Evidence on major gene control of cortical index in pedigree data from Middle Dalmatia,Croatia

It was recently reported that the inheritance of the metacarpal cortical index (CI) in the Chuvashian population can be described in terms of a major gene (MG) model. By applying transmission probability tests, the hypothesis was accepted that not only baseline level of CI but also its sex‐specific dependence on age were under control of the same putative large‐effect gene. Using a pedigree sample from the population of the islands of Middle Dalmatia, Croatia (847 observed individuals in 278 pedigrees), data are presented to support the above findings. The following hypotheses were accepted: (i) inheritance of baseline CI in the Croatian population can be attributed to the effect of a MG responsible for about 42% of the variation; (ii) the same MG takes part in the control of the dependence of CI on age, particularly the age at onset of involutive bone changes (inflection point), and of the rate of decrease in CI with age (slope coefficient). Issues related to the assortative mating effect on CI and the determination of the most parsimonious model are discussed. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 13:398–408, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Estimating global and regional morbidity from acute bacterial meningitis in children: assessment of the evidence

Aim

To estimate global morbidity from acute bacterial meningitis in children.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and Scopus databases to identify both community-based and hospital registry-based studies that could be useful in estimation of the global morbidity from bacterial meningitis in children. We were primarily interested in the availability and quality of the information on incidence rates and case-fatality rates. We assessed the impact of the year of study, study design, study setting, the duration of study, and sample size on reported incidence values, and also any association between incidence and case-fatality rate. We also categorized the studies by 6 World Health Organization regions and analyzed the plausibility of estimates derived from the current evidence using median and inter-quartile range of the available reports in each region.

Results

We found 71 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The only two significant associations between the reported incidence and studied covariates were the negative correlation between the incidence and sample size (P < 0.001) and positive correlation between incidence and case-fatality rate (P < 0.001). The median incidence per 100 000 child-years was highest in the African region – 143.6 (interquartile range [IQR] 115.6-174.6), followed by Western Pacific region with 42.9 (12.4-83.4), the Eastern Mediterranean region with 34.3 (9.9-42.0), South East Asia with 26.8 (21.0-60.3), Europe with 20.8 (16.2-29.7), and American region with 16.6 (10.3-33.7). The median case-fatality rate was also highest in the African region (31.3%). Globally, the median incidence for all 71 studies was 34.0 (16.0-88.0) per 100 000 child-years, with a median case-fatality rate of 14.4% (5.3%-26.2%).

Conclusions

Our study showed that there was now sufficient evidence to generate improved and internally consistent estimates of the global burden of acute bacterial meningitis in children. Although some of our region-specific estimates are very uncertain due to scarcity of data from the corresponding regions, the estimates of morbidity and case-fatality from childhood bacterial meningitis derived from this study are consistent with mortality estimates derived from multi-cause mortality studies. Both lines of evidence imply that bacterial meningitis is a cause of 2% of all child deaths.Meningitis is an infectious disease affecting the brain membrane and spinal cord (1). Globally, bacterial meningitis is the most severe type of meningitis, mainly caused by a triad of species Neisseria meningitidis, Streptocccus pneumonia, and Haemophilus influenzae (2). While viral meningitis is usually a self-limiting disease with good prognosis, bacterial meningitis is potentially fatal, requiring urgent medical assistance and management with antibiotics treatment (3). Various estimates of the burden of bacterial meningitis have been proposed to date, but they have mainly focused on mortality (4), long-term sequels (5), or etiology-specific morbidity and mortality (6-8).Interestingly, there have been no comprehensive attempts to estimate the overall global burden of bacterial meningitis in children. This is not surprising, because such attempt would face almost insurmountable methodological challenges. First, there is a problem with case definition of “bacterial meningitis” (9). In low resource settings, where the problem is most common, many children may present with “purulent meningitis,” whose cause is highly likely bacterial, but laboratory capacity may not be sufficient to isolate the causal agent and confirm the diagnosis. This leads to a discrepancy between morbidity burden estimates based on “all purulent meningitis” and “laboratory confirmed meningitis” – the latter always being lower than the former, but to a different extent in different contexts (10). The second large methodological obstacle is the problem of “meningitis belt.” The meningitis belt is the band of countries extending from Senegal to Ethiopia, characterized by semi-arid climate, dry seasons, and dusty winds, with seasonal outbreaks of meningococcal meningitis being recorded since the beginning of the 20th century (11). The problem with these epidemics is that they can last for several years and dramatically change the importance of meningococcus in comparison to the other two bacterial agents (S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae) both regionally and globally (11). This makes it difficult to express the “burden of disease” for any given year, because it will be very different in intra-epidemic and inter-epidemic years. Moreover, the extent of vaccine coverage against N. meningitidis, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae is changing the burden rapidly and rather dramatically in many places, rendering the scarce evidence from before the period of vaccination rather useless and indicates a need of revision (12). Finally, the emergence of HIV/AIDS pandemic led to a substantial number of infected children, whose resistance to other infections is impaired and they present a specific category of population in which the rates of incidence and case-fatality rates may be very different from those in other children (13).It is apparent that meningitis continues to contribute significantly to global mortality and morbidity, but the impact of the efforts to control it is difficult to estimate given that we do not have comprehensive estimates of global morbidity patterns. Understanding the global morbidity from bacterial meningitis would be useful because it would also help to validate the existing mortality estimates through application of appropriate case-fatality rates. The purpose of the present study is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the evidence that is available for estimating the global morbidity from acute bacterial meningitis in children globally. We will also propose initial, robust estimates of the burden, with suggestions on the possible ways to address the methodological challenges in future studies.     

Setting priorities in global child health research investments: assessment of principles and practice

This article reviews theoretical and practical approaches for setting priorities in global child health research investments. It also provides an overview of previous attempts to develop appropriate tools and methodologies to define priorities in health research investments. A brief review of the most important theoretical concepts that should govern priority setting processes is undertaken, showing how different perspectives, such as medical, economical, legal, ethical, social, political, rational, philosophical, stakeholder driven, and others will necessarily conflict each other in determining priorities. We specially address present research agenda in global child health today and how it relates to United Nation's (UN) Millennium Development Goal 4, which is to reduce child mortality by two-thirds between 1990 and 2015. The outcomes of these former approaches are evaluated and their benefits and shortcomings presented. The case for a new methodology for setting priorities in health research investments is presented, as proposed by Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative, and a need for its implementation in global child health is outlined. A transdisciplinary approach is needed to address all the perspectives from which investments into health research can be seen as priorities. This prioritization requires a process that is transparent, systematic, and that would take into account many perspectives and build on advantages of previous approaches.     

Setting priorities in global child health research investments: addressing values of stakeholders

Aim

To identify main groups of stakeholders in the process of health research priority setting and propose strategies for addressing their systems of values.

Methods

In three separate exercises that took place between March and June 2006 we interviewed three different groups of stakeholders: 1) members of the global research priority setting network; 2) a diverse group of national-level stakeholders from South Africa; and 3) participants at the conference related to international child health held in Washington, DC, USA. Each of the groups was administered different version of the questionnaire in which they were asked to set weights to criteria (and also minimum required thresholds, where applicable) that were a priori defined as relevant to health research priority setting by the consultants of the Child Health and Nutrition Research initiative (CHNRI).

Results

At the global level, the wide and diverse group of respondents placed the greatest importance (weight) to the criterion of maximum potential for disease burden reduction, while the most stringent threshold was placed on the criterion of answerability in an ethical way. Among the stakeholders’ representatives attending the international conference, the criterion of deliverability, answerability, and sustainability of health research results was proposed as the most important one. At the national level in South Africa, the greatest weight was placed on the criterion addressing the predicted impact on equity of the proposed health research.

Conclusions

Involving a large group of stakeholders when setting priorities in health research investments is important because the criteria of relevance to scientists and technical experts, whose knowledge and technical expertise is usually central to the process, may not be appropriate to specific contexts and in accordance with the views and values of those who invest in health research, those who benefit from it, or wider society as a whole.When decisions on investments in health research are made, the term “stakeholders” refers to all individuals and/or groups who have interest in prioritization of those investments. The stakeholders will therefore comprise a large and highly heterogeneous group. Some apparent examples may include research funding agencies (eg, governmental agencies, private organizations, public-private partnerships, international and regional organizations, and taxpayers of a certain region), direct recipients of the funding (eg, researchers and research institutions), beneficiaries of the research (eg, policy makers and the general population of a country), and any other group with interest in prioritization process (eg, advocacy groups, journalists and media, lawyers, economists, experts in ethics, and many others).Two fundamental characteristics of any acceptable and successful priority setting process are legitimacy and fairness (1). In order to ensure the legitimacy and fairness of the priority setting decisions in health research investments, involvement of a wide range of stakeholders (and/or eliciting their values) is needed. Unfortunately, health research priorities are presently mainly driven by technical experts (2-5). The results of prioritization are therefore in danger of being mostly influenced by their personal views, with minimal input from representatives from the wider community who also may have interest in the process but lack technical expertise. Since the values and criteria important to scientists and technical experts may vary remarkably from those of other relevant stakeholders (6-8), the relevance of eliciting wider stakeholders’ input is increasingly being acknowledged (9-11). However, the main challenge is to develop a systematic, flexible, and repeatable strategy on how this can be achieved in different contexts.The literature on priority setting for health interventions identifies two main strategies: 1) stakeholders’ values may impact decisions through procedural processes (by having access to the decisions and the rationales behind the decisions, and by having the authority to deliberate on the decisions and influence the final outcome); 2) stakeholders’ values can be directly elicited using quantitative methods (through surveys where respondents rank, weigh, or rate their values) and qualitative methods (involving individual interviews, Delphi technique, complaints procedures or group discussions, concept mapping, citizen’s jury, and public meetings) (12). The main challenges in those attempts have mainly been the lack of capacity for some stakeholders to engage in meaningful deliberations (13) and how to practically incorporate the elicited stakeholders’ values in decision-making (12,14). This paper presents our suggestions and experiences on how the values and interests of large and diverse group of stakeholders could still be incorporated in decisions on health research investment priorities. We specified thresholds and weights needed to address stakeholders’ values within CHNRI methodology using three different versions of a questionnaire. We aimed to assess stakeholders’ values for priority setting in global health research investments. We tested questionnaires that presented different levels of complexity and detail of the questions that stakeholders’ representatives would be asked. We also aimed to evaluate different strategies of turning their responses into numerical thresholds and weights.     

Fertility-sparing surgery for patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: 10 years of clinical experience from a tertiary referral center

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics - To describe a case series of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT) treated exclusively with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) with or...     

Red cell distribution width is a potent prognostic parameter for in-hospital and post-discharge mortality in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a registry-based cohort study on 3941 patients

AimTo investigate clinical and prognostic associations of red cell distribution width (RDW) in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 3941 consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary-level institution from March 2020 to March 2021 who had available RDW on admission.ResultsThe median age was 74 years. The median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 4. The majority of patients (84.1%) on admission presented with severe or critical COVID-19. Patients with higher RDW were significantly more likely to be older and female, to present earlier during infection, and to have higher comorbidity burden, worse functional status, and critical presentation of COVID-19 on admission. RDW was not significantly associated with C-reactive protein, occurrence of pneumonia, or need for oxygen supplementation on admission. During hospital stay, patients with higher RDW were significantly more likely to require high-flow oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit, and to experience prolonged immobilization, venous thromboembolism, bleeding, and bacterial sepsis. Thirty-day and post-hospital discharge mortality gradually increased with each rising RDW percent-point. In a series of multivariate Cox-regression models, RDW demonstrated robust prognostic properties at >14% cut-off level. This cut-off was associated with inferior 30-day and post-discharge survival independently of COVID-19 severity, age, and CCI; and with 30-day survival independently of COVID severity and established prognostic scores (CURB-65, 4C-mortality, COVID-gram and VACO-index).ConclusionRDW has a complex relationship with COVID-19-associated inflammatory state and is affected by prior comorbidities. RDW can improve the prognostication in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a systemic infectious disease usually presenting with fever and respiratory symptoms (1). Although the most frequent serious manifestation of COVID-19 is pneumonia, the disease has been associated with cardiovascular, neurological, and gastrointestinal symptoms (2). Systemic inflammatory response mediated by high interleukin-6 concentrations induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with more severe clinical presentation, respiratory deterioration, and death (3,4). The presence of prior chronic comorbidities substantially affects the survival of COVID-19 patients (1).Anisocytosis, ie, unequal red blood cells (RBC) size, is a sensitive marker of distress in erythropoiesis or RBC destruction. It can be induced by various metabolic and inflammatory stimuli, nutrient deficiencies, infections, spleen disorders, and specific drugs interfering with RBC production (5). Anisocytosis can be quantified as a coefficient of variation of mean cell volume termed red blood cell distribution width (RDW), which is obtained by automatic cell counters. Higher RDW levels have recently gained attention as they are uniformly associated with unfavorable presentation and inferior outcomes in many chronic metabolic and malignant diseases (6-12). More severe clinical presentation and higher mortality rates were also found in COVID-19 patients with higher RDW levels (13-16). However, an association of RDW with other clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, as well as the relationship with increased mortality in the context of other established prognostic scores, are not well defined. Thus, we aimed to investigate clinical and prognostic significance of RDW in a large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from our institution. We hypothesized that RDW was associated with more severe COVID-19 on admission and higher death rate.     

Association of Tagging Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on 8 Candidate Genes in Dopaminergic Pathway with Schizophrenia in Croatian Population

Aim

To perform a comprehensive evaluation of association of common genetic variants in candidate genes in the dopaminergic pathway with schizophrenia in a sample from Croatian population.

Methods

A case-control association study was performed on 104 unrelated patients with schizophrenia recruited from a psychiatric hospital in Zagreb and 131 phenotypically normal Croatian subjects. Forty-nine tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) in 8 candidate genes in the dopaminergic pathway were identified from the HapMap database and tested for association. Genotyping was performed using the SNPlex platform. Statistical analysis was conducted to assess allelic and genotypic associations between cases and controls using a goodness of fit χ² test and trend test, respectively; adjustment for multiple testing was done by permutation based analysis.

Results

Significant allele frequency differences between schizophrenia cases and controls were observed at 4 tagSNPs located in the genes DRD5, HTR1B1, DBH, and TH1 (P < 0.005). A trend test also confirmed the genotypic association (P < 0.001) of these 4 tagSNPs. Additionally, moderate association (P < 0.05) was observed with 8 tagSNPs on SLC6A3, DBH, DRD4, SLC6A4, and COMT.

Conclusions

Common genetic variants in genes involved in the dopaminergic pathway are associated with schizophrenia in the populations of Caucasian descent.Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling brain disease affecting about 1% of the global population (1). There is substantial evidence that genetic factors are involved in the etiology of the disease (2). High heritability (~ 80%) and higher concordance in monozygotic (~ 50%) than in dizygotic (~ 17%) twins are strong indicators for an inherited basis of schizophrenia (3-5). During the past decade, numerous loci and plausible candidate genes have been identified by linkage and association studies. However, the findings have remained inconclusive (2,6). Like other complex diseases, a complex genetic etiology compounded by involvement of other non-genetic factors has hindered the precise identification of schizophrenia gene variants. Second, a major limitation in most association studies has been testing of a few variants within a gene of interest rather than a thorough assessment of the entire gene region. With the availability of the sequence of the genome and large body of data on human genetic variation from the HapMap project (7), it is now possible to undertake more comprehensive association studies.Genes involved in the dopamine pathway are biologically plausible candidates in schizophrenia susceptibility. In this study, we report on the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 8 dopaminergic genes (DRD4, DRD5, SLC6A3, SLC6A4, HTR1B, DBH, TH, and COMT) with schizophrenia in a Caucasian sample from Croatia. We performed a comprehensive association study using tagging SNPs (tagSNPs). Overall, 49 tagSNPs were identified from the HapMap database (7), 4 of which showed strong evidence of association with schizophrenia susceptibility.     

Association of Nephrolithiasis and Gene for Glucose Transporter Type 9 (SLC2A9): Study of 145 Patients

Aim

To investigate the association of nephrolithiasis and solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter, member 9 (SLC2A9), also known as glucose transporter type 9, Glut9.

Methods

A total of 145 participants were recruited in the period April-October 2008 from the Department of Mineral Research of the Medical School Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 58 (40%) had confirmed nephrolithiasis and 87 (60%) were asymptomatic. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) from the SLC2A9 gene were genotyped in both groups (rs733175, rs6449213, rs1014290, and rs737267).

Results

There was a weak but significant association of all 4 SNPs and nephrolithiasis (P = 0.029 for rs733175; P = 0.006 for rs6449213; P = 0.020 for rs1014290, and P = 0.011 for rs737267). Logistic regression in an age- and sex-adjusted model suggested that genotype C/T for rs6449213 had odds ratio for nephrolithiasis of 2.89 (95% confidence interval 1.13-7.40). This SNP explained a total of 4.4% of nephrolithiasis variance.

Conclusion

Development of nephrolithiasis may be associated with SLC2A9 gene. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of SLC2A9 gene as a link between uric acid and nephrolithiasis.Renal stone formation (nephrolithiasis) is a disease characterized by the existence of solid deposits in the upper parts of the urinary tract (1). It is estimated to affect between 3%-9% of the population, with large differences between various populations (2,3). There is a number of causes that may lead to the renal stones formation, including diet and obesity status, some drugs, other diseases, climate changes, metabolic disorders, and genetic factors (2,4,5). The complexity of this disease caused researchers to consider nephrolithiasis as one feature of a broader systemic disease, rather than a local disease restricted to a single organic system (6). This is especially interesting in relation to gout and metabolic syndrome, which are both systemic disorders in close relation to nephrolithiasis (6-8). Even the cohort studies have confirmed the association of gout and kidney stones, suggesting that the history of gout increases the risk for kidney stones (9). Another study showed that, in the age-adjusted model, gout had an odds ratio of 1.97 for previous kidney stones (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.83) and that even after adjustment for sex, race, body mass index, and presence of hypertension the odds ratio remained significant (10).Genetic contribution to renal stones formation has been identified long time ago (2). In line with these suggestions, heritability of some of the traits associated with nephrolithiasis has been shown to be as high as 95% (11). Heritability of the urinary stones was reported to be lower (56%) (12), but still sufficiently high to be considered a substantial genetic proportion of variance and suggesting that it may be under genetic control. So far, a number of studies have established a link between predominantly oxalate kidney stones and several genes, including vitamin-D receptor gene (VDR) and calcitonin receptor (CTR) gene (13), heparan sulfate (HSPG2) gene (14), or fibronectin gene (FN1) (14).The quantitative trait associated with nephrolithiasis is the serum uric acid concentration, which is under strong genetic control by the gene for glucose transporter type 9 (SLC2A9 or Glut 9) (15). The gene was initially described in an isolated island community (16,17), where genetic properties of the population are expected to act in favor of facilitated gene mapping efforts (18). Subsequent meta-analysis of 14 populations confirmed the association of this gene with serum uric acid concentrations (19). This led to a number of clinical studies that have confirmed its involvement in the uric acid metabolism, including urate handling in the kidney and uptake in the liver (20,21). Based on the previous suggestions that gout and nephrolithiasis may share a common pathway (15), it might be interesting to see if SLC2A9 could explain the commonalities in patients with any of the following conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association of nephrolithiasis and genetic variants of the SLC2A9.