Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial

INTRODUCTION: Atrial pacing locations that decrease atrial activation and recovery time may be preferable in patients with a history of atrial arrhythmias. This multicenter prospective randomized study compared the efficacy of Bachmann's bundle (BB) region pacing to right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing in patients with recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with standard pacing indications (n = 120, 70+/-11 years) were randomized to atrial pacing in either the RAA (n = 57) or BB region (n = 63). Implantation time was similar between groups (88+/-36 min [n = 38] for BB vs 83+/-34 min [n = 34] for RAA). No differences in pacing threshold, impedance, or sensing between BB and RAA groups were observed at implantation or after the 6-week, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up periods. Average length of follow-up was 12.6+/-7.4 months for the BB group and 11.8+/-8.0 months for the RAA pacing group. The percentage of atrial pacing was similar between groups (61%+/-34% RAA vs 65%+/-31% BB at 2 weeks after implant). BB atrial pacing significantly (P < 0.05) shortened p wave duration compared with sinus rhythm (123+/-21 msec vs 132+/-21 msec, n = 50) 2 weeks after implant. In contrast, p wave duration was longer during atrial pacing from the RAA position compared with sinus rhythm (148+/-23 msec vs 123+/-23 msec, n = 37). Additionally, p wave duration was shorter during BB pacing than during RAA pacing. Patients with BB pacing had a higher (P < 0.05) rate of survival free from chronic AF (75%) compared with patients with RAA pacing (47%) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: BB region pacing is safe and effective for attenuating the progression of AF.     

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation during atrioventricular pacing with varying intervals: role of atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving VVI pacemakers have a higher incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) than those receiving DDD pacemakers. However, the mechanism behind the difference is not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system play a role in the occurrence of AF during AV pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 28 patients who had (group I, n = 15) or did not have (group II, n = 13) AF induced by a single extrastimulus during pacing with different AV intervals. Atrial pressure, atrial size, atrial effective refractory periods, and atrial dispersion were evaluated during pacing with different AV intervals. Twenty-four-hour heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity also were examined. Atrial pressure, atrial size, effective refractory periods in the right posterolateral atrium and distal coronary sinus, and atrial dispersion increased as the AV interval shortened from 160 to 0 msec. During AV pacing, group I patients had greater minimal (52+/-17 vs 25+/-7 msec; P < 0.005) and maximal (76+/-16 vs 36+/-9 msec; P < 0.005) atrial dispersion than group II patients. The differences in atrial size and atrial dispersion among different AV intervals were greater in patients with AF than in those without AF. Baroreflex sensitivity (6.6+/-1.7 vs 3.9+/-1.0; P < 0.00005), but not heart rate variability, was higher in patients with AF than in those without AF. CONCLUSION: Abnormal atrial electrophysiology and higher vagal reflex activity can play important roles in the genesis of AF in patients receiving pacemakers.     

Reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: In animals, atrial fibrillation results in reversible atrial electrical remodeling manifested as shortening of the atrial effective refractory period, slowing of intra-atrial conduction, and prolongation of sinus node recovery time. There is limited information on changes in these parameters after cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients who had been in atrial fibrillation for 1 to 12 months underwent electrophysiologic testing 10 minutes and 1 hour after cardioversion. At 1 week, 19 patients still in sinus rhythm returned for repeat testing. Reverse remodeling of the effective refractory period was not uniform across the three atrial sites tested. At the lateral right atrium, there was a highly significant increase in the effective refractory period between 10 minutes and 1 hour after cardioversion (drive cycle length 400 ms: 204 +/- 17 ms vs 211 +/- 20 ms, drive cycle length 550 ms: 213 +/- 18 ms vs 219 +/- 23 ms, P < 0.001). The effective refractory period at the coronary sinus and distal coronary sinus did not change in the first hour but had increased by 1 week. The corrected sinus node recovery time did not change in the first hour but was shorter at 1 week (606 +/- 311 ms vs 408 +/- 160 ms, P = 0.009). P wave duration also was shorter at 1 week (135 +/- 18 ms vs 129 +/- 13 ms, P = 0.04) consistent with increasing atrial conduction velocity. CONCLUSION: The atrial effective refractory period increases, sinus node function improves, and atrial conduction velocity goes up in the first week after cardioversion of long-standing atrial fibrillation in humans. Reverse electrical remodeling of the effective refractory period occurs at different rates in different regions of the atrium.     

Electrophysiologic characteristics of the atrium in sinus node dysfunction: atrial refractoriness and conduction

INTRODUCTION: Clinical electrophysiology (EP) has focused attention on the EP properties of atrial muscle in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) sometimes are included in these studies, but the characteristics of these patients with SND alone appear less well investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed EP data of 46 patients (mean age 70 +/- 8 years) with SND, who underwent EP study for evaluation of the atrial substrate. In 16 patients, a history of paroxysmal AF was documented, but not in the remaining 30 patients who had SND alone. We considered as control a group of 25 subjects (mean age 63 +/- 14 years), who were referred to our EP laboratory for unexplained syncope or AV conduction disturbances. Following pharmacologic washout and at a drive cycle of 600 msec, effective (ERP) and functional refractory periods (FRP), S1-A1 and S2-A2 latency, A1 and A2 width, latent vulnerability index (ERP/A2), and P wave duration on the surface ECG were measured. Intra-atrial conduction times were measured from the stimulus artifact by pacing the high right atrium (HRA), to the corresponding atriograms at the AV node (HRA-AVN), low lateral atrium (HRA-LLA), and low interatrial septum close to the coronary sinus ostium (HRA-CSO). Compared with the control group, SND patients did not show differences in ERP (238 +/- 26 msec vs 250 +/- 29 msec), FRP (274 +/- 25 msec vs 280 +/- 32 msec), S1-A1 (38 +/- 15 msec vs 33 +/- 11 msec) and S2-A2 latency (67 +/- 24 msec vs 63 +/- 25 msec), or HRA-AVN (81 +/- 24 msec vs 65 +/- 19 msec), HRA-LLA (36 +/- 30 msec vs 40 +/- 27 msec), and HRA-CSO (77 +/- 17 msec vs 80 +/- 15 msec) conduction times. In contrast, we observed strong differences in atriogram durations A1 (59 +/- 19 msec vs 39 +/- 13 msec; P < 0.001) and A2 (92 +/- 28 msec vs 57 +/- 18 msec; P < 0.001), as well as in the latent vulnerability index ERP/A2 (2.8 +/- 1.2 msec vs 4.8 +/- 1.7; P < 0.001). Also, the P wave was slightly longer (104 +/- 18 msec vs 94 +/- 45 msec; P < 0.05). No significant statistical difference in EP parameters was found between SND patients with or without documented AF. CONCLUSION: In patients with SND, atrial refractoriness appears similar to that of control subjects. The most important EP abnormality appears to be local conduction slowing disturbances, with prolonged basal and postextrastimuli atriograms, responsible for a lower vulnerability index. This could explain, at least in part, the tendency of patients with SND to develop AF during their natural history. Normality of atrial refractoriness, in contrast to atrial conduction disorders, might explain why atrial pacing shows a preventative effect on the development of AF and why antiarrhythmic drugs often are ineffective.     

Atrial pacing for suppression of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of atrial pacing in the suppression of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion. METHODS AND RESULTS: The efficacy of atrial pacing in suppressing early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation was studied in 12 of 45 (29%) patients with early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion. These patients were randomized to undergo either repeated defibrillation alone or repeated defibrillation followed by high right atrial pacing at 500 ms in a crossover fashion. In patients with persistent early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation despite atrial pacing at 500 ms and repeated defibrillation, atrial pacing at 300 ms was tested. Lastly, if early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation persisted, administration of intravenous sotalol (1.5 mg. kg(-1)) was tested. Atrial pacing at 500 ms after defibrillation prevented early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation in five of 12 (42%) patients, and was significantly more effective than repeated defibrillation (0/9 patients, 0%, P<0.05). During atrial pacing at 500 ms, the density of atrial premature depolarizations (APDs) was significantly decreased (2.4+/-2.4 APDs. min(-1)vs 16.4+/-9.8 APDs. min(-1), P<0. 05) and the coupling interval of atrial premature depolarization was significantly increased (420+/-32 ms vs 398+/-19 ms, P<0.05) as compared to no pacing. In the remaining seven (58%) patients, atrial pacing at 500 ms failed to prevent early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation, but significantly decreased the density of atrial premature depolarization (3.4+/-2.4 APDs. min(-1)vs 14.2+/-4.8 APDs. min(-1), P<0.05) and delayed the onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (33+/-17s vs 11+/-11 s, P<0.05). Atrial pacing at 300 ms decreased the coupling interval of atrial premature depolarization as compared to no pacing and during atrial pacing at 500 ms (P<0.05), but without early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation suppression. Administration of intravenous sotalol was effective in preventing early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation in five of seven (71%) patients where pacing failed to suppress early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that atrial pacing can be useful when combined with transvenous defibrillation in patients with early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation.     

Effects of simultaneous atrioventricular pacing on atrial refractoriness and atrial fibrillation inducibility: role of atrial mechanoelectrical feedback

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an acute increase in atrial pressure on refractoriness (mechanoelectrical feedback) and the vulnerability to atrial fibrillation (AF) and to investigate the effects of autonomic blockade and verapamil on mechanoelectrical feedback in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Right atrial pressure and effective refractory period (ERP) at the right atrial appendage (RAA) and high right atrial septum were measured during sinus rhythm, and during atrial and simultaneous AV pacing at a cycle length of 300 msec, either in the absence (n = 25) or presence (n = 22) of pharmacologic autonomic blockade. In another 15 patients, the protocol was performed before and after infusion of verapamil 0.15 mg/kg. In the absence of autonomic blockade, AV pacing resulted in a higher mean right atrial pressure (11.7 +/- 3.3 vs 4.3 +/- 3.0 mmHg, P < 0.001) and a shorter atrial RAA ERP (144 +/- 23 msec vs 161 +/- 21 msec; P < 0.001) compared with atrial pacing; AF was induced more often during AV pacing (87%) than during atrial pacing (20%) and was related directly to the right atrial pressure (r = 0.39, P = 0.004) and indirectly to the RAA ERP (r = -0.42, P < 0.001). The susceptibility to sustained AF was greatly enhanced by autonomic blockade. Verapamil markedly attenuated the shortening of ERP and the propensity for AF that occurred during simultaneous AV pacing. CONCLUSION: An acute increase in atrial pressure during tachycardia is associated with shortening of atrial refractoriness and a propensity for AF, i.e., atrial mechanoelectrical feedback, which may be enhanced by autonomic blockade and attenuated by calcium channel blockade.     

Efficacy and tolerability of continuous overdrive atrial pacing in atrial fibrillation.

Overdrive right atrial pacing has been used to prevent atrial fibrillation, but its efficacy in atrial fibrillation prevention and the patient tolerability and quality of life during high rate pacing remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to test the effects of a consistent atrial pacing algorithm that automatically paced the atrium at 30 ms shorter than the sinus P-P interval for atrial fibrillation prevention. Fifteen patients with sick sinus syndrome implanted with a Thera DR (model 7940 or 7960, Medtronic Inc.) were randomly programmed to rate adaptive dual chamber pacing (DDDR) or DDDR + consistent atrial pacing mode, each for an 8-week study period. The efficacy of consistent atrial pacing was assessed by the number of automatic mode switching and the number of premature atrial complexes. Symptoms and quality of life were assessed by the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire and an atrial fibrillation symptom checklist. The percentage of atrial pacing increased from 57 +/- 32% to 86 +/- 28%. Overall, there was no significant difference in the number of automatic mode switching episodes between DDDR and DDDR + consistent atrial pacing (47 +/- 90 vs 42 +/- 87, P > 0.05), but a significant reduction in premature atrial complexes by 74.7% (P < 0.001). There was no undue increase in atrial rate by the DDDR + consistent atrial pacing mode versus DDDR (63 +/- 13 vs 70 +/- 7 bpm). There was no significant difference in quality of life scores and symptom severity on frequency between the two modes of pacing, but a trend towards a lower frequency of symptoms in the DDDR + consistent atrial pacing mode compared with baseline (29.5 +/- 10.2 vs 25.1 +/- 9.7, P = 0.07). An algorithm that provides consistent atrial overdrive pacing can suppress atrial fibrillation triggering premature atrial complexes without the need to increase the overall atrial rate compared with conventional pacing. The algorithm appears to be well-tolerated, but further studies are needed to address the clinical impact of this atrial fibrillation prevention algorithm.     

Role of dispersion of atrial refractoriness in the recurrence of clinical atrial fibrillation; a manifestation of atrial electrical remodelling in humans?

AIMS: The mechanism of atrial fibrillation recurrence following cardioversion is unknown, although experimental studies have indicated that changes in dispersion of atrial refractoriness may play a role. The aims of this study were to assess (1) if dispersion of atrial refractoriness is relevant to atrial fibrillation recurrence and (2) if dispersion of refractoriness is part of the atrial electrical remodelling process in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients underwent internal cardioversion (CV1) of persistent atrial fibrillation. Patients were monitored by daily transtelephonic recordings following discharge and if there was spontaneous atrial fibrillation recurrence they were rapidly admitted for repeat cardioversion (CV2). We used the 5th percentile of 100 consecutive atrial fibrillation cycle lengths (AFCL(P5)) and the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) as measures of atrial refractoriness at four different atrial sites. Dispersion of AFCL(P5)at CV1 was significantly higher in those who had subsequent recurrence of atrial fibrillation than in those who remained in sinus rhythm for at least 1 month after cardioversion (35+/-17 ms vs 9+/-13 ms;P<0.02). Dispersion of AFCL(P5)measured at CV2 was significantly lower than that measured in the same patients at CV1 (19+/-8 ms vs 35+/-11 ms;P=0.02). i.e. dispersion of AFCL(P5)had reduced following a period of sinus rhythm. In contrast, there was no difference in dispersion of AERP between the recurrers and non-recurrers. Dispersion of AERP between CV1 and CV2 did not change following a period of sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: Dispersion of AFCL is relevant to atrial fibrillation recurrence and may represent a manifestation of atrial electrical remodelling in humans. Treatment directed at AFCL dispersion may be useful in the suppression of atrial fibrillation recurrence following cardioversion.     

Effect of gender on atrial electrophysiologic changes induced by rapid atrial pacing and elevation of atrial pressure

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of atrial fibrillation is greater in men than in women, but the reasons for this gender difference are unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of gender on the atrial electrophysiologic effects of rapid atrial pacing and an increase in atrial pressure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Right atrial pressure and effective refractory period (ERP) were measured during sinus rhythm and during atrial and simultaneous AV pacing at a cycle length of 300 msec in 10 premenopausal women, 11 postmenopausal women, and 24 men. The postmenopausal women were significantly older than the premenopausal women (61 +/- 8 years vs 34 +/- 10 years; P < 0.01). During sinus rhythm, mean atrial ERP in premenopausal women was shorter (211 +/- 19 msec) than in postmenopausal women and age-matched men (242 +/- 18 msec and 246 +/- 34 msec, respectively; P < 0.05). Atrial ERPs in all patients shortened significantly during atrial and simultaneous AV pacing. However, the degree of shortening during atrial pacing (43 +/- 8 msec vs 70 +/- 20 msec and 74 +/- 21 msec; P < 0.05) and during simultaneous AV pacing (48 +/- 16 msec vs 91 +/- 27 msec and 84 +/- 26 msec; P < 0.05) was significantly less in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women or age-matched men. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate a significant gender difference in atrial electrophysiologic changes in response to rapid atrial pacing and an increase in atrial pressure. The effect of menopause on the observed changes suggests that the gender differences may be mediated by the effects of estrogen on atrial electrophysiologic properties.     

Recovery of electrophysiological parameters after conversion of atrial fibrillation.

We investigated the recovery of electrophysiological parameters from electrical remodeling after conversion of chronic lone atrial fibrillation in humans. Clinical studies have shown that the longer atrial fibrillation lasts, the more difficult it becomes to maintain the sinus rhythm after cardioversion. To explore the effects of the duration of atrial fibrillation on changes of electrophysiological parameters after conversion, we determined the atrial effective refractory period and P wave duration during right atrial pacing at 1 and 24 h after electrical cardioversion in 15 patients with chronic lone atrial fibrillation (median duration, 6 months). By 24 h after cardioversion, the effective refractory period at a pacing cycle length of 600 ms increased from 225+/-19 to 254+/-27 ms. However, the P wave duration did not decrease significantly 24 h after conversion. As the duration of atrial fibrillation became longer, the prolongation of effective refractory period was more delayed (P<0. 001, r=0.82), and the shortening of P wave duration was significantly smaller within 24 h after cardioversion (P<0. 001, r=0.67). After cardioversion of chronic lone atrial fibrillation, the recovery of shortened atrial refractoriness and prolonged intraatrial conduction time is dependent on the duration of preexisting atrial fibrillation.     

Alterations in atrial electrophysiology associated with chronic atrial fibrillation in man.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the changes in atrial electrophysiology associated with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation in man. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atrial monophasic action potential duration at 90% repolarization and the effective refractory period were measured in 13 patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation after low-energy endocardial cardioversion, and compared to eight controls without a history of atrial fibrillation. Measurements were made at the right atrial appendage and midlateral right atrial wall at basic, 600 ms and 400 ms drive cycle lengths. In control patients, the effective refractory periods were significantly longer at the atrial appendage than the lateral wall at 600 ms (right atrial appendage 265 ms, midlateral right atrial wall 228 ms, P<0.05), and 400 ms cycle lengths (right atrial appendage 270 ms, midlateral right atrial wall 218 ms, P<0.05), but this was not evident in patients with atrial fibrillation. The monophasic action potentials and effective refractory periods at both atrial sites were shorter in the atrial fibrillation patients compared to controls; however, only the effective refractory periods at atrial appendage at 600 ms (atrial fibrillation 210 ms, controls 265 ms, P<0.001), and 400 ms cycle lengths (atrial fibrillation 200 ms, controls 270 ms, P>0.001) reached statistical significance. Effective refractory period dispersion was significantly greater in controls than in patients with atrial fibrillation (cycle length 600 ms: controls 36, atrial fibrillation 13, P=0.01; cycle length 400 ms: controls 54, atrial fibrillation 18, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without a history of atrial fibrillation, the refractory period at the right atrial appendage is significantly longer than at the midlateral right atrial wall. This 'normal' pattern of atrial refractory dispersion is lost in patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation, with marked shortening of the effective refractory period at the right atrial appendage. This may explain the high risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation following successful electrical cardioversion.     

Effect of Bachmann's bundle pacing on atrial fibrillation: electrophysiologic assessment

BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that simultaneous multisite atrial pacing, Bachmann's bundle (BB) pacing, and coronary sinus (CS) pacing are useful for preventing the induction of atrial fibrillation (AF). HYPOTHESIS: We investigated whether a simple pacing approach via BB could reduce the induction of AF by extrastimuli (S2) from the right atrial appendage (RAA). METHODS: Programmed electrical stimulation was performed from the RAA and the area of BB at the superior aspect of the atrial septum, and bipolar recordings were obtained from the RAA, BB, and CS in 14 patients. RESULTS: In five patients, AF was induced with critically timed RAA-S2 delivered during RAA pacing. However, AF was not induced in any patient when RAA-S2 was delivered during BB pacing. The duration of the P wave during BB pacing was significantly shorter than that during RAA pacing and sinus rhythm (BB 80 +/- 16 ms vs. RAA 106 +/- 36 ms vs. sinus rhythm 100 +/- 24 ms, p < 0.05). The intra-atrial conduction time to the distal coronary sinus (CSd) caused by early S2 at the RAA was significantly reduced by BB pacing (BB 114 +/- 22 ms vs. RAA 157 +/- 35 ms, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Bachmann's bundle pacing reduces atrial conduction time caused by RAA-S2 and may be useful for preventing the induction of AF.     

The Spatial Dispersion of Atrial Refractoriness and Atrial Fibrillation Vulnerability

The local dispersion of conduction and refractoriness has been considered essential for induction of atrial arrhythmias. This study sought to determine whether a difference of refractoriness and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation between trabeculated and smooth as well as high and low right atrium may contribute to initiation of atrial fibrillation in dogs.In 14 healthy mongrel dogs weighing 22.4 ± 1 kg, closed-chest endocardial programmed stimulation was performed from four distinct right atrial sites. Atrial refractory periods and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation or premature atrial complexes were determined during a basic cycle length of 400 and 300 ms and an increasing pacing current strength.For a pacing cycle length of 300ms, atrial refractory periods were longer on the smooth, as compared to the trabeculated right atrium (102 ± 25 vs. 97 ± 17ms, p < 0.05), whereas for a pacing cycle length of 400ms, there was no significant difference. The duration of the vulnerability zone for induction of atrial fibrillation was longer on the smooth right atrium, for a cycle length of both 400 ms (40 ± 30 vs. 31 ± 22 ms; p < 0.05) and 300 ms (33 ± 25 vs. 23 ± 21 ms; p < 0.01). When comparing high and low right atrium, refractory periods were longer on the the low right atrium, for a cycle length of both 400 ms (111 ± 23 vs. 94 ± 24ms; p < 0.01) and 300 ms (104 ± 20 vs. 96 ± 23ms; p < 0.01). For a pacing cycle length of 300 ms, the duration of the atrial fibrillation vulnerability zone was longer for the high, as compared to the low right atrium (34 ± 22 vs. 22 ± 22, p < 0.01). Seven dogs with easily inducible episodes of atrial fibrillation demonstrated significantly shorter refractory periods as compared to 7 non-vulnerable dogs, regardless of pacing site and current strength.In conclusion, significant differences in refractoriness and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation can be observed in the area of the crista terminalis in healthy dogs. Thus, local anatomic factors may play a role in the initiation of atrial fibrillation.     

Verapamil prevents stretch-induced shortening of atrial effective refractory period in langendorff-perfused rabbit heart

INTRODUCTION: Atrial dilation and rapid pacing reduce atrial effective refractory periods (AERPs), thereby increasing the susceptibility to sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. It is unclear whether similar pathophysiologic mechanisms are operative in short-term electrophysiologic changes caused by dilation and rapid pacing. Therefore, we analyzed whether both forms of short-term electrophysiologic changes are similarly affected by pharmacologic interventions acting on different potential mechanisms underlying these changes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts underwent a protocol with stepwise increase of intra-atrial pressure from 0 to 12 cm H2O followed by 10 minutes of rapid pacing at 4 cm H2O. The protocol was repeated after addition of glibenclamide (10 micromol/L, n = 7), cariporide (1 micromol/L, n = 7), or verapamil (1 micromol/L, n = 9). In the basal state, increase of intra-atrial pressure from 0 to 12 cm H2O decreased AERPs from 85 +/- 11 to 55 +/- 9 msec (P < 0.01), rapid pacing at low intra-atrial pressure (4 cmH2O) decreased AERP to a similar extent, from 81 +/- 11 to 60 +/- 10 (P < 0.01). At higher intra-atrial pressure, decrease of AERP was more pronounced (10 cm H2O: 37 +/- 2 msec) (n = 7). Addition of verapamil decreased basal AERP from 86 +/- 10 msec to 68 +/- 11 msec (P < 0.05). Short-term electrophysiologic changes due to atrial dilation were abolished; changes due to rapid pacing were reduced but still present. Glibenclamide and cariporide had no significant effect. CONCLUSION: Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart is a suitable model for studying short-term electrophysiologic changes due to both rapid pacing and atrial dilation. AERPs are shortened to a similar extent by both mechanisms, whereas a combination of the two leads to more pronounced AERP reduction. Calcium overload plays a crucial role in short-term electrophysiologic changes caused by atrial dilation, whereas atrial ischemia or acidosis has no significant impact.     

Antiarrhythmic effects of JTV-519, a novel cardioprotective drug,on atrial fibrillation/flutter in a canine sterile pericarditis model

Effect of JTV-519 on AF. INTRODUCTION: A new cardioprotective drug, JTV-519, blocks Na+ current and inwardly rectifying K+ current and inhibits Ca2+ current. However, its role in atrial electrophysiology is unknown. We investigated the antiarrhythmic effects of JTV-519 on atrial fibrillation/flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. METHODS AND RESULTS: In nine dogs with sterile pericarditis, 38 episodes of sustained (>30 sec) atrial fibrillation (8 dogs) and 24 episodes of sustained atrial flutter (7 dogs) were induced by rapid atrial pacing. When atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter was sustained >15 minutes, it was cardioverted and reinduced. The inducibility of atrial fibrillation/flutter, the atrial effective refractory period, and the intra-atrial conduction time were compared before and after the continuous infusion of JTV-519 (0.03 mg/kg/min). JTV-519 significantly decreased the mean number of sustained atrial fibrillation episodes (from 4.2 +/- 2.9 to 0 +/- 0, P < 0.01). In contrast, atrial flutter was still inducible in 4 dogs after JTV-519 (from 2.7 +/- 2.5 to 1.6 +/- 2.1, P = NS). JTV-519 significantly prolonged effective refractory period (from 123 +/- 18 to 143 +/- 14 msec, from 127 +/- 18 to 151 +/- 12 msec, and from 132 +/- 13 to 159 +/- 9 msec at basic cycle lengths of 200, 300, and 400 msec, respectively, P < 0.01), but it did not affect the intra-atrial conduction time (from 47 +/- 11 msec to 48 +/- 11 msec, P = NS). CONCLUSION: JTV-519 had significant protective effects on atrial fibrillation in the canine sterile pericarditis model, mainly by increasing effective refractory period, suggesting that it may have potential as a novel antiarrhythmic agent for atrial fibrillation.     

Pre-excited RR intervals during atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: influence of the atrioventricular node refractory period

The ventricular rate and percent of pre-excited QRS complexes during atrial fibrillation were compared in two groups of patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Group A consisted of 22 patients whose anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway was longer than that of the atrioventricular (AV) node. Group B consisted of 23 patients in whom this relation was reversed. No patient had organic heart disease. Both groups had a similar effective refractory period of the accessory pathway (288 +/- 37 vs. 280 +/- 26 ms), whereas that of the AV node was shorter in group A than group B (242 +/- 25 vs. 285 +/- 27 ms, p = 0.0001). Patients in group A had a lower percent of pre-excited QRS complexes during atrial fibrillation (39 +/- 43% vs. 93 +/- 20%, p = 0.0001). In the 21 patients whose refractory period was measured, the difference was plotted against the percent of pre-excited QRS complexes; there was a significant correlation between the two (r = -0.83, p less than 0.001). In patients in whom pre-excited RR intervals were present, the pre-excited RR intervals were compared between the two groups. Both groups had similar effective refractory periods of the accessory pathway (265 +/- 22 vs. 280 +/- 27 ms) and ventricle (200 +/- 17 vs. 211 +/- 26 ms). The effective refractory period of the AV node was shorter in group A (248 +/- 22 vs. 285 +/- 28 ms, p = 0.0005). The shortest pre-excited RR interval did not show any difference (244 +/- 37 vs. 265 +/- 41 ms). However, both the average (328 +/- 39 vs. 397 +/- 56 ms, p = 0.001) and longest (495 +/- 109 vs. 666 +/- 205 ms, p = 0.02) pre-excited RR intervals were shorter in group A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

快速起搏左房后部分心房电生理参数的变化

目的探讨采用快速起搏左房构建心房颤动(简称房颤)模型的可行性以及快速起搏心房后心房部分电生理特性的变化。方法新西兰兔,分为假手术组(n=11只)和起搏组(n=15只),起搏组中成功诱发房颤的动物为房颤亚组,不能诱发房颤的为非房颤亚组。起搏组以1 500次/分持续起搏左房8周。描记起搏前;起搏2,4,6,8周后体表心电图,测量相应时间点P波时限,予基础心率周期-程序刺激(S1-S2)刺激,检测左房有效不应期(AERP)。结果起搏8周后起搏组成功诱发房颤7只,其中房颤持续时间最长为24 h、最短为6.5 h。起搏8周P波时限较基础值延长(P=0.015)。起搏2,4,6,8周后,AERP较基础值缩短(P<0.05),并随着起搏时间的延长,AERP进行性缩短(P<0.05);起搏组中房颤亚组在起搏4,6,8周后P波时限延长较非房颤亚组明显(P<0.05),起搏8周后左房AERP缩短较非房颤亚组明显(P<0.05)。结论持续快速起搏左房是构建房颤模型的有效方法。快速起搏左房导致P波时限延长,AERP缩短。     

Effect of phenylephrine infusion on atrial electrophysiological properties.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of changes in autonomic tone induced by phenylephrine infusion on atrial refractoriness and conduction. DESIGN: Left and right atrial electrophysiological properties were measured before and after a constant phenylephrine infusion designed to increase sinus cycle length by 25%. SUBJECTS: 20 patients, aged 53 (SD 6) years, undergoing electrophysiological study for investigation of idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (seven patients) or for routine follow up after successful catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (13 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in left and right atrial effective refractory periods, atrial activation times, and frequency of induction of atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Phenylephrine (mean dose 69 (SD 18) mg/min) increased mean blood pressure by 22 (12) mm Hg (range 7 to 44) and lengthened sinus cycle length by 223 (94) ms (20 to 430). Left atrial effective refractory period lengthened following phenylephrine infusion from 250 (25) to 264 (21) ms (P < 0.001) but there was no significant change in right atrial effective refractory period: 200 (20) v 206 (29), P = 0.11. There was a significant relation between the effect of phenylephrine on sinus cycle length and on right atrial refractoriness (r = 0.6, P = 0.005) with shortening of right atrial refractoriness in patients with the greatest prolongation in sinus cycle length. During phenylephrine infusion, the right atrial stimulus to left atrial activation time at the basic pacing cycle length of 600 ms was unchanged, at 130 (18) v 131 (17) ms, but activation delay with a premature extrastimulus increased: 212 (28) v 227 (38) ms, P = 0.002. Atrial fibrillation was induced by two of 58 refractory period measurements at baseline and by 12 of 61 measurements during phenylephrine infusion (P < 0.01). Phenylephrine increased the difference between left and right atrial refractory periods by 22.8 (19.4) ms in the five patients with induced atrial fibrillation after phenylephrine compared to 0.9 (16.2) ms in the 13 patients without induced atrial fibrillation after phenylephrine infusion (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Phenylephrine infusion increased left atrial refractoriness and intra-atrial conduction delay following a premature right atrial extrastimulus. Induction of atrial fibrillation during phenylephrine infusion was associated with non-uniform changes in atrial refractoriness. These data support the concept that changes in autonomic tone may precipitate atrial fibrillation in susceptible individuals.     

Dispersion of atrial refractoriness in patients with sinus node dysfunction.

Abnormal atrial refractoriness was examined as a cause of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AFF) in patients with bradycardia. Refractory periods at three disparate right atrial sites were compared in 17 patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and 16 controls. Atrial pacing shortened refractory periods, but failed to decrease dispersion of refractoriness significantly. During sinus rhythm, duration and dispersion of refractoriness were greater in SND patients than in controls. These differences persisted with atrial pacing. For example, at the paced rate, dispersion of effective refractory periods in SND patients was greater than in controls (62.9 +/- 34 vs 36.6 +/- 21 msec, p less than 0.01). Six SND patients had AFF, but they did not have greater dispersion than other SND patients, or unusually short or long refractory periods. Thus, prolonged and nonuniform refractoriness were features of SND. Abnormal refractoriness in SND reflected atrial disease and persisted with pacing. These abnormalities were not unique to patients with AFF.     

Atrial electrophysiologic properties in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Study conducted with the stimulation of 5 atrial sites

Programmed atrial stimulation at five atrial sites was performed to evaluate electrophysiologic atrial properties in 17 control patients (14 M, 3F, mean age 61 +/- 9 years) (Group A) and in 18 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (13 M, 5 F, mean age 61 +/- 5 years) (Group B) with normal sinus node function. The mean value of the P wave duration was similar in both groups. Programmed atrial stimulation was performed at five atrial sites: high, medium and low lateral wall, and high and low medial wall. We evaluated the following parameters: A) local conduction delay measured at the functional refractory period as the difference between A1-A2 and S1-S2 intervals; B) widening of local electrogram measured at the functional refractory period as the difference between A1-A2 interval measured at the end of each local electrogram and A1-A2 interval measured at the beginning of each local electrogram. We evaluated the mean and the maximum value of the two above-mentioned parameters; C) dispersion of effective refractory period and functional refractory period, determined as the longest minus the shortest refractory period from the range of refractory periods measured in each patient; D) the mean of effective refractory periods and functional refractory periods observed at five atrial sites. Mean and maximum local conduction delay, mean effective and functional refractory periods did not present significant differences in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)