Hood versus mask nebulization in infants with evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To compare infants' discomfort, nursing-time and caregiver preference, and assess the clinical efficiency (as a secondary outcome) of hood versus facemask nebulization in infants with evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in the neonatal intensive care unit. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, open, randomized, controlled crossover clinical trial. In total, 10 infants with BPD who were on inhaled beta-agonist bronchodilators and corticosteroids were randomly assigned to receive their nebulized treatments either by a facemask, or by a hood for 2-3 days, and then crossover to receive the same treatments with the other technique for another 2-3 days. Infants' discomfort, nursing-time, caregiver preference and clinical efficiency were compared. RESULTS: At baseline there was no significant clinical difference between the groups. Nurse-time required for administering the hood nebulization (mean+/-s.e.m.: 1.9+/-0.1 min) was significantly shorter than the time for mask nebulization (12.0+/-0.6 min, P<0.0001). Infants' discomfort score was significantly lower (0.1+/-0.04) for hood versus mask nebulization (2.5+/-0.2, P<0.0001). Nurses and parents unequivocally preferred the hood treatment. During both mask and hood nebulization therapies (2-3 days) clinical efficiency was comparable. While both methods caused an immediate (20 min post) clinical improvement, the immediate respiratory assessment change score was significantly greater for the hood versus the mask nebulization (0.62+/-0.27 versus 0.13+/-0.14, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nebulization of aerosolized medications in infants with evolving BPD by hood was less time-consuming for caregivers and was much better tolerated by the infants while being at least as effective as the conventional facemask nebulization.     

HIV transmission by needle stick and eczematous lesion — Three cases from Germany

Summary Two cases of documented HIV-1 transmission by needle stick and one case of probable transmission by eczematous lesion in three nurses in Germany are reported in the period 1988 to 1991. In two of the cases the nurse knew of the AIDS status of the index patient. A review of the three cases reiterates the importance of repeated training on the prevention of accident and on measures to be taken after an accident, as well as the need to keep the workplace free of additional burden when AIDS or HIV-infected patients are treated.

---

HIV-Übertragung durch Nadelstichverletzung und über offenes Ekzem. Drei Fälle aus Deutschland

Zusammenfassung Zwei dokumentierte HIV-Übertragungen über Nadelstichverletzung und eine Übertragung über ein offenes Hautekzem der Hand bei zwei Krankenschwestern und einem Pfleger aus den Jahren 1988 bis 1991 werden geschildert. Diese Übersicht der drei Fälle weist auf die Bedeutung von wiederholten Übungen hin, um einen Unfall zu verhüten und auf Maßnahmen die nach einem Unfall zu ergreifen sind. Unter anderem auf die Notwendigkeit den Arbeitsplatz von zusätzlichen Gegenständen freizuhalten, wenn AIDS- oder HIV-infizierte Patienten behandelt werden.

     

Urban/Rural Differences in Prosthetic Dental Service Rates

There have been few reports of relative rates of provision of dental health services in rural and urban settings, a comparative measure of access to care in these populations. One part of a statewide survey of active North Carolina general dentists (n=959, response rate=47%) was designed to quantify provision of prosthetic services. To determine contrasting rural and urban rates, responses were analyzed according to dentists'self-report of practice city size using analysis of covariance with percent of insured patients in the practice as the covariate. Mean per-patient-visit rates for crowns, fixed partial dentures, removable partial dentures, and extractions, as well as the distributions of treatment following tooth extraction, differed by city size, with practitioners in the smallest cities reporting treatment distributions reflecting more frequent loss of teeth and less frequent replacement. These differences in patterns of prosthetic care echo the limited existing information describing oral health status, provider supply, and receipt of care, all of which suggest that differential levels of access to care exist and lead to differences in oral health outcomes.