IP-10 and type 1 diabetes: a question of time and location

Chemokines are key signal molecules that attract cells of the host immune system to the site of a potential threat. Virus infections usually induce a massive chemokine and cytokine burst and therefore recruit a large plethora of leukocytes to the site of infection with the goal to restrict and abrogate viral spread. The down side of this massive excitation of the human defense system is non-specific activation of potentially self-reactive lymphocytes. Coupled with an antigen-specific event, for example molecular mimicry between host components and viral proteins, autoimmunity might be the consequence in susceptible individuals. However, activated immune components with autoaggressive potential must find their target and must remain in one site sufficiently long in order to cause chronic tissue damage. In this review we will focus on the influence of the chemokine IP-10 (CXCL10) on the trafficking of autoaggressive cells during the immunopathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and explain why IP-10 can have a dual effect on T1D depending on time and location of expression.     

Extrinsic versus intrinsic cues in avian paraxial mesoderm patterning and differentiation.

Somitic and head mesoderm contribute to cartilage and bone and deliver the entire skeletal musculature. Studies on avian somite patterning and cell differentiation led to the view that these processes depend solely on cues from surrounding tissues. However, evidence is accumulating that some developmental decisions depend on information within the somitic tissue itself. Moreover, recent studies established that head and somitic mesoderm, though delivering the same tissue types, are set up to follow their own, distinct developmental programmes. With a particular focus on the chicken embryo, we review the current understanding of how extrinsic signalling, operating in a framework of intrinsically regulated constraints, controls paraxial mesoderm patterning and cell differentiation.     

Human Toll-like receptor-dependent induction of interferons in protective immunity to viruses

Summary: Five of the 10 human Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9), and four of the 12 mouse TLRs (TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, TLR9) can trigger interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-β, and IFN-λ, which are critical for antiviral immunity. Moreover, TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 differ from TLR4 in two particularly important ways for antiviral immunity: they can be activated by nucleic acid agonists mimicking compounds produced during the viral cycle, and they are typically present within the cell, along the endocytic pathway, where they sense viral products in the intraluminal space. Investigations in mice have demonstrated that the TLR7/9–IFN and TLR3–IFN pathways are different and critical for protective immunity to various experimental viral infections. Investigations in humans with interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-4 (IRAK-4) deficiency (unresponsive to TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9), UNC-93B deficiency (unresponsive to TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9), and TLR3 deficiency have recently shed light on the role of these two pathways in antiviral immunity in natural conditions. UNC-93B- and TLR3-deficient patients appear to be specifically prone to herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) encephalitis, although clinical penetrance is incomplete, whereas IRAK-4-deficient patients appear to be normally resistant to most viruses, including HSV-1. These experiments of nature suggest that the TLR7-, TLR8-, and TLR9-dependent induction of IFN-α, IFN-β, and IFN-λ is largely redundant in human antiviral immunity, whereas the TLR3-dependent induction of IFN-α, IFN-β, and IFN-λ is critical for primary immunity to HSV-1 in the central nervous system in children but redundant for immunity to most other viral infections.     

HLA-B27-restricted T cells from patients with ankylosing spondylitis recognize peptides from B*2705 that are similar to bacteria-derived peptides

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory systemic disease affecting the spine, sacroiliacal and peripheral joints. Although the aetiology of AS remains unknown, the strong association with the HLA-B27 allele might reflect directly a detrimental effect of the HLA-B27 molecule itself, resulting from its potential capability to present 'arthritogenic' peptides to CD8+ T cells. Because some forms of SpA are triggered by enterobacterial infection, such arthritogenic peptides might originate from autologous and/or bacterial proteins triggering cross-reactive CD8+ T cell clones. Intriguingly, two peptides from the second extracellular domain of HLA-B*2705 share sequence homologies with several enterobacterial antigens, exhibit the HLA-B27-binding-motif, and are presented by HLA-B*2705 itself. The objective of this study was to examine the clonal T cell reactivity against these peptides in patients with AS. To this end, we screened peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of 26 patients with AS and 24 healthy donors for TNF-alpha-producing cells using ELISPOT assays. PBL and synovial fluid-derived lymphocytes (SFL) of peptide-responsive patients were then stimulated and cultured with the relevant peptide and control peptides in vitro. Antigen-specific T cell lines (TCL) were identified by standard chromium release assays. Clonal analysis was performed subsequently applying TCRB-CDR3 spectratyping. Among eight peptides tested, only the HLA-B27 168-176 peptide LRRYLENGK was recognized by PBL from B27+ AS patients but not from B27+ healthy controls (P=0.001). LRRYLENGK-specific T cell clones used preferentially the TCRBV5S1 and the BV14 segment. These results suggest that an HLA-B27-derived peptide with homology to bacterial peptides may play a role in AS.     

Behavioral phenotyping of mice in pharmacological and toxicological research

The evaluation of behavioral effects is an important component for the in vivo screening of drugs or potentially toxic compounds in mice. Ideally, such screening should be composed of monitoring general health, sensory functions, and motor abilities, right before specific behavioral domains are tested. A rational strategy in the design and procedure of testing as well as an effective composition of different well-established and reproducible behavioral tests can minimize the risk of false positive and false negative results in drug screening. In the present review we describe such basic considerations in planning experiments, selecting strains of mice, and propose groups of behavioral tasks suitable for a reliable detection of differences in specific behavioral domains in mice. Screening of general health and neurophysiologic functions (reflexes, sensory abilities) and motor function (pole test, wire hang test, beam walking, rotarod, accelerod, and footprint) as well as specific hypothesis-guided testing in the behavioral domains of learning and memory (water maze, radial maze, conditioned fear, and avoidance tasks), emotionality (open field, hole board, elevated plus maze, and object exploration), nociception (tail flick, hot plate), psychiatric-like conditions (porsolt swim test, acoustic startle response, and prepulse inhibition), and aggression (isolation-induced aggression, spontaneous aggression, and territorial aggression) are described in further detail. This review is designed to describe a general approach, which increases reliability of behavioral screening. Furthermore, it provides an overview on a selection of specific procedures suitable for but not limited to behavioral screening in pharmacology and toxicology.     

Parvovirus B19 infection and autoimmune disease

Human parvovirus B19 infections may cause a widespread benign and self-limiting disease in children and adults, known as erythema infectiosum or fifth disease. A variety of further manifestations are associated with the infection such as arthralgias, arthritis, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, anemia and vasculitis, spontaneous abortion and hydrops fetalis in pregnant women. Both in children and adults parvovirus B19 infections have been frequently implicated as a cause or trigger of various forms of autoimmune diseases affecting joints, connective tissue and large and small vessels. In addition, autoimmune neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia are known as sequelae of B19 infection. The molecular basis of the autoimmune phenomena and resultant pathogenesis is unclear. The involvement of molecular mimicry between cellular and viral proteins, the induction of enhanced cytokine production via the viral transactivator protein NS1 and the phospholipase A2-like activity of the capsid protein VP1 may contribute to the induction of autoimmune reactions. All the known data and the potential mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis will be discussed in this review.     

Visualizing the course of antigen-specific CD8 and CD4 T cell responses to a growing tumor

Spontaneous tumors frequently express antigens that can be recognized by the immune system but nevertheless manage to evade immune surveillance. To better understand the mechanism of evasion, we followed CD8 and CD4 T cells reacting against a subcutaneously growing tumor, modified to express influenza hemagglutinin (HA) as surrogate tumor antigen. Adoptive transfer of 8,000 antigen-specific CD8 T cells was sufficient to protect against challenge with 1x10(6) tumor cells, while larger numbers of T cells rejected established tumors. HA-specific CD4 T cells could not reject tumors on their own but helped rejection by CD8 T cells. Rejection of the tumor coincided with prolonged survival of expanded antigen-specific CD8 and CD4 T cells, while a failing anti-tumor response was accompanied by transient expansion followed by rapid elimination of antigen-specific T cells. Thus, a highly immunogenic tumor can evade immune surveillance because of an insufficient number of tumor-specific T cells and antigen overload, resulting in exhaustion of the immune response. In this scenario, adoptive immunotherapy rather than vaccination promises successful treatment.