Confidants' feedback and traumatic life events

One hundred six undergraduate (83 women and 23 men) completed surveys concerning their most traumatic life event, the feedback they received following their disclosure of the event to others, and how they felt after the disclosure. Results indicated that the better they felt after disclosure, the less disturbed they were by thoughts of the event at the time of the study. In addition, the more personal the trauma was, the worse they felt after their disclosure, and the more disturbed they were about the trauma. However, no significant relation existed between the positivity (e.g., supportiveness) of their confidant's feedback and their present degree of disturbance. Implications for understanding the complex relation between confiding traumatic events and resolving feelings surrounding those events were discussed.     

The thyrotropin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone as a predictor of response to treatment in depressed outpatients.

We evaluated the predictive value of the thyrotropin (TSH) response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in 32 depressed outpatients completing a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of s-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe), which failed to show any significant difference between SAMe and placebo. Treatment response was defined as the change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24) score between baseline and the end of the six-week trial. Subjects with TSH response outside the normal range (7-25 uU/ml) had a significantly greater response than patients with a normal response. There was also a significant correlation between absolute deviations from the mean TSH response (16 uU/ml) and changes in HRSD-24 scores.     

The Angelchik antireflux device: a 5-year experience.

A total of 44 patients had an Angelchik antireflux prosthesis inserted over a 5-year period. Of these, 41 were available for review and were assessed by interview using a modified Visick grading. Of the 23 patients followed up for a minimum of 3 years 74% had an excellent or satisfactory outcome; 92% of patients with symptoms of reflux obtained relief, but less than 50% of those patients presenting with dysphagia had a satisfactory outcome. The incidence of mild postoperative dysphagia increased the longer the period of follow-up. The main cause of a Visick 3 or 4 result was prosthesis migration. We have modified our technique of insertion to reduce these complications, and in a more recent series have achieved a Visick Grade 1 or 2 in up to 92% of patients. We conclude that dysphagia is a relative contraindication to the insertion of the Angelchik prosthesis. Our recent results encourage the use of the prosthesis provided steps are taken to reduce the incidence of migration and pericapsular fibrous tissue formation.