Surface shield: device to reduce personnel radiation exposure

A simple device is described that can reduce personnel exposure from scatter radiation by up to 75%. The device consists of an oblong piece of shielding (0.75-mm lead equivalent) that is taped to the side of the patient during percutaneous renal stone removal and other interventional procedures. Contrary to other shields and barriers, this does not interfere with access to the patient. Scatter exposure data from phantom studies are presented and the rationale for surface shielding discussed.     

Prevalence of Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis and the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Bariatric Surgery Patients

Background  

Liver steatosis can progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and eventually to end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. We thus determined the prevalence of liver steatosis and fibrosis in patients undergoing bariatric surgery using liver biopsy. We also determined the suitability of ultrasound for diagnosis of liver steatosis with and without simultaneously considering patient characteristics.     

Bariatric surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis

BackgroundData regarding the management of bariatric patients with cirrhosis are scarce, and there is no strong evidence that supports a specific approach for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to review our experience with cirrhotic patients undergoing bariatric surgery.MethodsA prospectively maintained database was reviewed to assess the outcomes of bariatric surgery for patients with known cirrhosis and for patients with cirrhosis discovered at surgery (unknown cirrhosis).ResultsFrom April 2004 to September 2011, 23 patients (12 with known cirrhosis and 11 with unknown cirrhosis) met inclusion criteria. There were 14 females and 9 males with a mean age of 51.5±8.3 and a mean body mass index of 48.2±8.6 kg/m2. Child-Pugh classes were A (n = 22) and B (n = 1). Patients had a high frequency of diabetes (83%), dyslipidemia (61%), and hypertension (83%). Procedures performed were laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) (n = 14), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) (n = 8), and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (n = 1). Two patients underwent LSG successfully after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Mean length of hospital stay was 4.3±2.7 days. Complications developed in 8 patients. One patient died of unknown cause 9 months after surgery. No patients had liver decompensation after surgery. The patients lost 67.4%±30.9% of their excess weight at 12 months follow-up and 67.7%±24.8% at 37 months follow-up.ConclusionLRYGB and LSG can be performed without prohibitive complication rates in carefully selected patients with cirrhosis. In our experience, bariatric patients with cirrhosis achieved excellent weight loss and improvement in obesity-related co-morbidities.     

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity

Background The surgical treatment of obesity in the high-risk, high-body-mass-index (BMI) (>60) patient remains a challenge. Major morbidity and mortality in these patients can approach 38% and 6%, respectively. In an effort to achieve more favorable outcomes, we have employed a two-stage approach to such high-risk patients. This study evaluates our initial outcomes with this technique. Methods In this study, patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a first stage during the period January 2002–February 2004. After achieving significant weight loss and reduction in co-morbidities, these patients then proceeded with the second stage, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Results During this time, 126 patients underwent LSG (53% female). The mean age was 49.5 ± 0.9 years, and the mean BMI was 65.3 ± 0.8 (range 45–91). Operative risk assessment determined that 42% were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score (ASA) III and 52% were ASA IV. The mean number of co-morbid conditions per patient was 9.3 ± 0.3 with a median of 10 (range 3–17). There was one distant mortality and the incidence of major complications was 13%. Mean excess weight after LSG at 1 year was 46%. Thirty-six patients with a mean BMI of 49.1 ± 1.3 (excess weight loss, EWL, 38%) had the second-stage LRYGBP. The mean number of co-morbidities in this group was 6.4 ± 0.1 (reduced from 9). The ASA class of the majority of patients had been downstaged at the time of LRYGB. The mean time interval between the first and second stages was 12.6 ± 0.8 months. The mean and median hospital stays were 3 ± 1.7 and 2.5 (range 2–7) days, respectively. There were no deaths, and the incidence of major complications was 8%. Conclusion The staging concept of LSG followed by LRYGBP is a safe and effective surgical approach for high-risk patients seeking bariatric surgery.     

牛津单髁膝关节置换：长期结果

牛津膝置换是使用最广泛的膝关节单髁置换（UKR）。牛津膝在37年前开始应用,拥有一个全匹配的活动衬垫,因而磨损率非常低。牛津膝最主要的使用指征是膝关节前内侧骨关节炎,这种病人至少占所有需要行膝关节置换术患者的50％。由于这一系统的设计特点,传统UKR的反指征,如年龄、活动量、肥胖、髌股关节损害和软骨钙质沉着症等对于牛津膝均不是反指征。与全膝关节置换（TKR）相比,牛津膝提供更快的康复、更好的功能、更大的活动度和更好的术后满意度,发生并发症更少、程度更轻,病残率和死亡率更低。一个持续超过30年的研究显示在90％的病例中,牛津膝为患者终生提供了优或良的临床结果,且不需要翻修。在最近15年,牛津膝通过微创手术入路植入,涉及6000多例使用该入路牛津膝置换的9个研究报道显示,10年生存率约95％。在许多这样的研究中,医生们在拟行膝关节置换的患者中约50％使用了牛津单髁膝置换。     

Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension

Introduction

Studies on bariatric patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension are limited. The aim of this study was to review our experience in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension who had bariatric surgery.

Method

All cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery, from 2007 to 2017, were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Thirteen patients were included; eight (62%) were female. The median age was 54 years (interquartile range, IQR 49–60) and median BMI was 48 kg/m² (IQR 43–55). Portal hypertension was diagnosed based on endoscopy (n?=?5), imaging studies (n?=?3), intraoperative increased collateral circulation (n?=?2), and endoscopy and imaging studies (n?=?3). The bariatric procedures included sleeve gastrectomy (n?=?10, 77%) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n?=?3, 23%). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4). Three 30-day complications occurred including wound infection (n?=?1), intra-abdominal hematoma (n?=?1), and subcutaneous hematoma (n?=?1). No intraoperative or 30-day mortalities. There were 11 patients (85%) at 1-year follow-up and 9 patients (69%) at 2-year follow-up. At 2 years, the median percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) and total weight loss (TWL) were 49 and 25%, respectively. There was significant improvement in diabetes (100%), dyslipidemia (100%), and hypertension (50%) at 2 years after surgery.

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery in selected cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension is relatively safe and effective.

     

Transoral gastric volume reduction for weight management: technique and feasibility in 18 patients

BackgroundEndoluminal suturing to reduce the gastric volume might provide an additional option for the treatment of obesity. Potential advantages of a nonoperative endoluminal intervention include less pain, the ability to perform it as an outpatient procedure, and a high level of patient acceptance. The purpose of the present pilot study was to demonstrate the feasibility and procedural safety of transoral gastric volume reduction (TRIM procedure) using the Restore Suturing System in patients with a body mass index of 30–45 kg/m². Successful completion of the procedure and adverse events were evaluated at academic/university hospitals.MethodsThis was a nonrandomized feasibility study performed at 2 institutions. After institutional review board approval, the patients underwent the TRIM endoluminal gastric plication procedure with the Restore Suturing System (Restore device). Gastric plications were completed to approximate the anterior and posterior gastric walls to achieve restriction of the upper stomach. The number and location of successful plications were recorded, and patients were monitored for complications. The present report described the short-term procedural results (≤24 hours after the procedure) of the studied cohort.ResultsA total of 18 patients were enrolled in the present study. The TRIM procedure was successfully completed in all patients, with placement of 4–8 plications (average 6 per patient). The average procedure time was 125 ± 23 minutes, and no serious or significant procedure-related complications occurred. After the procedure, common patient complaints were nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort. The first 10 patients enrolled were kept overnight according to the study protocol, and the remaining 8 patients were discharged on the day of the procedure.ConclusionEndoluminal suturing using the TRIM procedure and the Restore device was technically feasible, and no serious or significant procedure-related complications were reported. Weight loss, co-morbidity improvement, and durability are under assessment.     

Minimally Invasive Approach to Esophagectomy

Background:

Recent advances in laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery have made it possible to perform esophagectomy using minimally invasive techniques. The aim of this report was to present our preliminary experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Methods:

We reviewed our experience on eight patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy using either laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic techniques from June 1996 to May 1997. Indications for esophagectomy included stage I carcinoma (5), palliative resection (1), Barrett''s with high grade dysplasia (1) and end stage achalasia (1).

Results:

The average age was 68 years (54-82). The surgical approach to esophagectomy included laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (n=4), thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (n=1), and laparoscopic mobilization with right mini-thoracotomy and intra-thoracic anastomosis (n=3). Conversion to mini-laparotomy was required in two patients (25%) to complete esophageal dissection and facilitate gastric pull-up. The mean operative time was 460 minutes. The mean intensive care stay was 1.9 days (range of 0-7 days) with a mean hospital stay of 13-8 days. Minor complications included atrial fibrillation (n=1), pleural effusion (n=2) and persistent air leak (n=1). Major complications included cervical anastomotic leak (n=1), and delayed gastric emptying requiring pyloroplasty (n=1). There was no perioperative mortality.

Conclusions:

This preliminary experience suggests that minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible in centers with experience in advanced minimally invasive surgical procedures. Further studies are necessary to determine advantages over open esophagectomy.     

Endoluminal procedures for bariatric patients: expectations among bariatric surgeons

BackgroundPrimary and revisional bariatric endoluminal procedures are currently being developed. Acceptable levels of risk and weight loss for these procedures have not yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expectations and concerns among bariatric surgeons regarding these procedures.MethodsThe American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Emerging Technologies Committee developed a questionnaire that was distributed to the membership. Risk tolerance was assessed with comparison to commonly performed endoscopic and bariatric procedures. The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) ranges were provided to assess the expectations for results 1 year after the procedure.ResultsA total of 214 responses were returned. The acceptable level of risk to achieve 10–20% EWL after primary and revisional procedures was equivalent to, or less than, that of a therapeutic endoscopic procedure for 81% and 76% of respondents, respectively. The acceptable level of risk to achieve 30–40% EWL after primary and revisional procedures was equivalent to that after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for 45% and 35% of respondents, respectively and equivalent to that after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for 8% and 22%, respectively. In addition, 62% of respondents responded that 10–30% EWL would be acceptable for revisional procedures, and 35% responded that 10–30% EWL would be acceptable after a primary procedure. The primary concern was unproven efficacy, followed by durability, poor weight loss, availability of equipment, and procedural risk. Finally, 58% would not be willing to recommend an endoluminal procedure until the efficacy has been established, regardless of the risk.ConclusionRisk tolerance and weight loss expectations among bariatric surgeons are different for primary and revisional endoscopic procedures. Most surgeons were unwilling to consider endoluminal procedures for their patients until the efficacy has been proven.