Restriction of cell lysis by homologous complement: II. Protection of erythrocytes against lysis by newly activated complement

Our previous work revealed that homologous complement (C) was ineffective in lysing antibody-sensitized erythrocytes (EA) even at high concentrations. It was also shown that activation of complement on homologous EA resulted in the binding of C9 and the formation of EA bearing complement proteins C1 through C9 (EAC1-9), yet few hemolytic sites were formed. Instead, as shown here, the formation of homologous EAC1-9 caused the cells to become resistant to lysis even by heterologous complement during a second incubation. In contrast, when homologous EAC1-8 were produced by incubating EA with C9-depleted serum, such intermediates were not protected against lysis by heterologous complement during a second incubation. Furthermore, homologous C9 on EAC1-9 was able to reduce the hemolytic efficiency of heterologous complement without blocking C activation and the formation of new C5b-9 complexes. Protection was not modified when homologous EAC1-9 were produced in one step, by incubation of EA with serum, or sequentially by adding C9 to EAC1-8. The minimum number of 9-sites required to confer a protective effect on EAC1-9 was less than 200 per cell. Thus, in addition to its known effect in heterologous cell killing, homologous C9 is capable of protecting homologous cells against inadvertent complement lysis.     

Growth characteristics of circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells from patients with essential thrombocythemia

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from five patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) were cultured in vitro to evaluate restricted megakaryocytic (CFU-Meg), myeloid (CFU-GM), and erythroid (BFU-E) progenitor cell development. Varying concentrations of aplastic canine serum served as the source of megakaryocyte colony-stimulating activity, and cultured megakaryocyte ploidy distributions were determined by Feulgen staining and microfluorometry. Megakaryocyte colony growth was strikingly abnormal in all five patients evaluated. Four of the 5 had a marked expansion in the concentration of circulating CFU-Meg and 3 of 4 manifested abnormalities in cultured megakaryocyte colony size (2 unusually large and 1 small). Unstimulated megakaryocyte colony growth was substantially increased in three patients. However, the fraction of megakaryocyte progenitors in cell cycle was near or below normal in all instances. Endomitotic megakaryocyte development was disordered in each of the four ET patients in whom it was evaluable. In normal subjects, mean megakaryocyte ploidy values vary biphasically with aplastic canine serum concentration and peak at 13.2 N following 12 to 15 days of culture. In contrast, day 12 mean ploidy values in cultures from the ET patients remained low at all aplastic canine serum concentrations and reached a maximum averaging only 8.4 N. Three patients were evaluated serially at extended culture durations of up to 21 days. The cultured megakaryocyte ploidy was unchanged during this interval for two of the patients. For the third patient, ploidy increased steadily, reaching abnormally high ploidy values by day 21. Progenitor cell expansion was limited to the megakaryocyte line in three patients. However, two patients had substantial increases in CFU-GM, one of whom also had a marked increase in BFU-E. There was no significant unstimulated colony growth by either CFU-GM or BFU-E. These data indicate that ET is usually characterized by an expansion in the concentration of circulating CFU-Meg in vivo which manifest both disordered replication and endoreduplication in vitro.     

Platelet alpha-granule and plasma membrane share two new components: CD9 and PECAM-1

CD9 (p24) and PECAM1 (CD31) antigens are well-defined components of the platelet plasma membrane. Both are integral glycoproteins (GPs) implicated in the adhesive and aggregative properties of human platelets. In the present report, we have investigated their subcellular localization using immunoelectron microscopy. The monospecificity of the two polyclonal antibodies used was confirmed by immunoblotting. On normal resting platelets, immunolabeling for CD9 and PECAM1 was found lining the plasma membrane and the luminal face of the open canalicular system. Some labeling was also consistently found on the alpha-granule limiting membrane. This was confirmed by double labeling experiments in which fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor (vWF) were used as alpha-granule markers. CD9 and PECAM-1 were found lining the membrane of the same granules that contained fibrinogen and vWF in their matrix. CD9 and PECAM-1 thus appear to have an intracellular distribution identical to GPIIb-IIIa, a major aggregation platelet receptor. To rule out a cross-reactivity of the two polyclonal antibodies with GPIIb/IIIa, we studied PECAM1 and CD9 expression on the platelets from a patient with type I Glanzmann's thrombasthenia whose platelets are devoid of GPIIb/IIIa. The same pattern of labeling was observed for both antigens as for normal platelets. Normal platelets were further observed after stimulation by agonists that either fail to induce (ADP) or induce granule secretion (thrombin). After treatment with ADP, platelets changed shape and centralized their granules; the plasma membrane immunolabeling remained unchanged; and gold particles were still found decorating the periphery of the centralized alpha- granules. After thrombin treatment, alpha-granules fused with the platelet membrane and secretion occurred. A significant increase of labeling was then observed on the platelet surface. From these results we conclude that the alpha-granule membrane contains two additional receptors in common with the plasma membrane. This suggests that alpha- granule membrane receptors may originate from a dual mechanism: direct targeting from the Golgi complex in megakaryocytes (for alpha-granule- specific receptors such as P-selectin) or by endocytosis from the plasma membrane (for proteins distributed in the two compartments).     

Selecting the best and brightest: A comparison of residency match processes in the United States and Canada

BACKGROUND:

Selecting candidates for plastic surgery residency training remains a challenge. In the United States, academic measures (United States Medical Licensing Exam Step I scores, medical school class rank and publications) are used as primary criteria for candidate selection for residency. In contrast, Canadian medical education de-emphasizes academic measures by using a pass-fail grading system. As a result, choosing residents from many qualified applicants may pose a challenge for Canadian programs without objective measures of academic success.

METHODS:

A 25-question online survey was distributed to program directors of Canadian plastic surgery residency-training programs. Program directors commented on number of yearly residents and applicants; application sections (ranked in importance using a Likert scale); interview invitation and rank-order list determination; and their satisfaction with the selection process.

RESULTS:

Ten Canadian plastic surgery program directors responded (90.9% response rate). The most important application components determining invitation to interview were letters of reference from a plastic surgeon (mean importance of 5.0 on the Likert scale), clinical electives in plastic surgery (mean 4.6) and electives with their program (mean 4.5). Applicants invited for interview were assessed on the quality of their responses to questions, maturity and personality. The majority of program directors agreed that a clinical elective with their program was important for consideration on their rank-order list. Program directors were neutral on their satisfaction with the selection process.

CONCLUSION:

Canadian plastic surgery residency programs emphasize clinical electives with their program and letters of reference from colleagues when selecting applicants for interviews. In contrast to their American counterparts, Canadian program directors rely on clinical interactions with prospective residents in the absence of objective academic measures.