Structural basis for p50RhoGAP BCH domain–mediated regulation of Rho inactivation

Spatiotemporal regulation of signaling cascades is crucial for various biological pathways, under the control of a range of scaffolding proteins. The BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP Homology (BCH) domain is a highly conserved module that targets small GTPases and their regulators. Proteins bearing BCH domains are key for driving cell elongation, retraction, membrane protrusion, and other aspects of active morphogenesis during cell migration, myoblast differentiation, and neuritogenesis. We previously showed that the BCH domain of p50RhoGAP (ARHGAP1) sequesters RhoA from inactivation by its adjacent GAP domain; however, the underlying molecular mechanism for RhoA inactivation by p50RhoGAP remains unknown. Here, we report the crystal structure of the BCH domain of p50RhoGAP Schizosaccharomyces pombe and model the human p50RhoGAP BCH domain to understand its regulatory function using in vitro and cell line studies. We show that the BCH domain adopts an intertwined dimeric structure with asymmetric monomers and harbors a unique RhoA-binding loop and a lipid-binding pocket that anchors prenylated RhoA. Interestingly, the β5-strand of the BCH domain is involved in an intermolecular β-sheet, which is crucial for inhibition of the adjacent GAP domain. A destabilizing mutation in the β5-strand triggers the release of the GAP domain from autoinhibition. This renders p50RhoGAP active, thereby leading to RhoA inactivation and increased self-association of p50RhoGAP molecules via their BCH domains. Our results offer key insight into the concerted spatiotemporal regulation of Rho activity by BCH domain–containing proteins.

Small GTPases are molecular switches that cycle between an active GTP-bound state and an inactive GDP-bound state and are primarily involved in cytoskeletal reorganization during cell motility, morphogenesis, and cytokinesis (1, 2). These small GTPases are tightly controlled by activators and inactivators, such as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), respectively (3, 4), which are multidomain proteins that are themselves regulated through their interactions with other proteins, lipids, secondary messengers, and/or by posttranslational modifications (5–7). Despite our understanding of the mechanisms of action of GTPases, GAPs, and GEFs, little is known about how they are further regulated by other cellular proteins in tightly controlled local environments.The BNIP-2 and Cdc42GAP Homology (BCH) domain has emerged as a highly conserved and versatile scaffold protein domain that targets small GTPases, their GEFs, and GAPs to carry out various cellular processes in a spatial, temporal, and kinetic manner (8–15). BCH domain–containing proteins are classified into a distinct functional subclass of the CRAL_TRIO/Sec14 superfamily, with ∼175 BCH domain–containing proteins (in which 14 of them are in human) present across a range of eukaryotic species (16). Some well-studied BCH domain–containing proteins include BNIP-2, BNIP-H (CAYTAXIN), BNIP-XL, BNIP-Sα, p50RhoGAP (ARHGAP1), and BPGAP1 (ARHGAP8), with evidence to show their involvement in cell elongation, retraction, membrane protrusion, and other aspects of active morphogenesis during cell migration, growth activation and suppression, myoblast differentiation, and neuritogenesis (17–21). Aside from interacting with small GTPases and their regulators, some of these proteins can also associate with other signaling proteins, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, myogenic Cdo receptor, p38-MAP kinase, Mek2/MP1, and metabolic enzymes, such as glutaminase and ATP-citrate lyase (17–26). Despite the functional diversity and versatility of BCH domain–containing proteins, the structure of the BCH domain and its various modes of interaction remain unknown. The BCH domain resembles the Sec14 domain (from the CRAL-TRIO family) (16, 27, 28), a domain with lipid-binding characteristics, which may suggest that the BCH domain could have a similar binding strategy. However, to date, the binding and the role of lipids in BCH domain function remain inconclusive.Of the BCH domain–containing proteins, we have focused on the structure and function of p50RhoGAP. p50RhoGAP comprises an N-terminal BCH domain and a C-terminal GAP domain separated by a proline-rich region. We found that p50RhoGAP contains a noncanonical RhoA-binding motif in its BCH domain and is associated with GAP-mediated cell rounding (13). Further, we showed previously that deletion of the BCH domain dramatically enhanced the activity of the adjacent GAP domain (13); however, the full dynamics of this interaction is unclear. Previously, it has been reported that the BCH and other domains regulate GAP activity in an autoinhibited manner (18, 21, 29, 30) involving the interactions of both the BCH and GAP domains, albeit the mechanism remains to be investigated. It has also been shown that a lipid moiety on Rac1 (a Rho GTPase) is necessary for its inactivation by p50RhoGAP (29, 31), which may imply a role in lipid binding. An understanding of how the BCH domain coordinates with the GAP domain to affect the local activity of RhoA and other GTPases would offer a previously unknown insight into the multifaceted regulation of Rho GTPase inactivation.To understand the BCH domain–mediated regulation of p50RhoGAP and RhoA activities, we have determined the crystal structure of a homologous p50RhoGAP BCH domain from S. pombe for functional interrogation. We show that the BCH domain adopts an intertwined dimeric structure with asymmetric monomers and harbors a unique RhoA-interacting loop and a lipid-binding pocket. Our results show that the lipid-binding region of the BCH domain helps to anchor the prenylation tail of RhoA while the loop interacts directly with RhoA. Moreover, we show that a mutation in the β5-strand releases the autoinhibition of the GAP domain by the BCH domain. This renders the GAP domain active, leading to RhoA inactivation and the associated phenotypic effects in yeast and HeLa cells. The released BCH domain also contributes to enhanced p50RhoGAP–p50RhoGAP interaction. Our findings offer crucial insights into the regulation of Rho signaling by BCH domain–containing proteins.     

Effect of statins on the development of renal dysfunction

Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) decrease serum cholesterol. Dyslipidemia is believed to be associated with the development of renal dysfunction. It was postulated that statins may reduce the development of renal dysfunction. The effect of statin use on the development of renal dysfunction in 197,551 patients (Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Integrated Service Network 16 [VISN16] database) was examined. Of these patients, 29.5% (58,332 patients) were statin users and 70.5% (139,219 patients) were not. Development of renal dysfunction was defined as doubling of baseline creatinine or increase in serum creatinine > or =0.5 mg/dl from the first to last measurement with a minimum of 90 days in between. During 3.1 years of follow-up, 3.4% of patients developed renal dysfunction. After adjustment for demographics, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, and other medications (mainly angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and aspirin), use of statins decreased the odds of developing renal dysfunction by 13% (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 0.92, p <0.0001). The beneficial effect of statins appeared to be independent of the decrease in cholesterol. Other variables that affected the development of renal dysfunction were age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.04, p <0.0001), diabetes (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.68 to 1.86, p <0.0001), hypertension (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.2, p = 0.0153), and smoking (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.24, p = 0.0244). In conclusion, statin use may retard the development of renal dysfunction. The beneficial effect of statins in preventing the development of renal dysfunction appears to be independent of their lipid-lowering effect.     

Rifaximin,a pregnane X receptor (PXR) activator regulates apoptosis in a murine model of breast cancer

The present study was proposed to investigate the effect of rifaximin (RFX) on methyl nitrosourea (MNU) induced mammary gland carcinoma in albino wistar rats. Animals were randomized and divided among four groups of six animals each. Group I (control 0.9% normal saline, 3 ml kg⁻¹, p.o.); Group II (toxic control, MNU 47 mg kg⁻¹, i.v.); Group III (RFX, 25 mg kg⁻¹, p.o.); Group IV (RFX, 50 mg kg⁻¹, p.o.). Toxicity was induced by single i.v. injection of MNU. MNU treatment was evident with increased alveolar bud count, differentiation score, up-regulated inflammatory enzyme markers (COX, LOX, NO and H₂S) and oxidative stress markers (TBAR''s, protein carbonyl, SOD, catalase and Ach). The mammary gland surface architecture was studied using SEM, carmine staining and H&E staining. The treatment with RFX elicited noticeable restoration of the overall histological architecture in the experimental animals similar to the control. In the MNU treated toxic group, the levels of oxidative stress markers significantly increased in comparison to the control, which was subsequently restored after RFX treatment. Furthermore, RFX up regulated the levels of caspase 3 and caspase 8, when compared to the MNU treated animals. MNU associated toxicity was also ascertained, when determined for UCHL-1, COX, NF-κBp65, BAD, and BCL-xl expression, while RFX demonstrated modulation of the same.

The present study was proposed to investigate the effect of rifaximin (RFX) on methyl nitrosourea (MNU) induced mammary gland carcinoma in albino wistar rats.     

Changes in Caries Experience,Untreated Caries,Sealant Prevalence,and Preventive Behavior Among Third-Graders in New York State, 2002–2004 and 2009–2012

ObjectiveThis study assessed changes in caries experience, untreated caries, sealant prevalence, and preventive behavior among third-grade children in New York State to monitor progress toward state health objectives.MethodsWe analyzed children''s data from the 2002–2004 (n=10,865) and 2009–2012 (n=6,758) New York State Oral Health Survey. We calculated differences in weighted percentages and 95% confidence intervals for caries experience, untreated caries, sealant prevalence, and preventive behavior. We used logistic regression procedures to assess the independent effects and interaction terms on dental caries experience.ResultsThe percentage of children with dental caries and untreated caries decreased from 54.1% and 33.0% in 2002–2004 to 45.2% and 23.6% in 2009–2012, respectively. While this decrease was not uniform across income subgroups, the prevalence of sealants, a key measure of the use of preventive services, increased significantly from 16.7% to 36.0% among lower-income children.ConclusionsMeasurable improvement in reducing dental caries prevalence among third-grade children has been made in New York State, but this improvement was not uniform across subgroups. Specifically, disease prevalence among lower-income children remained high, underscoring the need to strengthen existing programs and identify additional policy and programmatic interventions.Researchers generally agree that the prevalence and severity of dental caries among U.S. and New York State (NYS) school-age children declined steadily from the 1970s to the 1990s. Although this trend has continued for older children in more recent years, this trend is uncertain among younger children aged 2–8 years.^1–3 Findings from analyses of 1988–1994 and 1999–2004 national surveys show that declines in dental caries observed in earlier decades among younger children may have plateaued or dental caries may even be increasing among subgroups of younger children.⁴ Because of the persistent higher disease rate, especially in low-income groups, prevention of tooth decay among children has become the focus of many prevention efforts.^5,6 Since 2001, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Health Resources and Services Administration have provided grants and technical assistance to NYS to strengthen the infrastructure and capacity to promote fluoridation and improve its quality, as well as to strengthen school-based preventive and early treatment programs.Changes have also been made to increase insurance coverage for dental services and improve annual dental visits.^7,8 Child Health Plus, the state Children''s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), was implemented in 1997 to provide public health insurance for near-poor children from families previously not eligible for Medicaid. According to a U.S. Government Accounting Office report, nationally, Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries, children in particular, showed increases in the use of dental services (from 28% in 1996 to 37% in 2010), but still visited the dentist less frequently than privately insured children (58% in 2010).⁹ In NYS, the Medicaid program enhanced the fee structure for dental procedures in 2000. In addition, professional organizations, advocacy groups, and foundations have made a concerted effort to promote prevention and access to care. The professional recommendation to initiate first dental visit shifted from age 3 to age 1 around 2003.¹⁰ To assess the collective effect of these and other efforts in NYS, we examined data on caries experience, untreated caries, sealant prevalence, and preventive behavior among third-grade children from the 2002–2004 and 2009–2012 NYS Oral Health Survey.