Comparison of ThinPrep versus conventional smear cytopreparatory techniques for fine-needle aspiration specimens of head and neck masses.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic accuracy of the ThinPrep process (Cytyc, Boxborough, MA) was compared with that of conventional (smear) cytopreparation for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of head and neck masses. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, 209 patients served as their own controls and underwent 236 FNAs using ThinPrep and conventional (smear) cytopreparatory techniques. RESULTS: ThinPrep produced less air-drying artifact and less mechanical distortion than the conventional method. The conventional technique was diagnostic in 63% of samples; the ThinPrep technique was diagnostic in 55% of samples. When all results were combined, pathologists subjectively preferred the conventional technique but accepted use of ThinPrep as the only cytopreparatory technique for most head and neck masses. CONCLUSIONS: For adequately experienced cytopathologists, ThinPrep is acceptable for FNA of salivary masses, neck cysts, metastatic lymph nodes, and thyroid lesions. Conventional smear technique should be used for FNA of nonmetastatic lymphoid lesions. Use of ThinPrep can complement use of the conventional (smear) cytopreparatory technique when aspirate is nondiagnostic or bloody, when the patient has a blood-borne infectious disease, when the clinician is inexperienced, or when aspirate has entered the syringe.     

Plasma concentrations of mianserin after single dose and at steady-state in depressed elderly patients

Plasma mianserin and desmethylmianserin concentrations were measured in 17 clinically depressed elderly patients after a single 30 mg dose of mianserin. The patients then received mianserin 30 mg daily for up to 6 weeks and the plasma concentrations were measured at weekly intervals. The relationship between concentrations of mianserin and desmethylmianserin at steady-state and at 16 and 24 hours after the single test dose was not good enough to be used for prediction of dosage requirements. Reasons for this finding are discussed.     

Photometrics: a new method of measuring the cross-sectional area of the subglottis.

A new endoscopic method of measuring the cross-sectional area of a subglottic stenosis is presented. The method was tested against existing techniques using a model. By standardizing the distance from the objective of the endoscope to the stenotic area we were able to measure the cross-sectional area using a graduated grid held against the video screen. This technique was then compared with the standard one of estimating the diameter of a stenosis from the external diameter of the bronchoscope which can be passed through the stenosis. The methods were found to be equally accurate in measuring the lumen diameter. However, when measuring the minimum cross-sectional area, three of five observers were significantly better (P less than 0.01) using the photometric method rather than the standard method (Wilcoxon's rank sum test for paired data). The photometric technique of measuring the cross-sectional area of the subglottis is easily performed, non-traumatic, and allows a visual record to be kept.