Latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling of free-text responses exploring the negative impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on research in nursing

Aim

To derive latent topics from free-text responses on the negative impact of the pandemic on research activities and determine similarities and differences in the resulting themes between academic-based and clinical-based researchers.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of free-text responses from a cross-sectional online survey conducted by the Japan Academy of Nursing Science of its members in early 2020. The participants were categorized into two groups by workplace (academic-based and clinical-based researchers). Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling was used to extract latent topics statistically and list important keywords/text associated with the topics. After organizing similar topics by principal component analysis (PCA), we finally derived topic-associated themes by reading the keywords/texts and determining the similarity and differences of the themes between the two groups.

Results

A total of 201 respondents (163 academic-based and 38 clinical-based researchers) provided free-text responses. LDA identified eight and three latent topics for the academic-based and clinical-based researchers, respectively. While PCA re-grouped the eight topics derived from the former group into four themes, no merging of the topics from the latter group was performed resulting in three themes. The only theme common to the two groups was “barriers to conducting research,” with the remaining themes differing between the groups.

Conclusions

Using LDA topic modeling with PCA, we identified similarities and differences in the themes described in free-text responses about the negative impact of the pandemic between academic-based and clinical-based researchers. Measures to mitigate the negative impact of pandemics on nursing research may need to be tailored separately.     

Retroperitoneal hibernoma resected via laparoscopic surgery

Hibernomas are extremely rare, benign tumors of brown fat origin with no specific symptoms. Surgery is the only treatment option, and because a definitive preoperative diagnosis is often not obtained, open surgery is usually chosen. In this case, we performed laparoscopic surgery on a 33-year-old woman with retroperitoneal hibernoma. As in most cases, a definitive diagnosis had not been preoperatively made; therefore, we laparoscopically removed the retroperitoneal tumor of unknown pathology as a diagnostic treatment. We chose laparoscopic surgery because of the magnifying effect of the laparoscope and to minimize scarring. The surgery was uneventful, with a procedure time of 280 minutes and a blood loss of 20 mL. The postoperative course was uneventful with no complications or recurrence. We conclude that laparoscopic surgery may be a viable option for hibernomas.     

The first case of laparoscopic surgery for cecal cancer occurring in a blind loop

Cancer occurrence in a blind loop is extremely rare. An 86-year-old Japanese woman underwent colonoscopy for tarry stools and weight loss; it revealed a bypass of the transverse colon and small intestine, cecal cancer, and a polyp. She had suffered from acute appendicitis and had undergone two surgeries at age 25: an appendectomy and then a bypass surgery between the transverse colon and the small intestine. We performed a laparoscopy-assisted ileocecal resection for the cancer and polyp in the blind loop with an end-to-side instrumental anastomosis. The pathological examination demonstrated that the cancer was medullary carcinoma (T2, N0, M0, Stage I) and the polyp was tubular adenoma. Two months have passed since the patient's discharge, and she is free of abdominal complaints. Our literature search identified 10 cases of cancer in a blind loop. Laparoscopy-assisted surgery may be possible in patients who have undergone blind-loop surgery.