Reduction of reticulata neuronal activity by zolpidem and alpidem, two imidazopyridines with high affinity for type I benzodiazepine receptors

Zolpidem and alpidem, two imidazopyridines with high affinity for the type I benzodiazepine recognition site, have recently been proposed as preferential hypnotic (zolpidem) and anxiolytic (alpidem) drugs notable for the minor incidence of side-effects. To further characterize the molecular mechanism involved in the action of these drugs, we studied their effects in comparison with those of diazepam on the spontaneous electrical activity of substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) neurons. These cells have been shown to be extremely sensitive to various positive and negative modulators of GABAergic transmission. All three drugs consistently produced a dose-dependent (0.03-8.0 mg/kg i.v.) inhibition of the firing of SNR cells when administered as a single bolus. However, zolpidem was more potent and efficacious than diazepam or alpidem. The ID50s were 0.076, 0.492 and 0.821 mg/kg, respectively. When the drugs were injected in exponentially (ratio 2) increasing doses up to 8.0 mg/kg, the rank order for tachyphylaxis was zolpidem much greater than diazepam greater than alpidem. Since the effects of the drugs were abolished and prevented by a small dose (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) of flumazenil (Ro 15-1788), it is likely that the effects were mediated through activation of benzodiazepine receptors. The results indicate that the hypnotic, zolpidem, has a more potent inhibitory action on SNR cell activity than the anxiolytics, alpidem and diazepam.     

Increased (L+)-lactic acid production in lysozyme-inactivated suspensions of human dental plaque

The effect of lysozyme-inactivation on L(+)-lactic acid (LA) production in dental plaque suspensions was evaluated. From 10 children 24-h plaque was collected and lysozyme activity inhibited by addition of goat antiserum to human lysozyme. Acid production was stimulated by addition of glucose. The results showed significantly increased LA levels (50-150%) in lysozyme-inactivated plaque suspensions from 8 of the subjects compared to untreated controls. The increase in acid production activity was not related to plaque lysozyme levels. The findings indicate that the presence of lysozyme may be limiting on acid production in the early dental plaque.     

Levodopa up-regulates platelet alpha 2-adrenoceptors

Treatment of dogs for 21 days with oral levodopa (100 mg b.i.d.) plus benserazide (25 mg b.i.d.) induced a significant increase in the number of platelet alpha 2-adrenoceptors labelled by [3H] yohimbine with no change in Kd. The rise was maximal at the end of the treatment and remained significant during the month following the cessation of treatment. Plasma catecholamine levels did not vary. Competition experiments showed a low affinity of both dopamine and levodopa for platelet alpha 2-adrenoceptors. These results suggest that levodopa treatment regulates alpha 2-adrenoceptor number in dog platelets.     

ACETALDEHYDE ADDUCTS WITH HAEMOGLOBIN: DETERMINATION OF ACETALDEHYDE RELEASED FROM HAEMOGLOBIN BY ACID HYDROLYSIS

Acetaldehyde, the first metabolite of ethanol, reacts with haemoglobinin vitro to produce acetaldehyde—haemoglobin adducts.Some clinical studies on the minor haemoglobins have suggestedthat these adducts may be formed in people abusing alcohol.Under hydrolysis of haemoglobin, with oxalic acid at 100°Cin sealed vials, some acetaldehyde was released and then specificallydetermined by HPLC. The kinetics of hydrolysis were studiedusing haemoglobin previously labelled with ¹⁴[C] acetaldehyde.The maximum liberation of ¹⁴[C] acetaldehyde was obtained after3 hr 30 min hydrolysis and this time factor was then utilizedin the analysis of alcoholic and control haemoglobin. Thus,we have confirmed the formation of acetaldehyde haemoglobinadducts in vivo. It must be noted that the released acetaldehydecorresponds only to an index of the stable adducts. The levelswere higher in alcoholics than in controls (1.417±0.171and 1.295±0.139 nmol/mg Hb, respectively, P<0.001).In conclusion, this marker is not a convenient tool for themonitoring of alcohol exposure levels because of the low differencesbetween alcoholic and control haemoglobins.