Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery for the treatment of patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE: Modeling studies have demonstrated a potential biologic advantage of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for malignant brain tumors as compared to radiosurgery (SRS), even when only a few fractions are utilized. We prospectively evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, efficacy and cost of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in the treatment of selected radiosurgery-eligible patients with brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a limited number of brain metastases not involving the brainstem or optic chiasm underwent linac-based HSRT delivered in 3 fractions using a relocatable stereotactic frame. Depth-helmet and reference point measurements were recorded to address treatment accuracy. All patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy to a dose of 30 Gy. Toxicity, response, and survival duration were recorded for each patient. Prognostic factors were assessed by Cox regression analysis. Cost comparisons with a cohort of SRS treated patients were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with 57 brain metastases were treated with HSRT. Twenty-three and 9 patients underwent HSRT for upfront and salvage treatment, respectively. The median dose delivered was 27 Gy, given in 3 fractions of 9 Gy. From 3328 depth-helmet measurements, the absolute median setup deviation in AP, lateral, and vertical orientations was approximately 1.0 mm. No significant acute toxicity was seen. Late toxicities included seizures in four patients, and radionecrosis in two patients. The median survival duration from treatment was 12 months. KPS (p = 0.039) and RTOG-RPA class (p = 0.039) were identified as significant prognostic factors for survival. HSRT was $4119 less costly than SRS. CONCLUSION: HSRT, as delivered in this study, is more comfortable for patients and less costly than SRS in the treatment of selected patients with brain metastases. Proper dose selection and radiobiologic/toxicity trade-offs with SRS await further study.     

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in combination with whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), for the treatment of 1-4 brain metastases, using a non invasive fixation of the skull, was investigated. METHODS: Between 04/2001 and 01/2006 30 patients with 44 brain metastases underwent irradiation. Every patient received WBRT (10 x 3 Gy); 41/44 lesions received HSRT boost with a median dose fraction of 6 Gy, the fractionation schemes were 3 x 6 Gy and 4 x 8 Gy; a median total dose of 18 Gy was delivered to the tumor isocenter. RESULTS: The median survival period was 9.15 months, the actuarial 1-year overall survival and freedom from new brain metastases were 36.6% and 87.9%, respectively; at univariate analysis Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was statistically significant (P = 0.05); the actuarial 1-year local control for the 41/44 lesions was 86.1%. No patient had acute or late complications. CONCLUSIONS: HSRT as a concomitant boost during WBRT is a safe and well tolerated treatment for selected patients with brain metastases.     

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases

BACKGROUND:

This retrospective review evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profiles of various dose fractionations using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in the treatment of brain metastases.

METHODS:

Between 2004 and 2007, 36 patients with 66 brain metastases were treated with HSRT. Nine of these subjects were excluded because of the absence of post‐treatment magnetic resonance imaging scans, resulting in 27 patients with a total of 52 lesions. Of these 52 lesions, 45 lesions were treated with whole‐brain radiotherapy plus a HSRT boost and 7 lesions were treated with HSRT as the primary treatment. The median prescribed dose was 25 grays (Gy) (range, 20 Gy‐36 Gy) with a median of 5 fractions (range, 4 fractions‐6 fractions) to a median 85% isodose line (range, 50%‐100%). The median follow‐up interval was 6.6 months (range, 0.9 months‐26.8 months).

RESULTS:

The median overall survival time was 10.8 months, and 66.7% of patients died of disease progression. After HSRT treatment of 52 brain lesions, 13 lesions demonstrated complete responses, 12 lesions demonstrated partial responses, 22 lesions demonstrated stable disease, and 5 lesions demonstrated progressive disease. Actuarial local tumor control rates at 6 months and 1 year were 93.9% and 68.2%, respectively. Maximum tumor dimension, concurrent chemotherapy, and a tumor volume <1 cc were found to be statistically significant factors for local tumor control. One patient had a grade 3 toxicity (according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events).

CONCLUSIONS:

HSRT provides a high level of tumor control with minimal toxicity comparable to single‐fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The results of the current study warrant a prospective randomized study comparing single‐fraction SRS with HSRT in this patient population. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: results and prognostic factors

This study was conducted to determine prognostic factors for tumor response and patient survival after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis. Eighty-four patients with brain metastasis underwent SRS at a single institution. After fixation of the head with a stereotactic frame, computed tomography treatment planning was performed. The metastatic lesion was treated with multiple arcs to a median dose of 19 Gy. Forty-seven patients (56%) had a solitary brain lesion. Fifty-nine patients (70%) had evidence of extracranial disease at the time of SRS. The median survival duration from SRS was 7 months. Sixty-three percent of the patients had an objective radiographic response to SRS, which in turn was associated with superior central nervous system control. Age, collimator size, number of arcs, tumor location, and histology did not influence objective response rates. Patients who had a solitary lesion or who received treatment within 2 weeks after diagnosis were more likely to have an objective response than were those who did not (P < 0.05). Progressive brain disease accounted for 37% of the deaths. Nineteen patients (23%) had an in-field relapse. Four severe complications were attributed to SRS. This study confirms the role of SRS as an acceptable treatment option for patients with solitary or limited brain metastases. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 157-162 (2000).     

Multimodality treatment of melanoma brain metastases incorporating stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are a frequent complication in advanced melanoma. A 3.6 to 4.1-month median survival has been reported after treatment with whole brain radiotherapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of our institutional experience of multimodality treatment utilizing linear accelerator (Linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Forty-four melanoma patients with brain metastases underwent 66 SRS treatments for 156 metastatic foci between 1999 and 2004. Patients were treated with initial SRS if or=70, but 37 patients had active systemic metastases (Recursive Partition Analysis Class 2). Survival was calculated from the time of diagnosis of brain metastases. Minimum follow-up was 1 year after SRS. The potential role of prognostic factors on survival was evaluated including age, sex, interval from initial diagnosis to brain metastases, surgical resection, addition of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), number of initial metastases treated, and number of SRS treatments using Cox univariate analysis. RESULTS: The median survival of melanoma patients with brain metastases was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.2-14.9 months) from diagnosis. One-year and 2-year survivals were 47.7% and 17.7%, respectively. There was no apparent effect of age or sex. Surgery or multiple stereotactic radiotherapy treatments were associated with prolonged survival. Addition of WBRT to maintain control of brain metastases in a subset of patients did not improve survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that aggressive treatment of patients with up to 5 melanoma brain metastases including SRS appears to prolong survival. Subsequent chemotherapy or immunotherapy after SRS may have contributed to the observed outcome.     

Population-based outcomes of boost versus salvage radiosurgery for brain metastases after whole brain radiotherapy

Purpose

We conducted a retrospective population-based study to examine the survival outcomes in patients with brain metastases treated with salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), compared to boost SRS, after previous whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

Methods and materials

From January 2000 to June 2011, 191 patients treated with WBRT and SRS for brain metastases in British Columbia were studied. Patients were divided into a boost cohort and a salvage cohort. The criteria used to determine eligibility for SRS were: 1–3 metastases, ?4 cm size, Karnofsky performance status ?70, and control of extracranial disease.

Results

Diagnosis by primary site was 84 lung, 47 breast, 15 melanoma, 12 renal, 9 colorectal, and 24 other. There were 113 patients (59%) in the boost cohort and 78 patients (41%) in the salvage cohort. The median overall survival from WBRT for the whole population was 17.7 months: 12.1 months for the boost cohort and 22.7 months for the salvage cohort. There was no difference in median survival after SRS for the boost and salvage cohorts (11.2 vs. 11.2 months, p = 0.78).

Conclusions

In selected patients with brain metastases treated with WBRT, survival following salvage SRS is as good as survival after WBRT + boost SRS.     

Clinical outcomes of patients treated with a second course of stereotactic radiosurgery for locally or regionally recurrent brain metastases after prior stereotactic radiosurgery

Patients with metastatic disease are living longer and may be confronted with locally or regionally recurrent brain metastases (BM) after prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). This study analyzes outcomes in patients without prior whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) who were treated with a second course of SRS/FSRT for locally or regionally recurrent BM. We identified 32 patients at our institution who were treated with a second course of SRS/FSRT after initial SRS/FSRT for newly diagnosed BM. We report clinical outcomes including local control, survival, and toxicities. Control rates and survival were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the multivariate proportional hazards model. The Kaplan–Meier estimate of local control at 6 months was 77 % for targets treated by a second course of SRS/FSRT with 11/71 (15 %) targets experiencing local failure. Multivariate analysis shows that upon re-treatment, local recurrences were more likely to fail than regional recurrences (OR 8.8, p = 0.02). Median survival for all patients from first SRS/FSRT was 14.6 months (5.3–72.2 months) and 7.9 months (0.7–61.1 months) from second SRS/FSRT. Thirty-eight percent of patients ultimately received WBRT as salvage therapy after the second SRS/FSRT. Seventy-one percent of patients died without active neurologic symptoms. The present study demonstrates that the majority of patients who progress after SRS/FSRT for newly diagnosed BM are candidates for salvage SRS/FSRT. By reserving WBRT for later salvage, we believe that a significant proportion of patients can avoid WBRT all together, thus putting fewer patients at risk for neurocognitive toxicity.     

Salvage Surgical Resection after Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastasis

Background: This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of salvage surgical resection (SSR) after stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/fSRT) for newly diagnosed brain metastasis. Methods: Between November 2009 and May 2020, 318 consecutive patients with 1114 brain metastases were treated with SRS/fSRT for newly diagnosed brain metastasis at our hospital. During this study period, 21 of 318 patients (6.6%) and 21 of 1114 brain metastases (1.9%) went on to receive SSR after SRS/fSRT. Three patients underwent multiple surgical resections. Twenty-one consecutive patients underwent twenty-four SSRs. Results: The median time from initial SRS/fSRT to SSR was 14 months (range: 2–96 months). The median follow-up after SSR was 17 months (range: 2–78 months). The range of tumor volume at initial SRS/fSRT was 0.12–21.46 cm³ (median: 1.02 cm³). Histopathological diagnosis after SSR was recurrence in 15 cases, and radiation necrosis (RN) or cyst formation in 6 cases. The time from SRS/fSRT to SSR was shorter in the recurrence than in the RNs and cyst formation, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.067). The median survival time from SSR and from initial SRS/fSRT was 17 and 74 months, respectively. The cases with recurrence had a shorter survival time from initial SRS/fSRT than those without recurrence (p = 0.061). Conclusions: The patients treated with SRS/fSRT for brain metastasis need long-term follow-up. SSR is a safe and effective treatment for the recurrence, RN, and cyst formation after SRS/fSRT for brain metastasis.     

Stereotactic irradiation using a linear accelerator for brain metastasis from renal cell carcinoma

Background The role of stereotactic irradiation using a linear accelerator for brain metastasis from renal cell carcinoma was investigated. Methods Fifteen brain metastases in 11 patients with a history of renal cell carcinoma were treated using convergent narrow x-ray beams from a linear accelerator and rigid fixation of the head with a stereotactic frame. Twelve metastatic tumors in8 patients were irradiated with 25 Gy at the center in a single fraction, and single tumors in 3 patients received the following doses: 25 Gy in 5 fractions, 28 Gy in 3 fractions, or 35 Gy in 4 fractions Results The actuarial local control rate at 12 months was 90.6%. Twelve (92%) of 13 lesions that produced neurologic symptoms before stereotactic irradiation showed an improvement of symptoms. No complication related to the irradiation was observed. The median survival time was 6 months. Conclusion Stereotactic irradiation is more effective in achieving local control than is conventional radiotherapy, and achieves improvement in symptoms and survival rates similar to those of surgical resection of the brain metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. Urologists and oncologists should be aware of the usefulness of stereotactic radiation in the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma.     

Stereotactic irradiation for intracranial arteriovenous malformation using stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To investigate the appropriateness of the treatment policy of stereotactic irradiation using both hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) located in an eloquent region or for large AVMs and using SRS alone for the other AVMs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Included in this study were 75 AVMs in 72 patients, with a mean follow-up of 52 months. Of the 75 AVMs, 33 were located in eloquent regions or were >2.5 cm in maximal diameter and were given 25-35 Gy (mean, 32.4 Gy) in four daily fractions at a single isocenter if the patient agreed to prolonged wearing of the stereotactic frame for 5 days. The other 42 AVMs were treated with SRS at a dose of 15-25 Gy (mean, 24.1 Gy) at the isocenter. The 75 AVMs were classified according to the Spetzler-Martin grading system; 21, 23, 28, 2, and 1 AVM were Grade I, II, III, IV, V, and VI, respectively. RESULTS: The overall actuarial rate of obliteration was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-56%) at 3 years, 72% (95% CI, 58-86%) at 5 years, and 78% (95% CI, 63-93%) at 6 years. The actuarial obliteration rate at 5 years was 79% for the 42 AVMs <2.0 cm and 66% for the 33 AVMs >2 cm. The 5- and 6-year actuarial obliteration rate was 61% (95% CI, 39-83%) and 71% (95% CI, 47-95%), respectively, after HSRT and 81% (95% CI, 66-96%) and 81% (95% CI, 66-96%), respectively, after SRS; the difference was not statistically significant. Radiation-induced necrosis was observed in 4 subjects in the SRS group and 1 subject in the HSRT group. Cyst formation occurred in 3 patients in the SRS group and no patient in the HSRT group. A permanent symptomatic complication was observed in 3 cases (4.2%), and 1 of the 3 was fatal. All 3 patients were in the SRS group. The annual intracranial hemorrhage rate was 5.5-5.6% for all patients. CONCLUSION: Our treatment policy using SRS and HSRT was as effective as the policy involving SRS alone. The HSRT schedule was suggested to have a lower frequency of radiation necrosis and cyst formation than the high-dose SRS schedule. The benefit of HSRT compared with lower dose SRS has not yet been determined.     

Influence of gamma knife radiosurgery on the quality of life in patients with brain metastases

Quality of life (QOL) is an important issue in the treatment of patients with brain metastases. With median survival times often less than 4 months, less invasive treatment options that maximize QOL parameters are essential. In recent years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been commonly used as a noninvasive alternative to surgical resection for such patients. This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate QOL in patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases. Between 1999 and 2000, 20 patients with metastatic disease to the brain were evaluated and treated in our Gamma Knife unit. All patients performed the Spitzer QOL survey (10-point scale) both before stereotactic radiosurgery and at each follow-up visit. Primary sites of disease included lung (n = 10), breast (n = 5), melanoma (n = 2), thyroid (n = 1), uterine (n = 1), and kidney (n = 1). Fifteen (75%) had prior whole brain radiotherapy (median dose: 35 Gy). The median age and Karnofsky Performance Status were 58 years and 80, respectively. The median Spitzer score before SRS was 9 (range: 7-10), and the median follow-up time of the patients in this series was 7 months. The median posttreatment Spitzer score at 1 and 3 months after SRS was 9 (range: 5-10) and 8 (range: 4-10), respectively. Crude intracranial tumor control in this cohort of patients was 90%. Extracranial tumor progression was noted in 8 patients (40%), and in these patients, Spitzer scores tended to decrease in value. In those patients who had no evidence of intracranial or extracranial tumor progression, Spitzer scores remained either unchanged or improved. Gamma knife SRS is an appropriate treatment modality for maintaining QOL parameters in patients with brain metastases. Tumor progression both intracranially and extracranially influences QOL parameters. Confirmation of this finding will require further investigation.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery as a therapeutic strategy for intracranial metastatic prostate carcinoma

Intracranial metastatic prostate carcinoma is rare. We sought to determine the clinical outcomes after Gamma Knife^® stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) for patients with intracranial prostate carcinoma metastases. We studied data from 10 patients who underwent radiosurgery for 15 intracranial metastases (9 dural-based and 6 parenchymal). Six patients had radiosurgery for solitary tumors and four had multiple tumors. The primary pathology was adenocarcinoma (eight patients) and small cell carcinoma (two patients). All patients received multimodality management for their primary tumor (including resection, radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy) and eight patients had evidence of systemic disease at time of radiosurgery. The mean tumor volume was 7.7 cm³ (range 1.1–17.2 cm³) and a median margin dose of 16 Gy was administered. Two patients had progressive intracranial disease in spite of fractionated partial brain radiation therapy (PBRT) prior to SRS. A local tumor control rate of 85% was achieved (including patients receiving boost, upfront and salvage SRS). New remote brain metastases developed in three patients (33%) and one patient had repeat SRS for tumor recurrence. The median survival after radiosurgery was 13 months and the 1-year survival rate was 60%. SRS was a well tolerated and effective therapy either alone or as a boost to fractionated radiation therapy in the management of patients with intracranial prostate carcinoma metastases.     

The influence of extent and local management on the outcome of radiotherapy for brain metastases

The results of cranial irradiation for brain metastases in 164 consecutive patients have been reviewed to evaluate a policy of localized high dose irradiation for solitary metastases. Fifty of the 164 patients receiving whole brain irradiation (35 Gy in 15 daily fractions) were selected for boosts delivering 15 Gy in 8 daily fractions to the site of solitary deposits. No difference in overall survival or the incidence of death from progressive brain metastases was seen between the patients receiving a boost and those who did not. Overall median survival was 112 days with 62% of patients dying from metastatic disease outside the brain. Factors associated with increased survival were early response to radiotherapy and, in breast cancer patients, a disease-free interval of 2 years. Palliation of presenting symptoms was achieved in 86% of patients at 3 weeks from starting radiotherapy. It is concluded that whereas whole brain irradiation results in useful symptom control, there is no advantage for high dose treatment in the majority of patients with solitary metastases even in the absence of metastatic disease elsewhere.     

Irradiations répétées de métastases cérébrales en conditions stéréotaxiques : revue de la littérature

Stereotactic radiotherapy has become a standard in the management of patients with brain metastases; its main interest is to differ whole brain radiotherapy, provider of neurocognitive toxicity and to increase the rate of local control. The repetition of radiotherapy sessions under stereotactic conditions is not codified, neither on the number of technically and clinically possible sessions, nor on the maximum total number or volume of metastases to be treated. The purpose of this review is to analyse the data in the literature concerning repeated irradiations under stereotactic conditions. The second reirradiation in stereotactic condition shows satisfactory results in terms of overall survival, local control, and toxicity. However, we lack data for patients receiving more than two sessions of SRS as well as to define dose constraints to reirradiated healthy tissues. Prospective trials are still needed to validate the management of recurrent brain metastases after initial SRS.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors

We report on a prospective phase TI study utilizing stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with intracranial parenchymal metastases. Fifty patients ranging in age from 38 to 77 years with 1 to 3 intraparenchymal brain metastases were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery either immediately following whole brain radiotherapy or at the time of intracranial disease progression following failure of whole brain radiotherapy. Twenty patients treated with adjuvant therapy received a median radiosurgical dose of 20 Gy. Thirty patients treated with salvage therapy received a median radiosurgical dose of 20 Gy. No immediate neurotoxicity was seen following radiosurgery however, 4 patients (8%) developed symptomatic radiation necrosis. Median survival was 6.5 and 6.0 months for patients treated with adjuvant and salvage radiosurgery respectively. In patients with oligometastatic brain metastases manifesting intracranial disease progression after whole brain radiotherapy, salvage radiotherapy appears to offer improved palliation when compared to retreatment with whole brain radiotherapy. The results of patients treated with up-front adjuvant radiosurgery when compared to historical controls treated with whole brain radiotherapy only are less clear as to benefit and require a phase III study before definitive recommendations can be made.     

Long-term survival in a patient with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with multiple courses of salvage stereotactic radiation after whole brain radiotherapy: A case report

Intracranial recurrence following initial cranial irradiation for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) can often be a treatment dilemma given the aggressive nature of the disease, the overall poor prognosis and concerns regarding re-treatment toxicity. The present report describes the case of a 62-year-old man diagnosed with ES-SCLC and synchronous brain metastases who initially underwent whole brain radiotherapy, chemotherapy and consolidative thoracic radiotherapy. The patient was found to have a solitary intracranial recurrence at both 3.5 and 6 years after his diagnosis. On both occasions, the patient received salvage stereotactic radiation, 30 Gy in 5 fractions, and continues to remain functionally independent. Overall, the present case demonstrates that with the appropriate patient selection, aggressive local salvage of recurrent intracranial ES-SCLC with stereotactic radiation can yield excellent and durable clinical outcomes.     

X射线立体定向放射治疗配合全脑照射治疗脑转移瘤疗效分析

目的　分析X射线立体定向放射治疗(SRS)配合全脑照射治疗脑转移瘤的作用。方法　对55例脑转移瘤患者进行SRS配合全脑照射,17例行单纯SRS治疗。全脑照射采用8?MVX射线,1.5～2.0 Gy/次,DT30～42 Gy,4～5周;SRS处方剂量为18～30 Gy,SRS前行全脑放射治疗39例,SRS后行全脑放射治疗16例。结果　SRS加全脑照射组病变完全消失(CR)占60.0%,部分消失(PR)占32.7%,无变化(NC)占7.3%,总缓解率(CR+PR)为92.7%;与单纯SRS组的35.0%、41.2%、23.5%、76.2%相比差异无显著性意义（χ2=3.47,P＞0.05）。SRS加全脑照射组复发率为14.5%,中位复发时间为10个月,中位生存时间为13个月;与单纯SRS组的41.2%、4个月、7.5个月相比差异有显著性意义(χ     

Analysis of tumor control and toxicity in patients who have survived at least one year after radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE: To better evaluate tumor control and toxicity from radiosurgery for brain metastases, we analyzed these outcomes in patients who had survived at least 1 year after radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the results of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for 208 brain metastases in 137 patients who were followed for a median of 18 months (range 12-122) after radiosurgery. The median patient age was 53 years (range 3-83). Ninety-nine patients had solitary metastases. Thirty-eight had multiple tumors. Sixty-nine patients underwent initial SRS with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), 39 had initial SRS alone, and 27 patients had failed prior WBRT. The median treatment volume was 1.9 cm(3) (range 0.05-21.2). The median marginal tumor dose was 16 Gy (range 12-25). The most common histologic types included non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma, which comprised 37.0%, 22.6%, 13.0%, and 9.13% of the lesions, respectively. Forty-five tumors were associated with extensive edema. RESULTS: At 1 and 5 years, the local tumor control rate was 89.6% +/- 2.1% and 62.8% +/- 6.9%, distal intracranial relapse occurred in 23% +/- 3.6% and 67.1% +/- 8.7%, and postradiosurgical sequelae developed in 2.8% +/- 1.2% and 11.4% +/- 3.5% of patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that local control decreased with tumor volume (p = 0.0002), SRS without WBRT (p = 0.008), and extensive edema (p = 0.024); distal intracranial recurrence correlated with younger patient age (p = 0.0018); and postradiosurgical sequelae increased with increasing tumor volume (p = 0.0085). CONCLUSION: Long-term control of brain metastases and complication rates in this selective series of patients surviving >or=1 year after radiosurgery were similar to previously reported actuarial estimates. Large metastases and metastases associated with extensive edema can be difficult to control by radiosurgery, particularly without WBRT.     

Linac-based radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of large cerebral arteriovenous malformations

PURPOSE: We investigate retrospectively clinical outcome after radiosurgery (RS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in patients with large cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This analysis is based on 48 patients with cerebral AVM greater than 4 cm treated with HSRT or RS at our institution. Fifteen patients received HSRT, with 26 Gy median total dose in 4 to 5 fractions, and 33 patients received RS with 17 Gy median total dose in 4 to 5 fractions. Median target volume was 27 cc in HSRT and 7 cc in RS; median maximum diameter was 6 cm and 5 cm, respectively. Seventeen patients experienced intracranial hemorrhage before treatment. Median follow-up was 2.6 years. RESULTS: The 3-year and 4-year actuarial complete obliteration (CO) after HSRT was 17% and 33% and after RS was 47% and 60%, respectively. Actuarial CO was higher in AVMs less than 5 cm (66% vs. 37% after 4 years). Intracranial hemorrhage after HSRT occurred in 3 of 15 patients after 18 months median, and after RS in 7 of 33 patients after 17 months median. Bleeding risk was significantly higher in patients with prior hemorrhage (p < 0.04). Preexisting neurologic dysfunction improved/dissolved in 50% and remained stable in 45%. CONCLUSIONS: Large AVMs need a long time period to obliterate and show a high bleeding risk. Multimodal treatment strategies are required to reduce treatment volume before radiotherapy.