The Impact of Nurses on Neglected Tropical Disease Management

Although Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) are largely endemic in the developing nations of Africa, Asia, and South and Central America, they are reemerging with increasing frequency in developed countries. Their diagnosis, treatment, and control are an increasing public health concern that requires a different awareness by health care providers. Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are chronic infectious diseases which disproportionately burden poor, rural, and marginalized populations with significant mortality and high morbidity (disability, disfigurement, impaired childhood growth and cognitive development, increased vulnerability to coinfection) that reinforces their poverty. What can we learn from the nurses in developing countries already battling NTD's that could be useful in the developed world? This article provides an overview of distribution, pathophysiology, symptoms, and management of 13 NTDs, with particular attention to the role of nurses in delivering cost‐effective integrated interventions. Case studies of schistosomiasis, Chagas disease, and leishmaniasis address recognition and treatment of infected individuals in developed nations where NTD infection is limited primarily to immigrants and travelers.     

U.S. Public Health Service Response to the 2014–2015 Ebola Epidemic in West Africa: A Nursing Perspective

The 2014–2015 Ebola epidemic in West Africa has been the deadliest Ebola epidemic to date. In response to this deadly epidemic, the U.S. government declared this a top national security priority and members of the Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service were tasked to provide direct patient care to Ebola virus disease patients. Commissioned Corps nurses provided the highest level of care under the most austere conditions. This article discusses the training, ethical dilemmas, and constant risk for potential exposure while working in an Ebola Treatment Unit.     

Latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA): An often misdiagnosed type of diabetes mellitus

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to raise awareness about a frequently misdiagnosed form of diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA), to describe its clinical and epidemiological characteristics, and to compare them to those of the more common and widely known types of diabetes, type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) and type 2 DM.
Data sources: A review of the pertinent literature describing the features of LADA from 2000–2007 is summarized.
Conclusions: LADA is a rather common and often underrecognized form of diabetes whose clinical presentation falls somewhere between that of type 1 DM and type 2 DM. From a pathophysiological perspective, it is more closely related to type 1 DM, and some have even used the term type 1.5 diabetes to refer to it; however, it is most often misdiagnosed and treated as type 2 DM.
Implications for practice: Nurse practitioners (NPs) should always consider alternate diagnoses when patients with newly or previously identified adult-onset diabetes mellitus do not fit the traditional stereotype of type 2 DM (i.e., overweight with signs of insulin resistance and a significant family history of diabetes). Statistically, strong consideration must be given to the diagnosis of LADA, especially in those who are of normal weight, show little evidence of insulin resistance, and have hardly any family history of diabetes. Knowing the patient's exact diabetes type can give the NP a much greater understanding of the natural history of the patient's disease, the changes that may occur as the patient ages, and how to optimally manage their diabetes to minimize complications. Likewise, when a patient is correctly diagnosed, they can be empowered to manage their diabetes with the appropriate therapies.     

Careful counsel: Management of unintended pregnancy

Purpose: To provide a guideline for the care of women with unintended pregnancies, highlight the magnitude of unintended pregnancy, identify the demographic population at highest risk, offer assessment and diagnostic information, and describe the importance and practice of comprehensive, nondirective pregnancy options counseling, including information on abortion, adoption, and parenthood.
Data sources: Extensive literature review of government publications, professional clinical, nursing, and medical journals and textbooks.
Conclusions: The practice of counseling women and couples in a nondirective manner and providing comprehensive overview of options is paramount and should be the standard practice for all clinicians, especially within organizations funded by Title X funds.
Implications for practice: As we strive toward diligent patient advocacy, it is essential that NPs implement and endorse the ethical provision of options counseling through promoting values clarification and continuing education.     

Barriers to Referral for Elevated Blood Pressure in the Emergency Department and Differences Between Provider Type

A multidisciplinary sample of emergency department providers across the United States (n=450) were surveyed to identify barriers to referral for elevated blood pressure (BP) in the emergency department and differences between provider type. Registered nurses reported less knowledge of stage I hypertension (P=.043) and prehypertension (P<.01); were less aware of definitions for hypertension (P<.001); reported more difficulty in caring for patients who are asymptomatic (P=.007); required financial compensation to refer (P=.048); and perceived that BP referrals are influenced by the medical director (P<.001). Medical doctors reported more skills to refer (P=.008) and time as a barrier (P=.038). Physician assistants were more likely to report patients are not aware of health benefits (P=.035), doubted their concern for their BP (P=.023), and felt emotionally uncomfortable when referring (P=.025). Despite these differences, there was no significant difference between provider type and referral rates.