Physician evaluation after medical errors: does having a computer decision aid help or hurt in hindsight?

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined whether physicians' use of computerized decision aids affects patient satisfaction and/or blame for medical outcomes. METHOD: Experiment 1: Fifty-nine undergraduates read about a doctor who made either a correct or incorrect diagnosis and either used a decision aid or did not. All rated the quality of the doctor's decision and the likelihood of recommending the doctor. Those receiving a negative outcome also rated negligence and likelihood of suing. Experiment 2: One hundred sixty-six medical students and 154 undergraduates read negative-outcome scenarios in which a doctor either agreed with the aid, heeded the aid against his own opinion, defied the aid in favor of his own opinion, or did not use a decision aid. Subjects rated doctor fault and competence and the appropriateness of using decision aids in medicine. Medical students made judgments for themselves and for a layperson. RESULTS: Experiment 1: Using a decision aid caused a positive outcome to be rated less positively and a negative outcome to be rated less negatively. Experiment 2: Agreeing with or heeding the aid was associated with reduced fault, whereas defying the aid was associated with roughly the same fault as not using one at all. Medical students were less harsh than undergraduates but accurately predicted undergraduate's responses. CONCLUSION: Agreeing with or heeding a decision aid, but not defying it, may reduce liability after an error. However, using an aid may reduce favorability after a positive outcome.     

A Thalamic Contribution to Arousal-induced, Non-photic Entrainment of the Circadian Clock of the Syrian Hamster

It is well established that the circadian clock of the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) is entrained by light. More recently, the potent effects of arousing, non-photic cues on the clock have been recognized. The neural mediators of non-photic entrainment are yet to be identified. To examine the contribution of the thalamic intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) and its NPY-immunopositive projection, the geniculo-hypothalamic tract to non-photic entrainment by arousal, male Syrian hamsters received lesions of the IGL (IGLX) which ablated NPY-immunoreactivity in the SCN. Their circadian responses to both photic and non-photic cues were then tested. Lesions resulted in a delay in the timing of activity onset following lights out, but had no effect on the behavioural or cellular circadian responses to phase-advancing light pulses presented at circadian time (CT) CT19 (where CT12 represents the time of activity onset). Injection with a benzodiazepine (chlordiazepoxide, 100 mg/kg) at CT6 suppressed wheel-running, increased general locomotion of intact controls and induced large phase advances of the circadian rhythm of wheel-running. Chlordiazepoxide also inhibited wheel-running in lesioned animals, but there was no significant increase in general locomotion and the lesioned animals did not phase advance. Serial arousal by injection of saline at intervals of 23.5 h for 6 days entrained the circadian rhythm of wheel-running of intact hamsters and was associated with an increase in general locomotor activity. Entrainment by serial arousal was abolished by IGLX. However, the lesioned animals did show a clear behavioural response to every presentation of the non-photic cue. These results show that the IGL is a necessary component of the neural pathways mediating both arousal- and benzodiazepine-induced non-photic entrainment.     

Satisfaction with Team Midwifery Care for Low‐ and High‐Risk Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT:Background: In 1996 a new model of maternity care characterized by continuity of midwifery care from early pregnancy through the postpartum period was implemented for women attending Monash Medical Centre, a tertiary level obstetric service, in Melbourne, Australia. This study's purpose was to assess the impact of this model on women's views and experiences of care during the antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum periods compared with views of women receiving standard maternity care. Methods: One thousand low‐ and high‐risk women who booked at the antenatal clinic and met the eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to continuity of midwifery care from a group of seven midwives in collaboration with medical staff, or to standard care from a variety of midwives and medical staff. Women's views of care were measured by means of a postal questionnaire at four months after the birth. Results: Team midwifery care was associated with increased satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and some aspects of postpartum care. The differences were most obvious for antenatal care. Conclusions: Continuity of midwifery care is realistically achievable in a tertiary obstetric referral service and is associated with increased satisfaction. (BIRTH 30:1 March 2003)     

Comparison of Two Formulations of Nifedipine During 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

Study Objective . To determine if one commercial extended-release formulation of nifedipine (Adalat CC) is as effective as another (Procardia XL) in controlling blood pressure over 24 hours. Design . Open-label, randomized, crossover study. Setting . University-affiliated family medicine clinic. Patients . Fifteen patients with stage 1–4 primary hypertension. Interventions . Procardia XL or Adalat CC once/day was titrated to achieve blood pressure control. The effective dose was continued for 4 weeks, washed out for 1 week, and reinstituted with other study drug. Measurements and Main Results . Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was recorded the conclusion of each treatment phase. Treatment phases were compared for mean 24-hour blood pressure, mean daytime (6:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m.) and mean nighttime blood pressure, and mean blood pressure load (percentage of blood pressure measurements < 140/90 mm Hg daytime and > 120/80 mm Hg nighttime). Thirteen patients completed the study. No statistically significant difference was seen in mean 24-hour blood pressure (138/86 mm Hg for Procardia XL vs 137/85 mm Hg for Adalat CC), daytime or nighttime blood pressure, or blood pressure load. Two patients experienced clinically significant adverse effects while taking Adalat CC. Conclusions . In these patients with primary hypertension, Adalat CC was as effective as Procardia XL at controlling blood pressure for 24 hours. Blood pressure, heart rate, and adverse effects should be monitored 2–4 weeks after any exchange of Adalat CC for Procardia XL.