Spilled Gallstones: the Source of an Enigma

Spillage of gallstones may occur in the course of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The incidence of this mishap and its consequences are variable. Ignored by many surgeons, stone spillage may be the source of significant morbidity many years after surgery. In this report, we describe the clinical course of a patient who presented with upper abdominal pain and swelling. The past history was positive for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 15 years earlier. After excision, the swelling was found to be a pseudocyst formed around spilled gallstones during a previous cholecystectomy. Apart from postoperative wound infection, the patient recovered well and remains so. Here, we discuss the problem and provide suggestions for spillage prevention and stone retrieval once spillage occurs.     

Where's the Beef? The Promise and the Reality of Clinical Documentation

Physician-generated emergency department clinical documentation (information obtained from clinician observations and summarized decision processes inclusive of all manner of electronic systems capturing, storing, and presenting clinical documentation) serves four purposes: recording of medical care and communication among providers; payment for hospital and physician; legal defense from medical negligence allegations; and symptom/disease surveillance, public health, and research functions. In the consensus development process described by Handler, these objectives were balanced with the consideration of efficiency, often evaluated as physician time and clinical documentation system costs, in recording the information necessary for their accomplishment. The consensus panel session participants and authors recommend that 1) clinical documentation be electronically retrievable; 2) selection and implementation be evidence-based and grounded on valid metrics (research is needed to identify these metrics); 3) the user interface be crafted to promote clinical excellence through high-quality information collection and efficient charting techniques; 4) the priorities for integration of clinical information be standardized and implemented within enterprises and across health and information systems; 5) systems use accepted standards for bidirectional, real-time clinical data exchange, without limiting the location or number of simultaneous users; 6) systems fully utilize existing electronic sources of specific patient information and general medical knowledge; 7) systems automatically and reliably capture appropriate data that support electronic billing for emergency department services; and 8) systems promote bedside documentation and mobile access.     

Brucellosis of the spine

Eight cases of spinal brucellosis are included in this study. Diagnosis was established by positive serology. Back pain was the most common complaint. Functional disturbance in walking was observed in three cases; in two others this was because of impairment of cord function. Clinical hepatosplenomegaly was found in one case. Subclinical organomegaly was diagnosed in two other patients. Psoas abscess was identified by computed tomographic scan in two separate cases. Response to drug therapy and surgical decompression, when indicated, resulted in complete recovery in all patients.     

Sustained Release Coprecipitates and Matrix Tablets of Ibuprofen with Polyacrylic Resin Ⅱ:Formulation and in vitro Evaluation

将药物及高分子材料溶于乙醇后边搅拌边加入非溶剂制成布洛芬－聚丙烯酸树脂Ⅱ共沉淀物。通过Ａ、Ｂ两种方法并以不同的药物－聚丙烯酸树脂Ⅱ比例制成了共沉淀物，再以这些共沉淀物直接压片制成骨架片。通过差热分析（ＤＳＣ）、扫描电镜（ＤＳＣ）及红外光谱（ＩＲ）研究了共沉淀物的性质。研究主要集中在处方中高分子材料所占的比例，溶出介质的ｐＨ及制备共沉淀物的方法对布洛芬从骨架中释放的影响。体外溶出实验分别在不同的ｐＨ条件下进行。处方研究表明随着聚丙烯酸树脂Ⅱ用量的增加，药物的释放过程显著延长。另外，增加溶出介质的ｐＨ会显著增加药物的累积释放百分数。此外实验还表明以方法Ｂ制成的共沉淀物的骨架片中药物的累积释放百分数要高于Ａ法制成的骨架片，然而方法Ａ中制得的骨架片中药物的释放却更接近于线性释放。     

Comorbidities in head and neck cancer: agreement between self-report and chart review.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of self-reported comorbidities compared with medical record review and the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with accuracy of self-reported comorbidities. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective study of 458 newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients using self-administered questionnaire and medical chart review data. Overall and itemwise consistency between self-report and chart review was evaluated. Social, clinical, and demographic characteristics of consistent versus inconsistent responders were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of patients had at least one comorbidity. There was good overall consistency between self-report and chart review (kappa = 0.50). Compared with consistent responders, inconsistent responders were found to be older (P < 0.05), have lower sleep (P < 0.05) and physical activity scores (P < 0.05), be more depressed (P < 0.05), and have more severe comorbidities (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Self-report may be considered as an alternative to chart review for comorbidity assessment in head and neck cancer patients. Younger patients, those with good general health, fewer depressive symptoms, and mild comorbidities, are more likely to give responses consistent with chart review.