Evidence of tendinitis provoked by fluoroquinolone treatment: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the use of fluoroquinolone agents and the risk of tendinitis in a large population-based case-control study. METHODS: The study was performed by linking automated health databases from the Region of Lombardia, Italy. Cases were patients aged > or =18 years who had a hospital discharge diagnosis of non-traumatic tendinitis in 2002-3. For each case, up to five controls were randomly selected among those eligible for inclusion in the study. A conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratio of tendinitis associated with the current, recent and past use of fluoroquinolones. Odds ratios were adjusted for exposure to other antibacterials and other drugs. RESULTS: 22,194 cases and 104,906 controls met the inclusion criteria. Current use of fluoroquinolones significantly increased the risk of tendon disorders as a whole (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7; 95% CI 1.4, 2.0), tendon rupture (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0, 1.8) and rupture of the Achilles' tendon (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.8, 9.6). Concomitant use of corticosteroids and fluoroquinolones increased the risk of both tendon rupture (OR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.5, 6.3) and rupture of the Achilles' tendon (OR = 43.2; 95% CI 5.5, 341.1). DISCUSSION: Evidence that exposure to fluoroquinolones is associated with the sudden occurrence of tendinitis is supported by this large population-based study. We can estimate that a single case of rupture of the Achilles' tendon would occur for every 5958 persons treated with fluoroquinolones (95% CI 2148, 23,085). The corresponding number needed to harm is 979 (95% CI 122, 9172) for patients who concomitantly use corticosteroids and 1638 (95% CI 351, 8843) for those aged >60 years. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of this adverse effect, and the increased risk for fluoroquinolone-associated tendinitis in elderly patients with corticosteroid use must be considered when these agents are prescribed.     

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes are reliable biomarkers for familial aggregation of coronary heart disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an atherogenic and prothrombotic molecule formed by the covalent binding of the highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] to apoprotein B-100 of LDL. High Lp(a) concentrations are a recognized genetic risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) and have been shown to be related with a familial clustering of ischemic cardiac events. Nevertheless, the association between apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and a positive familial history of CHD has received far less attention. In this report, we explored the distribution of apo(a) phenotypes in 127 CHD subjects with a family history of coronary events and in 92 CHD patients without such a history. Twenty-two apo(a) isoforms were detected by a high-resolution immunoblotting method. In univariate analysis, the percentage of subjects with at least one small sized apo(a) isoform was significantly higher in CHD patients with a positive family history than in those without (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that apo(a) isoforms of low molecular weight were the best predictors of familial aggregation of cardiac ischemia. We conclude that apo(a) size polymorphism is strongly associated with a familial history of CHD and is more efficient than Lp(a) plasma concentrations in predicting the familial clustering of coronary disease. When detected by high-resolution techniques, apo(a) phenotypes are objective laboratory markers that can substitute for a knowledge of a positive family history of CHD and should be used, together with Lp(a) levels, to better assess the familial predisposition to coronary events.     

Genomic allelotyping for distinction of recurrent and de novo hepatocellular carcinoma after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Distinction between recurrent and de novo hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) bears important clinical and therapeutic implications. Techniques for molecular profiling of clinically suspected de novo and recurrent HCC are required since the histological/clinical discrimination of donor vs. recipient tumor origin is difficult. Multiple PCR amplification of 16 highly polymorphic short tandem repeat (STR) DNA sequences (routinely used for paternity and forensic assays) was applied in two patients who developed a second HCC after OLT. In both patients the technique provided reliable evidence that the two second HCC were recurrences of the primary tumor. Multiple STR genetic allelotyping is an effective tool for clear-cut discrimination of donor/recipient origin of a second HCC after OLT. Its application could be of great therapeutic relevance for such OLT patients.     

Stereotactic Radiotherapy after Incomplete Transarterial (Chemo-) Embolization (TAE\TACE) versus Exclusive TAE or TACE for Treatment of Inoperable HCC: A Phase III Trial (NCT02323360)

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent liver malignancy and a leading cause of cancer death in the world. In unresectable HCC patients, transcatheter arterial (chemo-) embolization (TAE/TACE) has shown a disease response in 15–55% of cases. Though multiple TAE/TACE courses can be administered in principle, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as an alternative option in the case of local relapse following multiple TAE/TACE courses. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group superiority trial of SBRT versus standard TAE/TACE for the curative treatment of the intermediate stage of HCC after an incomplete response following TAE/TACE ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02323360","term_id":"NCT02323360"}}NCT02323360). The primary endpoint is 1-year local control (LC): 18 events were needed to assess a 45% difference (HR: 0.18) in favor of SBRT. The secondary endpoints are 1-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Distant Recurrence-Free Survival (DRFS), Overall Survival (OS) and the incidence of acute and late complications. Results: At the time of the final analysis, 40 patients were enrolled, 19 (49%) in the TAE/TACE arm and 21 (51%) in the SBRT arm. The trial was prematurely closed due to slow accrual. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 57% and 36%. The use of SBRT resulted in superior LC as compared to TAE/TACE rechallenge (median not reached versus 8 months, p = 0.0002). PFS was 29% and 16% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. OS was 86% and 62% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. In the TAE arm, PFS was 13% and 6% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. In the SBRT arm, at 1 and 2 years, PFS was 37% and 21%, respectively. OS at 1 and 2 years was 75% and 64% in the SBRT arm and 95% and 57% in the TACE arm, respectively. No grade >3 toxicity was recorded. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective treatment option in patients affected by inoperable HCC experiencing an incomplete response following ≥1 cycle of TAE/TAC.     

Antiendomysial and antihuman recombinant tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-proven European multicentre study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of serum antitissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies (IgA-TTG) and IgA antiendomysial antibodies (IgA-EMA) in the diagnosis of coeliac disease in cohorts from different geographical areas in Europe. The setting allowed a further comparison between the antibody results and the conventional small-intestinal histology. METHODS: A total of 144 cases with coeliac disease [median age 19.5 years (range 0.9-81.4)], and 127 disease controls [median age 29.2 years (range 0.5-79.0)], were recruited, on the basis of biopsy, from 13 centres in nine countries. All biopsy specimens were re-evaluated and classified blindly a second time by two investigators. IgA-TTG were determined by ELISA with human recombinant antigen and IgA-EMA by an immunofluorescence test with human umbilical cord as antigen. RESULTS: The quality of the biopsy specimens was not acceptable in 29 (10.7%) of 271 cases and a reliable judgement could not be made, mainly due to poor orientation of the samples. The primary clinical diagnosis and the second classification of the biopsy specimens were divergent in nine cases, and one patient was initially enrolled in the wrong group. Thus, 126 coeliac patients and 106 controls, verified by biopsy, remained for final analysis. The sensitivity of IgA-TTG was 94% and IgA-EMA 89%, the specificity was 99% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IgA-TTG measurement is effective and at least as good as IgA-EMA in the identification of coeliac disease. Due to a high percentage of poor histological specimens, the diagnosis of coeliac disease should not depend only on biopsy, but in addition the clinical picture and serology should be considered.