Recommendation for hygiene and topical in neonatology from the French Neonatal Society

We sought to establish guidelines for hygiene care in newborns based on a systematic review of the literature and grading of evidence using the Groupe de Réflexion et d’Evaluation de l’Environement des Nouveau-nés (GREEN) methodology. We examined 45 articles and 4 reports from safety agencies. These studies recommend a tub bath (rather than a sponge bath) for full-term infants and a swaddle bath for preterm newborns. They also recommend against daily cleansing of preterm infants. The literature emphasized that hygiene care must consider the clinical state of the newborn, including the level of awareness and behavioral responses. Hospitalized newborns treated with topical agents may also experience high exposure to potentially harmful excipients of interest. Caregivers should therefore be aware of the excipients present in the different products they use. In high-resource countries, the available data do not support the use of protective topical agents for preterm infants.

Conclusions: We recommend individualization of hygiene care for newborns. There is increasing concern regarding the safety of excipients in topical agents that are used in neonatology. A multidisciplinary approach should be used to identify an approach that requires lower levels of excipients and alternative excipients.

Very preterm infant (< 32 weeks) vs very low birth weight newborns (1500 grammes): comparison of two cohorts]

Studies concerning very preterm newborns are either defined by birth weight (<1500 g) or gestational age (<32 weeks). The aim of our study was to underline limits of cohort definitions by birth weight. METHODS: Data come from the Nord Pas de Calais EPIPAGE cohort. Every birth occurring in 1997 before 32 weeks or with a birth weight less than 1500 g and transferred in a neonatal unit was included. Two cohorts were defined, one by gestational age (<32 weeks), the other by birth weight (<1500 g). Two subgroups could be defined from these to cohorts: group A (<32 weeks and > or =1500 g), from cohort (<32 weeks), group B (> or =32 weeks and <1500 g) from cohort (<1500 g). RESULTS: Five hundred nine newborns were included. Perinatal characteristics of both cohorts seemed comparable. The analysis by subgroups A and B revealed an excess of pulmonary and neurological morbidity in very preterm infant compared to very low birth weight newborn. This was linked to an excess of growth restricted newborns in this cohort with more advanced gestational ages. CONCLUSION: Cohorts of very preterm newborns should rather be defined by gestational age. If not possible, results in very low birth weight cohorts should also be given by gestational age and rate of growth restriction should be described.     

Rapid cortical motor output map changes assessed by the triple stimulation technique

The amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were mapped by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using the triple stimulation technique (TST) in 11 normal individuals. Stimuli were given while the subjects were (a) distracted, (b) concentrating on their target (recorded) hand, and (c) concentrating on their contralateral hand. Within seconds, the proportion of excited motor units increased, similarly in all subjects, by an average of 70% from (a) to (b), and by 48% from (a) to (c). At the optimal stimulation site, results obtained with the TST were compared to those of conventional MEPs. The TST proved superior in detecting the rapid changes of the motor output caused by the non-specific mental tasks studied.     

Neurodevelopment of children born very preterm and free of severe disabilities: the Nord‐Pas de Calais Epipage cohort study

Aim: To describe the development of very preterm children free of cerebral palsy or severe sensory impairment in the domains of gross and fine motor functions, language and sociability at a corrected age of 2 years; to identify factors associated with performances in each domain. Methods: A total of 347 children born in 1997 before 33 weeks of gestation, part of the EPIPAGE population‐based cohort study, had their psychomotor development assessed with the Brunet‐Lezine scale. Results: The study population had a mean gestational age of 30.1 ± 2.0 weeks. Lower developmental quotients (DQ) were observed in the study group compared to the reference sample (96 ± 13 vs 104 ± 8, p < 0.01). Fine motor function, language and sociability were all affected with a p value <0.01. Multivariate analysis showed that duration of intubation and parents’ educational and occupational levels were the only variables significantly related to each developmental domain (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Children very preterm and free of severe disabilities had mild delays in multiple areas of development. The mechanisms by which neonatal factors played a role need further investigation. However socioeconomic status had a great impact on development and our results underline the need for improved support of socioeconomically disadvantaged parents after a preterm birth.     

Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome for all infants born before 33 weeks gestation until discharge from hospital. DESIGN: A prospective observational population based study. SETTING: Nine regions of France in 1997. PATIENTS: All births or late terminations of pregnancy for fetal or maternal reasons between 22 and 32 weeks gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Life status: stillbirth, live birth, death in delivery room, death in intensive care, decision to limit intensive care, survival to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 722 late terminations, 772 stillbirths, and 2901 live births were recorded. The incidence of very preterm births was 1.3 per 100 live births and stillbirths. The survival rate for births between 22 and 32 weeks was 67% of all births (including stillbirths), 85% of live births, and 89% of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units. Survival increased with gestational age: 31% of all infants born alive at 24 weeks survived to discharge, 78% at 28 weeks, and 97% at 32 weeks. Survival among live births was lower for small for gestational age infants, multiple births, and boys. Overall, 50% of deaths after birth followed decisions to withhold or withdraw intensive care: 66% of deaths in the delivery room, decreasing with increasing gestational age; 44% of deaths in the neonatal intensive care unit, with little variation with gestational age. CONCLUSION: Among very preterm babies, chances of survival varies greatly according to the length of gestation. At all gestational ages, a large proportion of deaths are associated with a decision to limit intensive care.