Iron overload in thalassaemia intermedia: reassessment of iron chelation strategies

Thalassaemia intermedia (TI) is a syndrome marked by its diverse underlying genetic basis although its pathophysiology remains unclear, particularly regarding the nature of iron loading and toxicity. It is, however, evident that there are key differences from the extensively studied thalassaemia major (TM) population and caution is required when assessing iron load based on serum ferritin values, as this approach is known to underestimate the true extent of iron loading in patients with TI. Although effective iron chelation therapy has been available for many years, studies in TI-specific populations are rare and evidence suggests that management of iron levels may be less rigorous than in patients with TM and other chronic anaemias. Better understanding of the need to assess and treat iron overload in both transfused and non-transfused TI patients is clearly required.     

Association of α‐actinin–binding anti–double‐stranded DNA antibodies with lupus nephritis

Objective

Anti–double‐stranded DNA (anti‐dsDNA) antibodies may contribute to the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis (GN) by cross‐reacting with α‐actinin in murine models and in some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We therefore sought to determine possible disease associations with serologic and clinical features and to characterize this new autoantibody specificity.

Methods

One hundred patients with SLE were recruited into this multicenter study, as well as 100 rheumatic disease controls and 2,100 healthy blood donors. Clinical disease was evaluated by the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI; excluding the anti‐DNA component). Anti‐dsDNA antibodies were detected by conventional enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Anti–α‐actinin antibodies were detected by ELISA, and their specificity was confirmed by Western blotting and by indirect immunofluorescence using rat kidney sections and mesangial cells as substrates. Highly positive sera were selected for absorption experiments and were affinity‐purified for cross‐reactivity studies and measurement of antibody avidity.

Results

Sera from 62 of the SLE patients had anti‐dsDNA antibodies; 21 of these sera also had anti–α‐actinin antibodies, as compared with 1 of the 38 sera without anti‐dsDNA antibodies. Of the 22 patients with anti–α‐actinin antibodies, 10 had GN, as compared with 14 of the 78 without anti–α‐actinin antibodies (P < 0.01). In patients with GN, anti–α‐actinin, but not anti‐dsDNA, antibodies correlated with the SLEDAI score (minus the anti‐DNA component) and with treatment. The fraction of serum anti‐dsDNA antibodies that cross‐reacted with α‐actinin exhibited high avidity for dsDNA, as determined using a commercial EIA for high‐avidity anti‐dsDNA antibodies and an in‐house conventional ELISA.

Conclusion

The α‐actinin–binding antibodies are significantly associated with GN in SLE. Whether such autoantibodies may anticipate the development of this complication of SLE remains to be verified.