New technologies in health care. Part 1: A moral and ethical predicament

With the rapid evolution of technology and the development and marketing of new procedures in dentistry, dentists have difficulty keeping pace with all of this new technology and information. How do these clinicians know whether a new product, technique or technological advance is good and should be recommended? At what point do they have an obligation to inform their patients about new procedures supported by research? This first report of a 2-part series investigates the ethical aspects of these issues and describes some of the professional ethical dilemmas and obligations involved when new therapies are offered to the public.     

Antimicrobial barrier of an in vitro oral epithelial model

OBJECTIVE: Oral epithelia function as a microbial barrier and are actively involved in recognizing and responding to bacteria. Our goal was to examine a tissue engineered model of buccal epithelium for its response to oral bacteria and proinflammatory cytokines and compare the tissue responses with those of a submerged monolayer cell culture. DESIGN: The tissue model was characterized for keratin and beta-defensin expression. Altered expression of beta-defensins was evaluated by RT-PCR after exposure of the apical surface to oral bacteria and after exposure to TNF-alpha in the medium. These were compared to the response in traditional submerged oral epithelial cell culture. RESULTS: The buccal model showed expression of differentiation specific keratin 13, hBD1 and hBD3 in the upper half of the tissue; hBD2 was not detected. hBD1 mRNA was constitutively expressed, while hBD2 mRNA increased 2-fold after exposure of the apical surface to three oral bacteria tested and hBD3 mRNA increased in response to the non-pathogenic bacteria tested. In contrast, hBD2 mRNA increased 3-600-fold in response to bacteria in submerged cell culture. HBD2 mRNA increased over 100-fold in response to TNF-alpha in the tissue model and 50-fold in submerged cell culture. Thus, the tissue model is capable of upregulating hBD2, however, the minimal response to bacteria suggests that the tissue has an effective antimicrobial barrier due to its morphology, differentiation, and defensin expression. CONCLUSIONS: The oral mucosal model is differentiated, expresses hBD1 and hBD3, and has an intact surface with a functional antimicrobial barrier.     

A comparative study of reducing the extracellular potassium concentration in red blood cells by washing and by reduction of additive solution

BACKGROUND: Extracellular potassium concentration (K(+)) increases in the supernatant of whole and packed red blood cell units (pRBCs) with duration of refrigerated storage in citrate-phosphate-dextrose-adenine (CPDA-1) and additive solution (AS). Studies have shown that to avoid hyperkalemia, washed pRBCs are preferred if relatively fresh pRBCs are not available. To determine whether a simpler procedure, AS reduction, results in lowering of K(+) in pRBCs comparable to that achieved by washing, the K(+) levels by both methods were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Pre- and post-K(+) levels were measured in 6 washed and 11 AS-reduced pRBC units. Each unit was weighed, hematocrit was determined, K(+) was measured, and total K(+) was calculated. Washed units were 3 to 21 and AS-reduced units were 4 to 30 days old. Statistical analysis was performed with a t test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p > 0.35) in the initial K(+) between the two groups (mean +/- SD, 36.95 +/- 13.16 mEq/L before washing and 39.78 +/- 19.94 mEq/L before AS reduction). Washing and AS reduction both led to a significant decrease in K(+) levels (2.15 +/- 0.10 mEq/L after washing and 4.41 +/- 3.04 mEq/L after AS reduction, each p < 0.0005). Washing, however, was significantly better than AS reduction in reducing K(+) in stored pRBCs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Washing pRBCs results in very low levels of K(+). AS reduction also significantly reduces K(+) levels. Selection of the method of K(+) reduction will depend on the stringency of K(+) reduction needed, the time constraints, and the availability of facilities and staff for washing.     

Use of sodium concentration and anion gap to improve correlation between serum chloride and bicarbonate concentrations

Although most acid-base disorders cause opposite and equal changes in serum chloride and bicarbonate concentrations, this inverse relationship can be distorted by changes in the anion gap and/or water balance. Therefore, we examined the relationship between chloride and bicarbonate before and after adjusting for anion gap and serum sodium concentration. Patients with abnormal electrolytes were grouped by chloride and bicarbonate concentrations (low, normal, and high). Then, chloride and anion gap-adjusted bicarbonate were adjusted for water excess (or deficit), manifesting as hyponatremia (or hypernatremia), after which patients were reclassified. Classification by chloride and bicarbonate changed in 82% of the 135 patients after adjustment for anion gap and sodium. Serum chloride and bicarbonate were each low (concordant) in 23 patients, while 18 had discordant chlorides and bicarbonates (9 low/high, 9 high/low). After adjustments, chloride and bicarbonate were discordant in 40 patients (31 low/high, 9 high/low) and concordant in none. The correlation between serum chloride and bicarbonate improved from -0.459 to -0.998 after adjustments for sodium and anion gap. A very close inverse relationship between serum chloride and bicarbonate concentrations is commonly distorted by concomitant water disturbances and anion gap acidoses in internal medicine patients admitted with electrolyte disorders.