormal Doppler velocimetry is present, surveillance and timing of delivery should be based on the antepartum test results and on the gestational age.