Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective

OBJECTIVES: The conservative versus therapeutic approach to type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of the conservative approach of embolizing type II endoleak only when persistent for more than 6 months and associated with aneurysm sac growth of 5 mm or more. METHODS: Data for 486 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR were analyzed for incidence and outcome of type II endoleaks. Spiral computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed, and patient outcome was evaluated at either office visit or telephone contact. Patients with new or late-appearing type II endoleak were evaluated with spiral CT at 6-month intervals to evaluate both persistence of the endoleak and size of the aneurysm sac. Persistent (>or=6 months) type II endoleak and aneurysm sac growth of 5 mm or greater were treated with either translumbar glue or coil embolization of the lumbar source, or transarterial coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery. RESULTS: Type II endoleaks were detected in 90 (18.5%) patients. With a mean follow-up of 21.7 +/- 16 months, only 35 (7.2%) patients had type II endoleak that persisted for 6 months or longer. Aneurysm sac enlargement was noted in 5 patients, representing 1% of the total series. All 5 patients underwent successful translumbar sac embolization (n = 4) or transarterial inferior mesenteric artery embolization (n = 4) at a mean follow-up of 18.2 +/- 8.0 months, with no recurrence or aneurysm sac growth. No patient with treated or untreated type II endoleak has had rupture of the aneurysm. The mean global cost for treatment of persistent type II endoleak associated with aneurysm sac growth was US dollars 6695.50 (hospital cost plus physician reimbursement). Treatment in the 30 patients with persistent type II endoleak but no aneurysm sac growth would have represented an additional cost of US dollars 200000 or more. The presence or absence of a type II endoleak did not affect survival (78% vs 73%) at 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: Selective intervention to treat type II endoleak that persists for 6 months and is associated with aneurysm enlargement seems to be both safe and cost-effective. Longer follow-up will determine whether this conservative approach to management of type II endoleak is the standard of care.     

CDKN1A and CDKN1B polymorphisms and risk of advanced prostate carcinoma

A multigenic model of prostate cancer susceptibility has been proposed, in which common polymorphic variants of genes, such as the androgen and vitamin D receptor, contribute to tumorigenesis. The discovery of additional genetic factors that contribute to prostate cancer risk should provide opportunities for new approaches to the detection and treatment of this common malignancy. Herein, we examined single nucleotide polymorphic variants in the 3'-untranslated region of CDKN1A (p21(cip1)) and in codon 109 of CDKN1B (p27(kip1)) for association with advanced prostate cancer in a European-American population. Ninety-six cases and 106 controls were analyzed using PCR amplification and restriction digestion assays. CDKN1A genotype was scored as CC, CT, and TT on the basis of the digestion products. The CDKN1A genotypes CT and TT were associated with an increased risk of advanced prostate carcinoma compared with the CC genotype [odds ratio (OR), 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-4.95]. The CDKN1B genotype was scored as VV, VG, or GG, again on the basis of the digestion products. The CDKN1B genotype VV was also associated with an increased risk of advanced prostate carcinoma (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.09-3.47). These associations were particularly strong in those patients with androgen-independent disease [OR = 2.88 (95% CI, 1.19-6.97) and 2.11 (95% CI, 1.05-4.22) for high-risk genotypes of CDKN1A and CDKN1B, respectively]. In addition, the association of CDKN1B was particularly strong in the cohort of patients under the median age of diagnosis (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.08-4.59). These results suggest that in a European-American population, CDKN1A and CDKN1B variants are associated with advanced prostate cancer. Analysis of CDKN1A and/or CDKN1B genotypes may prove useful in determining which patients are at risk for developing advanced prostate carcinoma and therefore would gain the most from aggressive screening, prophylaxis, and/or treatment.     

Activity of multitargeted antifolate (pemetrexed disodium, LY231514) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: results from a phase II study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to confirm the activity and assess the safety profile of multitargeted antifolate (MTA) for patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Forty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 35 with colon and 11 with rectal carcinoma. Adjuvant therapy was allowed if completed 1 year previously. Patients received MTA 600 mg/m(2) as a 10-minute intravenous infusion once every 21 days. Blood samples were taken every cycle for pharmacokinetic and vitamin metabolite assays. RESULTS: Among 39 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, 1 complete response and 5 partial responses were identified, for an overall response rate of 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-26. 7%) for all patients. Fifteen patients had stable disease, with 9 living longer than 1 year. The median survival was 16.2 months (95% CI, 10.5-17.0%); 65% of patients were alive at 1 year, and the median time to progression was 4.4 months (range, 3.2-5.7 months). The main toxicities were hematologic, with common toxicity criteria (CTC) Grades 3 or 4 noted as follows: thrombocytopenia (18%), neutropenia (55%), and anemia (18%). Nonhematologic toxicities included Grade 2 or 3 skin reaction (53%), ameliorated by dexamethasone, and Grade 3 transaminases (23%). Dose omissions were not required and 21% of doses were reduced. CONCLUSIONS: MTA has clear activity in patients with colorectal carcinoma, and encouraging survival times were noted. MTA was well tolerated in this patient group, but myelosuppression was frequent. Toxicity may be increased with folate deficiency.     

Phase II study of fosaprepitant + 5HT3 receptor antagonist + dexamethasone in patients with germ cell tumors undergoing 5-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a Hoosier Cancer Research Network study

Purpose

A phase III study adding aprepitant to a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (5HT3-RA) plus dexamethasone in germ cell tumor (GCT) patients treated with 5-day cisplatin combination chemotherapy demonstrated a significant improvement in complete response (CR) (J Clin Onc 30:3998-4003, 2012). Fosaprepitant has demonstrated non-inferiority compared to aprepitant in single-day cisplatin chemotherapy and is approved as a single-dose alternative. This single-arm phase II study is the first clinical trial evaluating fosaprepitant in patients receiving multi-day cisplatin regimen.

Methods

GCT patients receiving a 5-day cisplatin combination chemotherapy were enrolled. Fosaprepitant 150 mg was given IV on days 3 and 5. A 5HT3-RA days 1–5 (days 1, 3, and 5, if palonosetron) plus dexamethasone 20 mg days 1 and 2 and 4 mg po bid days 6, 7, and 8 was administered. Rescue antiemetics were allowed. The primary objective was to determine the CR rate—no emetic episodes or use of rescue medications. Accrual of 64 patients was planned with expected CR?>?27 %.

Results

Sixty-five patients were enrolled of whom 54 were eligible for analysis. Median age was 33. Fifty-one patients received bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy. CR was observed in 13 (24.1 %) patients (95 % Agresti-Coull binomial C.I. 14.5 %, 37.1 %).

Conclusion

The data in this phase II study, in contrast to our prior phase III study, appears to indicate a lower CR rate with the substitution of fosaprepitant for aprepitant. It is unknown whether the substitution of fosaprepitant for aprepitant provides the same benefit in multi-day cisplatin that was achieved with single-day cisplatin. Trial registration Clinical trial information NCT01736917