肝门部胆管癌的分型分期系统及其临床应用价值

肝门部胆管癌（hilar cholangiocarcinoma，HC）分型和分期系统较为庞杂，包括改良Bismuth-Corlette分型，Gazzaniga T分期，Blumgart T分期，美国纪念Sloan-Kattering癌症中心（Memorial Sloan Katering Cancer Center，MSKCC）T分期，Mayo分期系统，美国癌症联合委员会（American Joint Committee on Cancer，AJCC）和国际抗癌联盟（International Union Against Cancer，UICC）联合发布的TNM分期，欧洲肝胆胰协会分期（Consensus classification from the European Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association，EHPBA），以及日本肝胆胰外科学会（Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery，JSHBPS）分期，各分期系统所包含的内容差异较大，各具特色和优缺点，本文就HC常见的分型和分期系统及其在临床中的应用价值做一综述。     

Anti-goat antibodies as a rare cause of high gonadotropin levels during menopausal transition

Abstract

Objective: To understand the origin of extremely high gonadotropin levels in a perimenopausal woman.

Methods: A 52-year-old woman with a 2?months of amenorrhea followed spontaneous menstrual cycles recovery was referred to our outpatient clinic with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH, 483 mUI/ml), luteinizing hormone (LH, 475 mUI/ml) and prolactin (PRL, 173?ng/ml). She was known to take levosulpiride. The gonadotropin levels did not fit with the clinical features.

Results: A gonadotroph tumor was ruled out. Further analysis confirmed constantly high FSH, LH and PRL levels. The measurements were repeated using different analytical platforms with different results. After serial dilutions, nonlinearity was present suggesting an immunoassay interference. After post-polyethylene glycol recovery, hormone levels appeared in the normal range. Anti-goat antibodies were recognized in the serum of the patient.

Conclusions: This case report shows a case of falsely abnormal high gonadotropin and PRL levels in a woman during menopause transition. In the clinical practice the evaluation of gonadotropin profile is not recommended at this age, but the abnormal levels stimulated further evaluation. An interference in the assay due to anti-goat antibodies resulted in abnormally high level of FSH and LH. A strict collaboration between clinicians and the laboratory is needed, when laboratory findings do not correspond to clinical findings.