A Biotin–Avidin-Based Enzyme Immunoassay for βh-Endorphin

An avidin–biotin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is described for _h-endorphin (_h-EP). Microtiter plates coated with commercially available antibodies were used together with _h-EP tracer derivatives that were biotinylated in positions 24, 28, and 29 via a C₆ spacer arm. Nonspecific binding of biotinylated derivatives to the microtiter plates was blocked with a mixture of 1% casein and 10% ethanolamine in 0.1 M NaHCO₃. A sequential saturation procedure using a high-affinity antiserum in combination with an avidin–alkaline phosphatase complex matched the sensitivity of reported radioimmunoassays (RIAs), with a detection limit of 0.5 fmol/assay. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 5 and 12%, respectively. Results obtained by ELISA and RIA showed good correlations (r = 0.95). The -EP concentration in extracted rat plasma after high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) fractionation was determined by this method to be 1600 fmol/ml.     

Buprenorphine is an Antagonist at the ϰ Opioid Receptor

The effect of buprenorphine on bremazocine-induced diuresis was tested in the rat to determine the nature of buprenorphine's action at the opioid receptor. Both morphine-tolerant and naive rats were used to account for possible antidiuretic effects of buprenorphine at the µ site. Separate experiments established that the morphine pretreatment caused profound tolerance with respect to the antidiuretic action of µ agonists. Buprenorphine acted as a potent antagonist (ID₅₀ = 11µg/kg) of the diuretic action of the agonist bremazocine (ED₅₀ = l0 µg/kg). The similar potency of buprenorphine as an antagonist of bremazocine in naive and morphine-tolerant rats further supports the hypothesis that buprenorphine exerts it's antidiuresis via an antagonistic effect at sites, rather than as an agonist at the µ sites. The high affinity displayed by buprenorphine at the opioid receptor in vivo is consistent with this conclusion. Hence, buprenorphine can now be classified as a partial agonist at the µ site and as an antagonist at the site against bremazocine induced urine flow, while its action at the site to which it has much lower affinity in vivo remains unknown.     

Radiological and clinical comparisons of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis operated with rigid and dynamic instrumentation systems due to lumbar degenerative spinal diseases

BackgroundIt is extremely difficult to treat spine disorders with stabilization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Because revision rates are significantly higher in rigid stabilization. To date, there is no data about patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with dynamic stabilization. Our aim was to compare the radiological and clinical results of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent lumbar rigid stabilization or dynamic stabilization with Polyetheretherketone rod (PEEK).MethodsPatients with degenerative lumbar spine disease with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent dynamic stabilization between 2013 and 2015 and rigid stabilization between 2010 and 2012 were evaluated radiologically for adjacent segment disease, proximal junctional kyphosis, system problem (nonunion, screw loosening, instrumentation failure, pull out). It was also compared according to both the revision rates and the Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at the 12th month and 24th month.ResultsThe difference of decrease in Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores from preoperative to 12th month between patients who underwent dynamic stabilization and rigid stabilization was statistically insignificant. However, there was a significant difference of increase in Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores between the 12th month and 24th month of patients who underwent rigid stabilization, compared with patients with dynamic stabilization. In patients with dynamic stabilization, the problems of instrumentation were seen less frequently. Revision rates were high in patients with rigid stabilization when compared the patients with dynamic stabilization.ConclusionRadiological and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis operated with dynamic stabilization are more significant when compared to rigid stabilization. These patients have lower pain and disability scores in their follow up periods. Revision rates are lower in patients with dynamic stabilization.     

Primary hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the adult: a case report.

A 66-year-old male was admitted with a two-month history of vomiting and weight loss. Endoscopy showed a pyloric obstruction and the patient underwent subtotal gastrectomy with gastro- jejunostomy. The histopathological study of the specimen revealed primary hypertrophic pyloric stenosis without any evidence of duodenal peptic disease. In the adult, this is a rare cause of gastric outlet obstruction of unknown etiology. It is usually recognized by histopathological examination of the specimen after a gastric resection performed to treat gastric outlet obstruction syndrome. However, some endoscopic and radiological signs, such as the cervix sign, or elongation of the pyloric channel, may give clues about the presence of the disease preoperatively. In symptomatic cases, surgery is the preferred treatment modality.     

In vivo effect of losartan on platelet aggregation in patients with hypertension

The angiotensin II receptor, losartan, has been found to inhibit platelet aggregability to some extent in in vitro experiments. There have been conflicting results about the in vivo effects of losartan. We sought to clarify the in vivo effect of losartan on platelet aggregation. Forty patients with grade I essential hypertension were treated with losartan for 3 weeks. Platelet aggregation tests with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and ristocetin were analyzed and compared before and at the end of the study. Losartan effectively decreased systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure. Mean SBP before and after treatment was 159.6 ± 12.8 and 149.2 ± 17.3mmHg, respectively. Mean DBP decreased from 93.7 ± 8.2 to 87.7 ± 10.3mmHg after treatment. The results of the platelet aggregation tests with ADP and ristocetin were not significantly different when both rate and amplitude of maximal aggregation were included. Peak platelet aggregation with ADP regarding the lowest light transmission in the aggregometer was 59.8% ± 24.3% before and 58.3% ± 18.1% after the treatment. The same variables with ristocetin were 66.8% ± 21.6% and 60.8% ± 23.3%, respectively. In vivo effects of losartan on platelet aggregation with ADP and ristocetin were insignificant.     

A rare inguinal mass: Round ligament leiomyoma

INTRODUCTIONLeiomyoma of the round ligament is a rare condition and usually appears like an inguinal hernia.PRESENTATION OF CASEWe report a case of a 40 year-old women found to have an inguinal mass which it was finally diagnosed as leiomyoma.The patient was admitted to our hospital with a history of painless groin mass. The mass was thought to be irreducible inguinal hernia. Surgical exploration demonstrated a round ligament leiomyoma.DISCUSSIONA smooth muscle tumor in the round ligament of the uterus in the inguinal region is a rare entity and can be mistaken for an irreducible inguinal hernia. It is a rare condition occurring predominantly in premenopausal middle-aged women. Abdominal, inguinal, and vulvar locations have been described. Surgical excision is the curative treatment.CONCLUSIONLeiomyoma of the round ligament should be entertained as a possible etiology of inguinal mass.