Treatment of premature ejaculation: New drugs and treatment strategies

This review discusses treatment options for men with premature ejaculation (PE), a common sexual dysfunction characterized by short ejaculatory latency, decreased sexual satisfaction, and distress. For a number of reasons, including embarrassment and the belief that PE is a normal part of aging, that it has no effective treatment, or that it will resolve itself, few men with PE seek treatment. Although several treatment options exist (eg, behavioral, cognitive, and sex therapy methods; desensitizing drugs; off-label use of antidepressants, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, or à-blockers), the majority of men with PE are not satisfied with their results. New pharmacologic drugs develped specifically for the treatment of PE are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. For example, recent clinical research studies have revealed on-demand administration of one such drug, dapoxetine, which achieved significant improvements in ejaculatory latency, control over ejaculation, and satisfaction with sexual intercourse. In addition, partners of men who received dapoxetine likewise reported improved satisfaction with sexual intercourse. Future studies may reveal that integration of pharmacologic drugs with psychologic and/or behavioral therapy techniques may be the optimal approach to the management of PE. PE is a treatable condition, and new drugs in development may provide benefits over those available.     

Dietary Tryptophan Reverses Alcohol-induced Impairment of Facial Recognition But Not Verbal Recall

The present study demonstrates that alcohol-induced memory impairment can be attenuated by pretreatment with an oral tryptophan supplementation. These results provide support for the role of a brain serotonin deficit in this impairment and highlight the impact a dietary manipulation can have on a complex behavioral process.     

Patients with prosthetic joints: Are they at risk when receiving invasive dental procedures?

Most prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are due to wound contamination at the time of surgery. Some infections occur due to the hematogenous spread of bacteria from distant sites of infection. A review of the literature fails to associate PJI with transient bacteremias from invasive dental procedures. Several authors have described conditions which, they believe, render patients with prosthetic joints more at risk for infection. Prosthetic joint patients with these "high risk" conditions have the same types of infecting organisms as other patients with PJI. This indicates that the infecting bacteria are from wound contamination or distant sites of infection and not related to dental procedure bacteremias. Based on this review, antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated for patients with prosthetic joints when receiving invasive dental procedures, since there is no proven benefit and there are known risks involved with the use of antibiotics. However, the American Dental Association (ADA) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), in an advisory statement, suggest prophylaxis for "high risk" patients. The ADA and AAOS recommend a single dose of amoxicillin, cephradine, or clindamycin when prophylaxis is selected. The dentist is ultimately responsible for making treatment recommendations for his or her patients.     

Facilitating Perinatal Grieving Between the Mother and the Father

Society often expects mothers and fathers to share equally in the perinatal grief process because the child was a common bond between them. Unfortunately, in perinatal grief, this is not always the case. The mother and the father can experience incongruent grieving and use discordant coping mechanisms. It is important to evaluate these differences to facilitate communication between the distraught parents. Improved communication can in turn facilitate the grieving process.     

Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of clonazepam and alprazolam for panic disorder

To test the reported antipanic efficacy of clonazepam, the authors randomized 72 subjects with panic disorder to 6 weeks of treatment with either alprazolam, clonazepam, or placebo. Endpoint analysis demonstrated a significant beneficial effect of both active treatments, but not placebo treatment, on the frequency of panic attacks, overall phobia ratings, and the extent of disability. Comparison of the two active treatments revealed no significant differences and no consistent tendency for one agent to be favored over another, although power to detect small differences was limited. Sedation and ataxia were the most common side effects reported, but these effects were mild and transient and did not interfere with treatment outcome. The results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial are consistent with previous reports of clonazepam's antipanic efficacy.