18F-FDG PET/CT在胃癌中的临床应用进展

胃癌是全球范围内最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET/CT在胃癌中的应用既有优点又有局限性。胃癌原发灶对18F-FDG的摄取与癌症分期、组织学分型和肿瘤大小密切相关。早期胃癌18F-FDG摄取阳性预示着内镜黏膜下剥离术的不可治愈性。进展期胃癌的最大标准化摄取值（SUV_max）在肠型与印戒细胞癌（SRC）或弥漫型胃癌间的差异显著,SRC的SUV_max与患者的总生存时间和无病生存时间呈负相关。18F-FDG PET/CT对区域淋巴结转移的诊断灵敏度较低,但其特异度很高,区域淋巴结对18F-FDG摄取呈阳性是预后不良的指征。18F-FDG PET/CT可检出隐匿的远处转移（7.2%~10.0%）,其中大部分（4.7%~8.8%）使用腹腔镜也不能检出。常规性应用18F-FDG PET/CT并联合腹腔镜检查对明确胃癌分期的意义重大。因此,笔者就18F-FDG PET/CT在胃癌中的临床应用进展进行综述。     

Clinical role of (18)F-FDG PET for initial staging of patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer

In extrahepatic bile duct cancer, preoperative evaluation is important because only surgical excision of all detectable tumours is associated with improvement in 5-year survival. However, morphological imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT), are still insufficient for accurate staging. The purpose of this study was to assess the additional value, in relation to CT, of 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) for the evaluation of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Thirty patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer underwent both (18)F-FDG PET and CT for initial staging. The results of the two modalities for evaluation of primary tumours and regional lymph nodes were compared with the final diagnoses based on pathological or clinical findings. The primary tumours were interpreted as malignant on the basis of CT in 24 (80%) of the patients, while (18)F-FDG PET revealed increased (18)F-FDG uptake in 18 (60%) of them. On the other hand, (18)F-FDG PET showed focal accumulation of (18)F-FDG in the bile duct in three of the six patients with equivocal findings on CT. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT for regional lymph node metastases were 54%, 59% and 57%, while those of (18)F-FDG PET were 38%, 100% and 73%, respectively. The specificity of (18)F-FDG PET for regional lymph node metastases was significantly higher than that of CT ( P<0.01). Of 14 patients with N1 or N2 disease diagnosed by CT, only seven (50%) had a final diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis. In these 14 patients, (18)F-FDG PET accurately evaluated the N component of the disease in 12 patients (86%). In conclusion, in the initial staging of patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer, (18)F-FDG PET offers additional value in relation to CT in evaluating both the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes.     

Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography

Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of an all-in-one protocol of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography with the diagnostic accuracy of a multimodality algorithm for initial breast cancer staging. METHODS: Forty women (mean age, 58.3 y; range, 30.8-78.4 y; SD, 12 y) with suspected breast cancer were included. For the primary tumor, we compared 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography versus MRI mammography; for axillary lymph node status, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus clinical investigation and ultrasound; and for distant metastases, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus a multimodality staging algorithm. Histopathology and clinical follow-up served as the standard of reference. The Fisher exact test evaluated the significance of differences (P < 0.05). Alterations in patient management caused by 18F-FDG PET/CT were documented. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the detection rate of breast cancer lesions (18F-FDG PET/CT, 95%; MRI, 100%; P = 1). 18F-FDG PET/CT correctly classified lesion focality significantly more often than did MRI (18F-FDG PET/CT, 79%; MRI, 73%; P < 0.001). MRI correctly defined the T stage significantly more often than did 18F-FDG PET/CT (MRI, 77%; 18F-FDG PET/CT, 54%; P = 0.001). 18F-FDG PET/CT detected axillary lymph node metastases in 80% of cases; clinical investigation/ultrasound, in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.067). Distant metastases were detected with 18F-FDG PET/CT in 100% of cases, and the multimodality algorithm identified distant metastases in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 1). Three patients had extraaxillary lymph node metastases that were detected only by PET/CT (cervical, retroperitoneal, mediastinal/internal mammary group). 18F-FDG PET/CT changed patient management in 12.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography protocol may be used for staging breast cancer in a single session. This initial assessment of the 18F-FDG PET/CT protocol indicates similar accuracy to MRI for the detection of breast cancer lesions. Although MRI seems to be more accurate when assessing the T stage of the tumor, 18F-FDG PET/CT seems able to more accurately define lesion focality. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography was able to detect axillary lymph node metastases with a high sensitivity, this method cannot soon be expected to replace the combination of clinical examination, ultrasound, and sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary assessment.     

Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT.

This study was performed to compare (18)F-FDG PET with CT for the evaluation of primary tumors and lymph node metastases in gastric cancer. METHODS: Eighty-one patients (28 women and 53 men; mean age, 56.6 y; age range; 32-82 y) who had undergone radical (n = 74) or palliative (n = 7) gastrectomy and lymph node dissection for the management of gastric cancer were included. Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET and CT were reviewed retrospectively for primary tumors of the stomach and lymph node metastases. Any increased (18)F-FDG uptake exceeding that of the adjacent normal gastric wall was considered positive for the primary tumor. Lymph nodes were classified into 3 groups based on their anatomic sites. Because perigastric lymph nodes (N1) were often not clearly differentiated from primary tumors, N1 lymph node metastases were determined when possible. Lymph nodes were considered positive or negative on the basis of the group as a whole. Final conclusions for primary tumors and lymph node metastases were based on histopathologic specimens in all patients. RESULTS: There were 17 patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and 64 patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). For primary tumors, both PET and CT showed a sensitivity of 47% (8/17) for EGC and 98% (63/64) for AGC. The sensitivity of CT for N1 disease was significantly higher than that of PET. (18)F-FDG PET had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 34% (11/32), 96% (47/49), and 72% (58/81), respectively, for N2 metastases, whereas the corresponding CT values were 44% (14/32), 86% (42/49), and 69% (56/81). For N3 metastases, PET and CT had the same sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: 50% (3/6), 99% (74/75), and 95% (77/81), respectively. Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET were not significantly different from those of CT for primary tumors or for N2 and N3 metastases. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET is as accurate as CT for the detection of primary tumors of either EGC or AGC. The low sensitivities of PET and CT were insufficient to allow decision making on the extent of lymphadenectomy. In contrast, the high specificity of PET for N disease appeared valuable, and the presence of N disease on PET may have a clinically significant impact on the choice of initial therapy.     

Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and staging of primary and recurrent malignant head and neck tumours in comparison with conventional imaging methods [including ultrasonography, radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], physical examination, panendoscopy and biopsies in clinical routine. A total of 54 patients (13 female, 41 male, age 61.3+/-12 years) were investigated retrospectively. Three groups were formed. In group I, 18F-FDG PET was performed in 15 patients to detect unknown primary cancers. In group II, 24 studies were obtained for preoperative staging of proven head and neck cancer. In group III, 18F-FDG PET was used in 15 patients to monitor tumour recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. In all patients, imaging was obtained at 70 min after the intravenous administration of 180 MBq 18F-FDG. In 11 of the 15 patients in group I, the primary cancer could be found with 18F-FDG, yielding a detection rate of 73.3%. In 4 of the 15 patients, CT findings were also suggestive of the primary cancer but were nonetheless equivocal. In these patients, 18F-FDG showed increased 18F-FDG uptake by the primary tumour, which was confirmed by histology. One patient had recurrence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with 18F-FDG PET, but was detected by CT. In three cases, the primary cancer could not be found with any imaging method. Among the 24 patients in group II investigated for staging purposes, 18F-FDG PET detected a total of 13 local and three distant lymph node metastases, whereas the conventional imaging methods detected only nine local and one distant lymph node metastases. The results of 18F-FDG PET led to an upstaging in 5/24 (20.8%) patients. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in 5/24 (20.8%). There was one false positive result using 18F-FDG PET. Among the 15 patients of group III with suspected recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, 18F-FDG was true positive in 7/15 (46.6%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). The conventional imaging methods were true positive in 5/15 (33.3%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). One false negative (6.6%) and three false positive findings (20%) on 18F-FDG PET were due to inflamed tissue. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in three (20%) and false negative in three cases (20%). It is concluded that in comparison to conventional diagnostic methods, 18F-FDG PET provides additional and clinically relevant information in the detection of primary and metastatic carcinomas as well as in the early detection of recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET should therefore be performed early in clinical routine, usually before CT or MRI.     

18F-FDG PET/CT在原发灶不明的脑转移瘤中的诊断价值

目的 探讨18F-FDG PET/CT在查找原发灶不明的脑转移瘤中的价值。 方法 回顾性分析17例原发灶不明的脑转移瘤患者的全身18F-FDG PET/CT检查资料。 结果 17例患者均经活检确诊原发灶,准确率100%。原发性肺癌13例,占76%,其中有2例在第二次行PET/CT检查时才检出原发灶;原发性肝癌2例,占12%;原发性贲门癌1例,占6%;原发性升结肠癌1例,占6%。在检查到原发灶的基础上,18F-FDG PET/CT亦发现10例合并转移者,其中合并肺转移者2例、合并淋巴结转移者3例、合并骨转移者2例及合并其他部位转移者3例,共发现病灶61处;2例肝癌患者单发脑转移灶中均有脑卒中。 结论 18F-FDG PET/CT在查找原发灶不明的脑转移瘤原发灶中有重要价值,并为临床分期及治疗提供有利帮助。     

Positron emission tomography with 11C-acetate and 18F-FDG in prostate cancer patients

Visualisation of primary prostate cancer, its relapse and its metastases is a clinically relevant problem despite the availability of state-of-the-art methods such as CT, MRI, transrectal ultrasound and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of carbon-11 acetate and (18)F-FDG PET in the detection of prostate cancer and its metastases. Twenty-five patients were investigated during the follow-up of primary prostate cancer, suspected relapse or metastatic disease using (11)C-acetate PET; 15 of these patients were additionally investigated using (18)F-FDG PET. Fourteen patients were receiving anti-androgen treatment at the time of the investigation. Lesions were detected in 20/24 (83%) patients using (11)C-acetate PET and in 10/15 (75%) patients using (18)F-FDG PET. Based on the results of both PET scans, one patient was diagnosed with recurrent lung cancer. Median (18)F-FDG uptake exceeded that of (11)C-acetate in distant metastases (SUV =3.2 vs 2.3). However, in local recurrence and in regional lymph node metastases, (11)C-acetate uptake (median SUVs =2.9 and 3.8, respectively) was higher than that of (18)F-FDG (median SUVs =1.0 and 1.1, respectively). A positive correlation was observed between serum PSA level and both (11)C-acetate uptake and (18)F-FDG uptake. (11)C-acetate seems more useful than (18)F-FDG in the detection of local recurrences and regional lymph node metastases. (18)F-FDG, however, appears to be more accurate in visualising distant metastases. There may be a role for combined (11)C-acetate/(18)F-FDG PET in the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and persisting or increasing PSA.     

Comparison of (11)C-choline and (18)F-FDG PET in primary diagnosis and staging of patients with thoracic cancer.

PET with (18)F-FDG is used for detection and staging of thoracic cancer; however, more specific PET radiopharmaceuticals would be welcome. (11)C-labeled choline (CHOL) is a new radiopharmaceutical potentially useful for tumor imaging, since it is incorporated into cell membranes as phosphatidylcholine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether (11)C-CHOL PET has advantages over (18)F-FDG PET in patients with thoracic cancer. METHODS: We evaluated 17 patients with thoracic cancer both with (11)C-CHOL PET and (18)F-FDG PET. After transmission scanning, (11)C-CHOL was injected intravenously, and whole-body scanning was started after 5 min. Immediately thereafter, (18)F-FDG was injected intravenously, followed after 90 min by interleaved attenuation-corrected whole-body scanning. Scans were performed from crown to femur. Visual and quantitative (standardized uptake value) analyses of (11)C-CHOL PET and (18)F-FDG PET were performed and compared with results of traditional staging and follow-up. RESULTS: The most prominent features of normal (11)C-CHOL distribution were high uptake in liver, renal cortex, and salivary glands. Except for some uptake in choroid plexus and pituitary gland, brain uptake was negligible. All primary thoracic tumors were detected with (11)C-CHOL PET and (18)F-FDG PET. Both (11)C-CHOL PET and (18)F-FDG PET correctly identified all 16 patients with lymph node involvement. However, in a lesion-to-lesion analysis, (11)C-CHOL PET detected only 29 of 43 metastatic lymph nodes, whereas (18)F-FDG PET detected 41 of 43. (11)C-CHOL PET detected fewer intrapulmonary and pleural metastases than (18)F-FDG PET (27/47 vs. 46/47). More brain metastases were detected with (11)C-CHOL PET (23/23) than with (18)F-FDG PET (3/23). For primary tumors, the median (range) standard uptake values of (11)C-CHOL and (18)F-FDG were 1.68 (0.98-3.22) and 4.22 (1.40-8.26), respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: (11)C-CHOL PET can be used to visualize thoracic cancers. Although detection of lymph node metastases with (11)C-CHOL PET was inferior compared with (18)F-FDG PET, the detection of brain metastases was superior.     

18F-FDG PET/CT显像在恶性胸膜间皮瘤诊断中的价值

目的 探讨18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT显像在恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)诊断中的临床价值及原发肿瘤病灶平均标准摄取值(SUVmax)对患者预后的判断价值.方法 回顾性总结17例2002-2008年临床疑诊MPM患者18F-FDG PET/CT显像资料,测量病灶的SUVmax.将病理检查及临床随访证实的MPM患者按照有无转移分为2组,测定每例患者原发肿瘤病灶的SUVmax,用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价SUVmax对患者转移与否的诊断价值,判断预后.采用SPSS 11.0软件进行t检验.结果 经病理及随访结果证实MPM 12例,良性胸膜病变5例,二者的SUVmax分别为5.78±1.81和2.72±2.51,差异有统计学意义(t=2.8,P<0.05).全身18F-FDG PET/CT显像诊断MPM的灵敏度为100%(12/12),特异性为4/5,准确性为94%(16/17),18F-FDG PET/CT显像有7例MPM伴有骨和(或)淋巴结转移.SUVmaxROC曲线分析表明曲线下面积(AUC)为0.80.结论 全身18F-FDG PET/CT显像对于MPM的诊断有重要价值.原发肿瘤病灶SUVmax越高越易发生转移,预后越差.     

Comparison of 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET in esophageal cancer.

18F-FDG PET has gained acceptance for staging of esophageal cancer. However, FDG is not tumor specific and false-positive results may occur by accumulation of FDG in benign tissue. The tracer 18F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) might not have these drawbacks. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of 18F-FLT PET for the detection and staging of esophageal cancer and to compare 18F-FLT PET with 18F-FDG PET. Furthermore, the correlation between 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake and proliferation of the tumor was investigated. METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy-proven cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction were staged with CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and ultrasound of the neck. In addition, all patients underwent a whole-body 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET. Standardized uptake values were compared with proliferation expressed by Ki-67 positivity. RESULTS: 18F-FDG PET was able to detect all esophageal cancers, whereas 18F-FLT PET visualized the tumor in 8 of 10 patients. Both 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FLT PET detected lymph node metastases in 2 of 8 patients. 18F-FDG PET detected 1 cervical lymph node that was missed on 18F-FLT PET, whereas 18F-FDG PET showed uptake in benign lesions in 2 patients. The uptake of 18F-FDG (median standardized uptake value [SUV(mean)], 6.0) was significantly higher than 18F-FLT (median SUV(mean), 3.4). Neither 18F-FDG maximum SUV (SUV(max)) nor 18F-FLT SUV(max) correlated with Ki-67 expression in the linear regression analysis. CONCLUSION: In this study, uptake of 18F-FDG in esophageal cancer is significantly higher compared with 18F-FLT uptake. 18F-FLT scans show more false-negative findings and fewer false-positive findings than do 18F-FDG scans. Uptake of 18F-FDG or 18F-FLT did not correlate with proliferation.     

18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI.

(18)F-FDG PET has a high accuracy in staging head and neck cancer, but its role in patients with clinically and radiographically negative necks (N0) is less clear. In particular, the value of combined PET/CT has not been determined in this group of patients. METHODS: In a prospective study, 31 patients with oral cancer and no evidence of lymph node metastases by clinical examination or CT/MRI underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT before elective neck dissection. PET/CT findings were recorded by neck side (left or right) and lymph node level. PET/CT findings were compared with histopathology of dissected nodes, which was the standard of reference. RESULTS: Elective neck dissections (26 unilateral, 5 bilateral; a total of 36 neck sides), involving 142 nodal levels, were performed. Only 13 of 765 dissected lymph nodes harbored metastases. Histopathology revealed nodal metastases in 9 of 36 neck sides and 9 of 142 nodal levels. PET was TP in 6 nodal levels (6 neck sides), false-negative in 3 levels (3 neck sides), true-negative in 127 levels (23 neck sides), and false-positive in 6 levels (4 neck sides). The 3 false-negative findings occurred in metastases smaller than 3 mm or because of inability to distinguish between primary tumor and adjacent metastasis. TP and false-positive nodes exhibited similar standardized uptakes (4.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.0; P = not significant). Sensitivity and specificity were 67% and 85% on the basis of neck sides and 67% and 95% on the basis of number of nodal levels, respectively. If a decision regarding the need for neck dissection had been based solely on PET/CT, 3 false-negative necks would have been undertreated, and 4 false-positive necks would have been overtreated. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT can identify lymph node metastases in a segment of patients with oral cancer and N0 neck. A negative test can exclude metastatic deposits with high specificity. Despite reasonably high overall accuracy, however, the clinical application of PET/CT in the N0 neck may be limited by the combination of limited sensitivity for small metastatic deposits and a relatively high number of false-positive findings. The surgical management of the N0 neck should therefore not be based on PET/CT findings alone.     

18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.

Accurate evaluation of primary tumors and cervical lymph node status of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity is important to treatment planning and prognosis prediction. In this prospective study, we evaluated the use of 18F-FDG PET, CT/MRI, and their visual correlation for the identification of primary tumors and cervical nodal metastases of SCC of the oral cavity with histologic correlation. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients with pathologically proven diagnoses of oral cavity SCC underwent 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI within 2 wk before surgery. We interpreted 18F-FDG PET, CT/MRI, and visually correlated 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI separately to assess the primary tumors and their regional lymph node status. We recorded lymph node metastases according to the neck level system of imaging-based nodal classification. Histopathologic analysis was used as the gold standard for assessment of the primary tumors and lymph node involvement. We analyzed differences in sensitivity and specificity among the imaging modalities using the McNemar test. The receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve and calculation of the area under the curve were used to evaluate their discriminative power. RESULTS: The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET, CT/MRI, and their visual correlation for the identification of primary tumors was 98.4%, 87.1%, and 99.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET for the identification of nodal metastases on a level-by-level basis was 22.1% higher than that of CT/MRI (74.7% vs. 52.6%, P < 0.001), whereas the specificity of 18F-FDG PET was 1.5% lower than that of CT/MRI (93.0% vs. 94.5%, P = 0.345). The sensitivity and specificity of the visual correlation of 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI were 3.2% and 1.5% higher than those of 18F-FDG PET alone (77.9% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.25; 94.5% vs. 93.0%, P = 0.18, respectively). The area under the curve obtained from the ROC curve showed that 18F-FDG PET was significantly superior to CT/MRI for total nodal detection (0.896 vs. 0.801, P = 0.002), whereas the visual correlation of 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI was modestly superior to 18F-FDG PET alone (0.913 vs. 0.896, P = 0.28). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET is superior to CT/MRI in the detection of cervical status of oral cavity SCC. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET for the detection of cervical nodal metastasis on a level-by-level basis was significantly higher than that of CT/MRI, whereas their specificities appeared to be similar. Visual correlation of 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI showed a trend of increased diagnostic accuracy over 18F-FDG PET alone but without a statistically significant difference, and its sensitivity was still not high enough to replace pathologic lymph node staging based on neck dissection.     

CT及18F-FDGPET/CT诊断食管癌术前淋巴结转移及N分期对比研究

目的 研究CT及18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET/CT术前诊断食管癌淋巴结转移及确定N分期的价值.资料与方法 连续随机选择经食管镜或胃镜证实、拟行手术治疗、能够耐受手术的47例食管癌患者,术前1周内行CT及18F-FDG PET/CT检查,以术后病理为“金标准”,比较CT及18F-FDG PET/CT诊断食管癌淋巴结转移及N分期的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值.结果 31例存在淋巴结转移,共切除并分离淋巴结387枚(209组),其中65枚(46组)发现转移.CT诊断淋巴结转移的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为53.8％、92.8％、86.3％、60.3％和90.9％;18F-FDG PET/CT分别为89.2％、93.8％、93.0％、74.4％和97.7％.PET/CT诊断淋巴结转移的敏感性、准确性及阴性预测值均显著高于CT,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),特异性及阳性预测值差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).CT及18F-FDG PET/CT确定淋巴结分期的准确率分别为74.5％和91.5％,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).伴淋巴结转移的食管癌原发灶最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)为( 14.899±3.770),而无淋巴结转移者为(9.427±2.854).结论 18F-FDGPET/CT术前诊断食管癌淋巴结转移及确定N分期优于CT;食管癌原发灶SUVmax在一定程度上可以反映淋巴结转移情况.     

Preoperative assessment of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose using a dual-head coincidence camera: a pilot study.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether in patients with head and neck cancer, staging is possible with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) using a dual-head positron emission tomography (PET) camera. Twenty patients (ten men, ten women; mean age: 60 years) were studied using 185 MBq (5 mCi) 18F-FDG. Two of these patients who were suspected of having recurrence in the neck were restaged 19 and 12 months, respectively, after the resection of the primary tumour. The images were visually analyzed and the results were correlated with computed tomography (CT) (n = 18), ultrasonography (n = 17) and pathological findings. With respect to the primary tumour, FDG dual-head PET and CT revealed a sensitivity of 100% and 59%, respectively (P < 0.001). In seven patients lymph node metastases were found in the neck specimen. Two of them had bilateral metastases. FDG dual-head PET correctly identified all nine pathological neck sides whereas CT and ultrasonography depicted eight of nine and seven of eight pathological sides, respectively. In three patients, false-positive FDG uptake was seen, which was due to a preceding biopsy in two cases. The sensitivity of FDG dual-head PET, CT and ultrasonography in the identification of pathological neck sides was 100%, 89% and 87%, respectively, and the specificity was 90%, 93% and 50%, respectively. With knowledge of the preceding biopsies, the specificity of FDG dual-head PET would have been 97%. The smallest lymph node metastasis detected by FDG dual-head PET that was missed by CT had a diameter of 0.6 cm. Measurement of 18F-FDG with a dual-head PET camera is very sensitive in the detection of primary head and neck cancers and accurate in the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastases. The results justify a prospective study on the identification of metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. In addition, it is justified to start a study on the detection of unknown primary tumours in patients with cervical metastases.     

Routine (18)F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making.

The preoperative staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) with (18)F-FDG PET is not as yet generally considered to be evidence based. We have found only 1 study that evaluated (18)F-FDG PET in a nonselected population with proven CRC. Several other studies have concentrated on more advanced disease. The aim of this study was to assess the potential clinical benefit of (18)F-FDG PET in the routine staging of CRC. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients who had had CRC histologically proven by colonoscopy underwent prospective preoperative staging by plain chest radiography, sonography, CT, and (18)F-FDG PET. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were retrospectively assessed by comparison with the histologic results after surgery (36 patients) or clinical follow-up (2 inoperable cases-both patients died within 1 y of the PET examination). The impact of (18)F-FDG PET on therapeutic decision making was evaluated by comparing medical records before and after (18)F-FDG PET. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET correctly detected 95% of primary tumors, whereas CT and sonography correctly detected only 49% and 14%, respectively. Lymph nodes were involved in 7 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET were 29%, 88%, and 75%, respectively. CT and sonography did not reveal any lymph node involvement. Liver metastases were present in 9 patients. (18)F-FDG PET, CT, and sonography had a sensitivity of 78%, 67%, and 25%, respectively; a specificity of 96%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; and an accuracy of 91%, 91%, and 81%, respectively. (18)F-FDG PET revealed further lesions in 11 patients. Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 tumor markers were elevated in, respectively, only 33% and 8% of cases of proven CRC. (18)F-FDG PET changed the treatment modality for 8% and the range of surgery for 13% of patients. In total, (18)F-FDG PET changed the method of treatment for 16% of patients. CONCLUSION: Plain chest radiography and sonography did not bring any clinical benefits. No correlation was found between the level of tumor markers and the stage of disease. CT is necessary for confirmation of PET findings at extraabdominal sites (PET-guided CT) and for their morphologic specification at abdominal and pelvic sites before an operation. (18)F-FDG PET is the best method for the staging of CRC in all localities, despite the high rate of false-negative PET findings in patients with lymph node involvement. PET should be performed as a first examination after verification of CRC. We propose a PET/CT hybrid system as optimal in the staging of CRC.     

Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and staging of primary and recurrent malignant head and neck tumours in comparison with conventional imaging methods [including ultrasonography, radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], physical examination, panendoscopy and biopsies in clinical routine. A total of 54 patients (13 female, 41 male, age 61.3ᆠ years) were investigated retrospectively. Three groups were formed. In group I, ¹⁸F-FDG PET was performed in 15 patients to detect unknown primary cancers. In group II, 24 studies were obtained for preoperative staging of proven head and neck cancer. In group III, ¹⁸F-FDG PET was used in 15 patients to monitor tumour recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. In all patients, imaging was obtained at 70 min after the intravenous administration of 180 MBq ¹⁸F-FDG. In 11 of the 15 patients in group I, the primary cancer could be found with ¹⁸F-FDG, yielding a detection rate of 73.3%. In 4 of the 15 patients, CT findings were also suggestive of the primary cancer but were nonetheless equivocal. In these patients, ¹⁸F-FDG showed increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by the primary tumour, which was confirmed by histology. One patient had recurrence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with ¹⁸F-FDG PET, but was detected by CT. In three cases, the primary cancer could not be found with any imaging method. Among the 24 patients in group II investigated for staging purposes, ¹⁸F-FDG PET detected a total of 13 local and three distant lymph node metastases, whereas the conventional imaging methods detected only nine local and one distant lymph node metastases. The results of ¹⁸F-FDG PET led to an upstaging in 5/24 (20.8%) patients. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in 5/24 (20.8%). There was one false positive result using ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Among the 15 patients of group III with suspected recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, ¹⁸F-FDG was true positive in 7/15 (46.6%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). The conventional imaging methods were true positive in 5/15 (33.3%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). One false negative (6.6%) and three false positive findings (20%) on ¹⁸F-FDG PET were due to inflamed tissue. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in three (20%) and false negative in three cases (20%). It is concluded that in comparison to conventional diagnostic methods, ¹⁸F-FDG PET provides additional and clinically relevant information in the detection of primary and metastatic carcinomas as well as in the early detection of recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. ¹⁸F-FDG PET should therefore be performed early in clinical routine, usually before CT or MRI.     

Staging of recurrent and advanced lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET in a coincidence technique (hybrid PET)

The aim of this study was to evaluate [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ( F-FDG) imaging of recurrent or inoperable lung cancer using a hybrid positron emission tomography (PET) device of the third generation. Examinations were compared with the results of conventional staging. Thirty-six patients suffering from recurrent or primarily inoperable lung cancer (29 men, seven women; age 64.8+/-12.0 years) were examined using hybrid PET (Marconi Axis gamma-PET ) 60 min after injection of 370 MBq F-FDG. The data obtained were reconstructed iteratively. All patients received a computed tomography (CT) scan using either the spiral or multislice technique. All lesions suspicious for primary or recurrent tumour were verified by biopsy; mediastinal lymph nodes were considered as malignant, when positive histology or a small axis diameter of greater than 1 cm measured with CT in addition to progression of clinical course was found. Distant metastases were diagnosed by CT and bone scintigraphy. Using hybrid PET all lesions showed a focally elevated glucose metabolism. Lymph node involvement of the ipsilateral peribronchial and hilar station (N1) was identified in 24/26 cases (92%), in 26/29 cases (90%) of ipsilateral central manifestation (N2) and in 11/13 (85%) cases of central contralateral or supraclavicular lymphatic infestation (N3). Pulmonary spread in hybrid PET was found in 4/8 cases (50%), whereas mainly lung metastases with a diameter of 1.5 cm and smaller were missed. Pleural involvement diagnosed by CT was verified in 4/5 patients. All four patients with bony metastases in conventional staging also presented with positive findings in hybrid PET (8/9 lesions). Concordance with conventional staging was found in 28/36 of patients (78%). In 4/36 patients (11%) unknown sites of tumour were detected leading to therapeutic consequences in three patients after radiological confirmation. Hybrid PET would have led to an understaging in four cases (11%), resulting theoretically in inefficient treatment in two patients. Hybrid PET for F-FDG imaging in the staging of recurrent or primarily inoperable lung cancer supplied equal (78%) or more information (11%) compared to conventional staging procedures. Using the information of hybrid PET alone, 11% of the patients would have been understaged. We conclude that hybrid PET has the potential for use as an additional staging tool in this subgroup of patients, providing supplementary information compared to conventional staging modalities.     

Preoperative assessment of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose using a dual-head coincidence camera: a pilot study

The aim of this study was to investigate whether in patients with head and neck cancer, staging is possible with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) using a dual-head positron emission tomography (PET) camera. Twenty patients (ten men, ten women; mean age: 60 years) were studied using 185 MBq (5 mCi) ¹⁸F-FDG. Two of these patients who were suspected of having recurrence in the neck were restaged 19 and 12 months, respectively, after the resection of the primary tumour. The images were visually analyzed and the results were correlated with computed tomography (CT) (n = 18), ultrasonography (n = 17) and pathological findings. With respect to the primary tumour, FDG dual-head PET and CT revealed a sensitivity of 100% and 59%, respectively (P<0.001). In seven patients lymph node metastases were found in the neck specimen. Two of them had bilateral metastases. FDG dual-head PET correctly identified all nine pathological neck sides whereas CT and ultrasonography depicted eight of nine and seven of eight pathological sides, respectively. In three patients, false-positive FDG uptake was seen, which was due to a preceding biopsy in two cases. The sensitivity of FDG dual-head PET, CT and ultrasonography in the identification of pathological neck sides was 100%, 89% and 87%, respectively, and the specificity was 90%, 93% and 50%, respectively. With knowledge of the preceding biopsies, the specificity of FDG dual-head PET would have been 97%. The smallest lymph node metastasis detected by FDG dual-head PET that was missed by CT had a diameter of 0.6 cm. Measurement of ¹⁸F-FDG with a dual-head PET camera is very sensitive in the detection of primary head and neck cancers and accurate in the preoperative assessment of lymph node metastases. The results justify a prospective study on the identification of metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. In addition, it is justified to start a study on the detection of unknown primary tumours in patients with cervical metastases. Received 19 October and in revised form 18 December 1998     

PET应用于胃癌病情评估的可行性研究

目的 探讨PET显像在胃癌病情评估中的作用。方法 将23例胃癌患者术前PET全身显像结果与手术探查、活检或胃镜检查明确的肿瘤分型、分期、转移等情况进行对照。结果 PET对胃癌原发灶的诊断准确率达87.0%。以半定量指标SUVmean和SUVmax大于2．5为诊断标准,本组PET诊断准确率分别为86．2％(19／23)和91．3％(21／23)。对淋巴结转移检测准确率为78．9%(15／19),对远处转移病灶诊断准确率为7／8。结论 PET对胃恶性肿瘤原发灶和远处转移病灶检测较为敏感,为胃癌诊断、手术方法和治疗原则的选择提供了有价值的参考依据。     

Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer

Objective

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent cancer occurring in the female genital tract in the Western countries. Because surgical staging is currently the standard, noninvasive techniques that accurately identify lymph node (LN) metastases would be beneficial by reducing costs and complications. The purpose of our study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting LN metastases in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.

Methods

Two hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients with endometrial cancer underwent preoperative PET/CT and MRI for staging. The malignancy criteria for LNs were a short diameter of 1 cm or more by MRI and focally increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by PET/CT. After evaluating PET/CT and MRI separately, morphologic and functional image findings were compared with the histological findings regarding LN metastasis for all patients. PET/CT and MRI images were classified on the basis of histological findings as true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, or false-negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated.

Results

Histologic examination revealed LN metastases in 51 patients (17.8 %). The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the primary lesions by PET/CT ranged from 1.4 to 37.7, with a mean value of 9.3, whereas those of the metastatic LNs ranged from 2.0 to 22.5 with a mean of 7.3. On a per-patient basis, node staging resulted in sensitivities of 70.0 % with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and 34.0 % with MRI, and specificities of 95.4 % with PET/CT and 95.0 % with MRI. The NPV of PET/CT was 94.3 %, and that of MRI was 87.2 %. On a lesion base analysis, sensitivity of PET/CT was 79.4 % while that of MRI was 51.6 %. In detecting distant metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of PET/CT were 92.9, 98.9, 98.6, 81.3, and 99.6 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT was better than MRI for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer both by patient basis and lesion basis analyses. Due to high NPV, FDG PET-CT could aid in selecting candidates for lymphadenectomy.