Needle phobia and stress-reducing medical devices in pediatric and adult chemotherapy patients.

Needle phobia--fear of medical devices--is a significant problem in pediatric and adult chemotherapy patients. Stress-reducing medical devices is a new, effective cognitive therapy for needle phobia. Twenty-five pediatric and 25 adult chemotherapy patients were randomly exposed to conventional or stress-reducing decorated butterfly needles and syringes. Emotional stress responses were determined with the Visual Aversion Scale, Visual Analogue Fear Scale, Visual Analogue Anxiety Scale, and Visual Overall Stress Score for each needle and syringe design. Sixty-eight percent of the pediatric and 52% of the adult patients were overtly needle phobic, but children demonstrated significantly more aversion and stress (P < .001). Stress-reducing medical devices effectively and significantly reduced aversion, anxiety, fear, and overall stress, and were 76% effective in preventing overt needle phobia in children and 92% effective in adults (P < .001). One hundred percent of children and adults felt that stress-reducing medical devices should be available in chemotherapy clinics. Needle phobia and stress in pediatric and adult chemotherapy patients are significantly reduced by the use of stress-reducing medical devices.     

Surveillance and epidemiology of MRSA bacteraemia in the UK

Surveillance of bacteraemia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the UK has involved collection of data from hospital microbiology laboratories via several mechanisms, including a voluntary reporting scheme that has been operational in England and Wales since 1989 and mandatory reporting schemes that have been running independently in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland since 2001. In addition, surveillance schemes involving panels of participating sentinel laboratories that submit isolates for centralized susceptibility testing, such as the Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Programme run by the BSAC, have also been established. Each of these data sources have particular advantages, but they also have their individual limitations, with the result that they each give an incomplete picture if considered in isolation. However, by pooling the findings from these different but complementary surveillance programmes, a much more comprehensive and credible picture of the problem posed by MRSA is produced. These schemes have shown both a dramatic rise in the total numbers of cases of S. aureus bacteraemia reported annually and an increase in the proportion of such cases that involve MRSA (from 2% in 1990 to >40% in the early 2000s), although the most recent data indicate a slight reversal of these trends. Characterization of isolates of MRSA shows a marked temporal relationship between the rise in MRSA bacteraemias and the emergence and spread of two strains of epidemic MRSA, EMRSA-15 and EMRSA-16. Surveillance and control of MRSA infection continue to be high profile and further developments to the mandatory surveillance system in England are likely in the near future.     

Active learning in nursing education (ALINE): New model for teaching and learning

Traditional teaching and learning pedagogical models do not adequately address the needs of students and often present substantial barriers to incorporating the benefits of technology enhanced learning. Active learning in nursing education (ALINE) is a practical teaching and learning model that: (a) provides a well-defined framework for accurate assessment of learning outcomes/objectives by requiring each outcome and/or objective be linked to an identified primary nursing competency; (b) identifies and defines the core components of a course (elements, objects and modules) and provides a framework for development of each of the components; (c) requires active learning principles be applied to every action taken by the learner throughout the course. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the ALINE learning model and the first virtual conference on aging that was held between 21 April to 2 May 2003.     

Comparison of psychological and physical function in neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain: Implications for cognitive behavioral pain management programs

Research has increased our understanding of the psychological and physical functioning associated with persistent pain and has facilitated the development of cognitive behavioral pain management programs to help improve people’s physical function and decrease their distress in the presence of persistent pain. The majority of this research has focused on nociceptive pain or pain of mixed etiology. There has been less focus on these aspects of neuropathic pain. It is possible that differences exist in the function and difficulties associated with nociceptive and neuropathic pain. These differences may be associated with our clinical observation that some people with neuropathic pain have difficulty applying some aspects of the theory and practice of cognitive behavioral pain management. The purpose of this study was to compare a single neuropathic pain condition (post-herpetic neuralgia) with a persistent pain of nociceptive origin (low back pain) and determine whether differences exist in: (1) physical and psychological function; (2) factors that increase difficulties; (3) responses to pain; (4) beliefs about pain and (5) problems experienced. The results suggest that the differences between the two groups were not on the major variables of pain, mood, cognition and physical function. The main differences were in factors that increase pain, people’s responses to pain, their beliefs about diagnosis and the cause of pain and the problems they reported as a result of experiencing pain. The implications of our findings for the development of cognitive behavioral pain management programs for people with neuropathic pain are discussed.     

Is there a best approach for extracorporeal life support cannulation: a review of the extracorporeal life support organization

Background

Neurologic complications are common, and amongst the most devastating complications in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Carotid artery cannulation (CAN) has been associated with an increase in these complications, thereby shaping practices to avoid this approach in most pediatric patients in which other cannulation approaches are viable.