高效液相色谱法测定右旋儿茶素血浆浓度及药代动力学参数

本文建立了体液中右旋儿茶素的RP-HPLC测定方法。采用C_(18)键合相硅胶为填料的固相提取柱进行样品预处理,右旋儿茶素的提取回收率为79.8%.应用二极管阵列检测器对色谱峰纯度进行鉴定。该法精密度好,方法回收率近100%,日内、日间的变异系数为2.4～5.6%,血浓69.6～1160 ng/ml范围内呈线性关系,r=0.9993。家兔静注右旋儿茶素18mg/kg,其药代动力学过程符合二室模型,分布相半衰期为0.129 h,消除相半衰期为1.19h。     

AZATHIOPRINE INDUCED BONE MARROW SUPPRESSION IN LIVE RELATED RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS

Over a follow-up period of 6 years, 4 out of 31 live related renal allograft recipients (12.9%) developed azathioprine induced bone marrow suppression. Presentation in 3 patients was with fever and 2 patients also had associated graft dysfunction. All patients had leucopenia, 2 patients in addition had anaemia and one patient had pancytopenia. Bone marrow suppression developed 9.6 months (3.5-16.0 months) following transplantation and recovery followed over a period of 30 (18-49 days) days after withdrawal of the drug. One patient succumbed during the phase of bicytopenia.KEY WORDS: Azathioprine, Bone marrow suppression, Kidney transplantation     

Bone marrow transplantation for constitutional pure red cell aplasia

Constitutional pure red cell aplasia (CPRCA) is a syndrome of failed erythropoiesis usually diagnosed within the first year of life. Four patients with CPRCA received transplants with marrow from their HLA- identical, mixed lymphocyte culture-nonreactive siblings. All patients were resistant to corticosteroid therapy and were dependent on regular red cell transfusions for at least 5 years. Three patients were conditioned with procarbazine, antithymocyte globulin, cyclophosphamide, and busulfan, and one was conditioned with antithymocyte serum, cyclophosphamide, and busulfan. Three patients promptly had successful engraftments with establishment of donor hematopoiesis. One patient initially rejected his graft but received a successful retransplant. All patients are currently alive with Karnofsky performance scores of 100 and normal erythropoiesis of donor origin. Despite a history of multiple transfusions, bone marrow transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for patients with CPRCA.     

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the ‘HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm’. Step 1 (P=Pre‐test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for heart failure symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non‐cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e′), LV filling pressure estimated using E/e′, left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2–4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F₁: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F₂: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.