Risk Factors for Infection after 46,113 Intramedullary Nail Operations in Low- and Middle-income Countries

Background

The fields of surgery and trauma care have largely been neglected in the global health discussion. As a result the idea that surgery is not safe or cost effective in resource-limited settings has gone unchallenged. The SIGN Online Surgical Database (SOSD) is now one of the largest databases on trauma surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We wished to examine infection rates and risk factors for infection after IM nail operations in LMIC using this data.

Methods

The SOSD contained 46,722 IM nail surgeries in 58 different LMIC; 46,113 IM nail operations were included for analysis.

Results

The overall follow-up rate was 23.1 %. The overall infection rate was 1.0 %, 0.7 % for humerus, 0.8 % for femur, and 1.5 % for tibia fractures. If only nails with registered follow-up (n = 10,684) were included in analyses, infection rates were 2.9 % for humerus, 3.2 % for femur, and 6.9 % for tibia fractures. Prophylactic antibiotics reduced the risk of infection by 29 %. Operations for non-union had a doubled risk of infection. Risk of infection was reduced with increasing income level of the country.

Conclusions

The overall infection rates were low, and well within acceptable levels, suggesting that it is safe to do IM nailing in low-income countries. The fact that operations for non-union have twice the risk of infection compared to primary fracture surgery further supports the use of IM nailing as the primary treatment for femur fractures in LMIC.     

Sex differences in plaque morphology may explain the higher male prevalence of myocardial infarction compared to angina pectoris. The Tromsø Study

Objectives To study whether the degree of carotid atherosclerosis and the male predominance of echolucent plaques could explain the sex difference in myocardial infarction (MI) compared to angina pectoris (AP).

Design Ultrasound examination of the carotid artery was performed in 6727 persons. The presence of plaque, plaque thickness and number of segments with plaque were recorded. Plaque morphology in terms of echogenicity was scored as echolucent (soft plaque) or echogenic (hard plaque). A questionnaire was used to obtain information about coronary heart disease.

Results In men with the most advanced atherosclerosis, the risk (OR, 95% CI) of having MI compared to those with no carotid atherosclerosis was less than half as the corresponding risk in women (2.2, 1.4–3.3 vs 5.3, 2.6–10.6). For MI, the male-to-female ratio was highest in the group with no carotid plaque and declined by increasing burden of atherosclerosis. For AP, the sex ratio was independent of the degree of atherosclerosis.

Conclusions The findings support the hypothesis that the sex difference in MI compared to AP is due to the higher male prevalence of echolucent plaque.     

Mitral annulus motion compared with wall motion scoring index in the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction.

The biplane disc summation method is the recommended echocardiographic procedure to determine left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). Assessment of mitral annulus motion (MAM) or wall motion scoring index (WMI) has been reported to be less dependent on image quality compared with the recommended method, and proposed as a surrogate to the disc summation method in calculation of LVEF. We aimed to compare MAM and WMI in the echocardiographic assessment of LVEF. In a randomly selected population-based sample of 75-year-old men and women in sinus rhythm (n = 409) MAM, as measured by M-mode, was compared with WMI, calculated as the mean value of wall motion scoring in 9 LV segments. LVEF, as measured by the biplane disc summation method was used as reference. The limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 1.96 SD) between LVEF and corresponding MAM values were -18 to +13 LVEF%, and between LVEF and corresponding WMI values were -12 to +13 LVEF%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for MAM and WMI to predict a LVEF < 50% were 0.892 and 0.998, respectively (95% confidence interval of the difference 0.062-0.149). The corresponding areas for MAM and WMI to predict a LVEF < 40% were 0.955 and 0.998, respectively (95% confidence interval of the difference 0.017-0.069). In conclusion, the ability of WMI to estimate LVEF was more favorable than MAM in this population-based sample of 75-year-old participants. The findings suggest that the WMI is preferable to MAM in estimating LVEF.     

Quantification and characterisation of IgG binding to mould spores by flow cytometry and scanning electron microscopy

The concentration of mould-specific IgG antibodies in serum may objectively indicate mould exposure and can help identifying exposed individuals. Although inhaled spores probably are the most important source of mould exposure, the commonly used methods for detecting mould-specific IgG antibodies are based on extracts from all mould components, with only low contribution from spores. We have developed a flow cytometric method using surface antigens on mould spores for quantifying mould-specific IgG antibodies in serum. Flow cytometric results were evaluated by comparison with ImmunoCap and ELISA measurements. The flow cytometric assay showed a broad linear dose-dependency and correlated moderately to strongly (r=0.41-0.97) with ImmunoCap and ELISA measurements. The IgG antibody binding was studied in detail by immunolabelling in scanning electron microscopy (SEM), revealing that morphology and IgG antibody binding differed among spores, both within and between mould strains. Germination studies by flow cytometry and SEM showed that IgG antibody binding to mould spores was altered during germination due to loss of coat. The present spore based antibody assay are simple and suitable for quantification of mould-specific IgG antibodies in serum, and includes specificity to other and possibly more relevant antigens than existing methods.     

Exploring MEST: a new universal teaching strategy for school health services to promote positive mental health literacy and mental wellbeing among Norwegian adolescents

Background

Mental health among adolescents is an important public health challenge. School health services perform central public health functions in Norwegian municipalities, where school nurses are uniquely positioned to educate and promote mental health among adolescents. MEST (MEST is not an acronym; MEST is a short version of the Norwegian word for coping) is a newly developed universal working strategy for school health services that aims to promote positive mental health literacy (MHL) and mental wellbeing in the adolescent population. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential outcome mean differences in positive MHL and mental wellbeing between adolescents who participated and those who did not participate in MEST over a school year.

Methods

This study is based on cohort data collected from 357 adolescents (aged 15–21?years) in five Norwegian upper secondary schools at the beginning and end of the 2016/2017 school year. The data were analyzed by describing mean scores and estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) of MEST on positive MHL and mental wellbeing.

Results

Positive MHL increased significantly more among the MEST participants compared to the non-MEST participants (p?=?.02). No significant change in mental wellbeing was found between MEST and non-MEST participants (p?=?.98). Estimating the ATE of MEST on positive MHL, the MEST participants showed a significant 2.1% increase (p?=?.04) in the potential outcome mean of positive MHL compared to the nonparticipants. Estimating the ATE of MEST on mental wellbeing, the girls who attended MEST exhibited a significant 9.7% increase (p?=?.03) in the potential outcome mean of mental wellbeing compared with the girls who did not attend MEST, while no significant change (p?=?.99) was detected among boys or the entire sample of both genders combined (p?=?.12).

Conclusion

This study found a significant ATE of MEST on positive MHL and on mental wellbeing among girls. The results support further investments in studying MEST as a promising work strategy for school health services to promote adolescent mental health. This initial study of MEST may be used as a foundation for investing in future evaluations of MEST.

     

Predicting donor,recipient and graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation to inform pretransplant counselling: the donor and recipient linked iPREDICTLIVING tool – a retrospective study

Although separate prediction models for donors and recipients were previously published, we identified a need to predict outcomes of donor/recipient simultaneously, as they are clearly not independent of each other. We used characteristics from transplantations performed at the Oslo University Hospital from 1854 live donors and from 837 recipients of a live donor kidney transplant to derive Cox models for predicting donor mortality up to 20 years, and recipient death, and graft loss up to 10 years. The models were developed using the multivariable fractional polynomials algorithm optimizing Akaike’s information criterion, and optimism-corrected performance was assessed. Age, year of donation, smoking status, cholesterol and creatinine were selected to predict donor mortality (C-statistic of 0.81). Linear predictors for donor mortality served as summary of donor prognosis in recipient models. Age, sex, year of transplantation, dialysis vintage, primary renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease and HLA mismatch were selected to predict recipient mortality (C-statistic of 0.77). Age, dialysis vintage, linear predictor of donor mortality, HLA mismatch, peripheral vascular disease and heart disease were selected to predict graft loss (C-statistic of 0.66). Our prediction models inform decision-making at the time of transplant counselling and are implemented as online calculators.