Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as a Consolidative Strategy for the Treatment of Primary and Isolated Secondary Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphomas

IntroductionStandard consolidation for primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (CNS) (PCNSL) is not established. This single center, retrospective observational study aims to define the outcomes of consolidative high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) in patients with PCNSL and isolated secondary CNS DLBCL (SCNSL) and evaluate the prognostic factors.Patients and MethodsAll consecutive patients performed an HDC/ASCT for PCNSL or isolated SCNSLs between October 2012 and February 2022 were identified. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsAmong 35 patients included, 28 had PCNSL and 7 had isolated SCNSL. Median age was 51 (16-78). Males constituted 48.6%. Median follow-up after HDC/ASCT was 42.0 months. MATRIX (51.4%) and TEAM (80.0%) were the most frequent regimens of induction and conditioning, respectively. OS and PFS 1- and 2-year after HDC/ASCT were 68.0%, 57.0%, 58.0%, 48.0%, respectively. Increasing age, poor performance and comorbidities were associated with lower OS and PFS and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). Complete response (CR) 1 at HDC/ACST was independently associated with higher OS and PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 4.67 and 6.99, respectively].ConclusionIn patients < 60 years consolidative HDC/ASCT yields promising OS and PFS. Patients ≥ 60 years may less likely benefit from consolidative HDC/ASCT and should be studied further in trials of novel agents, lower doses of consolidative radiotherapy and dose-adjusted conditioning regimens. Not only age, but also comorbidities, clinical performance and response to induction correlate with outcomes. Patients with isolated SCNSL may achieve similar outcomes.     

Prognosis after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation as first-line treatment in primary CNS lymphoma--a long-term follow-up study

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HCT–ASCT) is a promising approach in eligible patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We report long-term data of patients who were treated according to HCT–ASCT containing protocols.Patients and methodsWe analyzed survival and relapse rates in 43 (<67 years) immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL being treated according to two different high-dose methotrexate-based protocols followed by high-dose carmustine/thiotepa (BCNU/TT) plus ASCT (±whole brain irradiation). Analysis was conducted for all patients (intention-to-treat) and those patients who actually received HCT–ASCT (per-protocol).ResultsThirty-four patients achieved complete remission, of those 12 relapsed (35%), while 6 of them relapsed 5 years after diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 120 months, median overall survival (OS) was reached after 104 months. Two- and 5-year OS was 81% and 70% and 2- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 81% and 67%, respectively. In per-protocol analysis (N = 34), 5-year OS and EFS was 82% and 79%, respectively. HCT–ASCT associated related mortality was not observed.ConclusionsSequential high-dose MTX containing chemotherapy followed by high-dose carmustine/thiotepa plus ASCT (±whole brain irradiation) is safe and leads to high survival rates in eligible patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL.     

Durable Survival Outcomes in Primary and Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma After High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Thiotepa,Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been investigated in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with CNS involvement and has shown promising results.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 48 consecutive patients who had undergone HDC/ASCT with TBC (thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide) conditioning for PCNSL (27 patients), secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) (8 patients), or relapsed disease with CNS involvement (13 patients) from July 2006 to December 2017. Of the 27 patients with PCNSL, 21 had undergone ASCT at first complete remission (CR1).ResultsThe 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.9-92.9) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 80.1% (95% CI, 69.2%-92.7%) among all patients. The 2-year PFS and OS rate for patients with PCNSL in CR1 was 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%) and 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%), respectively. On univariate analysis of the patients with PCNSL, ASCT in CR1 was the only variable statistically significant for outcome (P = .007 for PFS; P = .008 for OS). Among patients with SCNSL or CNS relapse, the 2-year PFS and OS rate were comparable at 75.9% (95% CI, 59.5%-96.8%) and 75.3% (95% CI, 58.6%-98.6%), respectively. The most common side effects were febrile neutropenia (89.6%; of which 66.7% had an infectious etiology identified), nausea/vomiting (85.4%), diarrhea (93.8%), mucositis (89.6%), and electrolyte abnormalities (89.6%). Four patients (8.3%) died of treatment-related overwhelming infection; of these patients, 3 had SCNSL.ConclusionHDC and ASCT using TBC conditioning for both PCNSL and secondary CNS NHL appears to have encouraging long-term efficacy with manageable side effects.     

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Series and a Review of the Literature

BackgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is associated with poor outcomes. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been reported to improve outcomes when used as a consolidation strategy in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and as a salvage strategy in patients with disease relapse limited to the CNS. Herein, we describe our experience of using ASCT in PCNSL and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL).Patients and MethodsWe evaluated clinical outcomes of 18 patients from 2 major academic centers with a median age of 55 (range, 46-72) years. Thirteen patients had PCNSL and 5 patients had SCNSL. Most of the cases were in the first (CR1) or second (CR2) complete remission (CR1 = 7, CR2 = 7) at the time of ASCT. Carmustine with thiotepa (n = 12, 67%) was the most commonly prescribed preparative regimen.ResultsThe median follow-up from ASCT for surviving patients was 12 (range, 0.9-115) months. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%-99%) and 80% (95% CI, 55%-100%), respectively. Two-year non-relapse mortality was 0%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was 27% (95% CI, 10%-72%). In subgroup analysis of PCNSL patients, 2-year PFS, OS, and relapse were 71% (95% CI, 38%-100%), 71% (95% CI, 38%-100%), and 29% (95% CI, 9%-92%), respectively.ConclusionIn this retrospective study of patients with CNS lymphoma, consolidation with ASCT after high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy is safe and effective in reducing disease relapse.     

A prospective phase II trial of response adapted whole brain radiotherapy after high dose methotrexate based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma-analysis of acute toxicity profile and early clinical outcome

Background

The treatment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) comprises high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) based chemotherapy followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), the major drawback of which is long term neurotoxicity. We intended to assess the feasibility of response adapted WBRT in PCNSL in the Indian setting.

Methods

We screened 32 patients and enrolled 22 eligible patients with PCNSL from 2015 to 2017 in a prospective phase II trial. The patients underwent five 2-weekly cycles of induction chemotherapy with rituximab, methotrexate, vincristine, procarbazine. Patients with complete response(CR) to induction chemotherapy were given reduced dose WBRT 23.4 Gy/13 fractions/2.5 weeks while those with partial response (PR), stable or progressive disease (SD or PD) were given standard dose WBRT 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. Thereafter two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with cytarabine were given. The primary endpoints of the study were assessment of response rate (RR) and progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints of the study were assessment of overall survival (OS), toxicity profile of treatment and serial changes in quality of life and neuropsychological parameters.

Results

Out of 19 patients who completed HDMTX based chemotherapy, 10 (52.63%) patients achieved CR, 8 (42.11%) patients had PR and 1 patient had PD. After a median follow-up period of 11.25 months, the estimated median OS was 19 months. The actuarial rates of PFS and OS were respectively 94.1 and 68.2% at 1 year and 50.2 and 48.5% at 2 years. Three patients in reduced dose WBRT arm had recurrence and two of them died of progressive disease, whereas there was no recurrence or disease related death in standard dose WBRT arm. On univariate analysis of PFS, age?≤?50 years and use of standard dose WBRT (45 Gy) led to significantly improved outcome (p value 0.03 and 0.02 respectively).

Conclusion

In patients with PCNSL, reduced dose WBRT after CR to HDMTX based chemotherapy may lead to suboptimal clinical outcome due to higher risk of recurrence, progression and early death. Trial Registration No CTRI/2015/10/006268

     

Diagnosis and management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive extranodal non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that is confined to the brain, eyes, spinal cord, or leptomeninges without systemic involvement. The overall prognosis, diagnosis, and management of PCNSL differ from those for other types of NHL. Prompt diagnosis and initiation of treatment are vital for improving clinical outcomes. PCNSL is responsive to radiation therapy; however, whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) inadequately controls the disease when it is used alone, and its delayed neurotoxicity causes neurocognitive impairment, especially in elderly patients. High‐dose methotrexate (HD‐MTX)–based induction chemotherapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or reduced‐dose WBRT leads to durable disease control and less neurotoxicity. The optimal treatment has yet to be defined; however, HD‐MTX–based induction chemotherapy is considered standard for newly diagnosed PCNSL. Ongoing randomized trials are addressing the roles of rituximab and consolidative treatment with ASCT or reduced‐dose WBRT. Despite high tumor response rates with the initial treatment, many patients relapse with a very poor prognosis. The optimal treatment for refractory or relapsed PCNSL is poorly defined. The choice of salvage treatment depends on a patient's age, previous treatment and response, performance status, and comorbidities at the time of relapse. This review provides an overview of the clinical features, diagnosis, pathology, and management of PCNSL in immunocompetent patients, and it focuses on recent advances in treatment. Cancer 2017;123:4314‐24 . © 2017 American Cancer Society.     

Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methotrexate is first-line chemotherapy. Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is increasingly used as an alternative consolidative treatment to whole-brain radiotherapy.

42例原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者预后影响因素分析

背景与目的：原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤（primary central nervous system lymphoma,PCNSL）是发生在脑、脊髓、脑膜或眼的罕见侵袭型非霍奇金淋巴瘤,无CNS之外的部位累及。PCNSL与其他类型淋巴瘤相比,患者生存期短,预后差,且复发率高,未经治疗的患者的中位生存期仅为3个月。近年来研究发现C-MYC、BCL-2、BCL-6、Ki-67等指标在一定程度上影响PCNSL患者预后。因此,通过分析PCNSL相关蛋白表达、治疗方式及其他临床因素对患者预后的影响, 希望为该病的临床治疗及预后评价进一步积累资料。方法：回顾性分析自2013年6月—2021年5月于大连医科大学附属第二医院治疗的42例经病理学检查明确诊断为原发性中枢神经系统弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的临床资料,包括性别、年龄、病灶数量、美国东部肿瘤协作组（Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group,ECOG）评分、血清乳酸脱氢酶（lactate dehydrogenase,LDH）、病灶是否累及深部脑组织、治疗方案、病理学Hans分型及C-MYC、BCL-2、BCL-6、Ki-67等生物标志物,结合随访调查,了解患者生存时间及生存状况,应用Kaplan-Meier法及log-rank检验分析影响患者无进展生存期（progression-free survival,PFS）和总生存期（overall survival,OS）的预后相关因素,多因素分析采用COX回归模型。结果：42例PCNSL患者中位发病年龄61岁,男女比例为1.33∶1.00,颅脑增强MRI病灶多呈均匀明显强化。所有患者均接受含有大剂量甲氨蝶呤（high-dose methotrexate,HD-MTX）方案化疗,治疗后评价完全缓解（complete response,CR）20例、部分缓解（partial response,PR）5例,疾病稳定（stable disease,SD）11例,疾病进展（progressive disease,PD）6例。中位PFS为21个月,中位OS为34个月,1年PFS率为63.7%,2年PFS率为47.0%;1年OS率为70.8%,2年OS率为55.6%。单因素分析结果显示,影响PFS的因素是HD-MTX多药联合化疗、鞘内化疗及联合利妥昔单抗。影响OS的因素是ECOG评分≥2、C-MYC（+）、BCL-2及C-MYC双表达、HD-MTX多药联合化疗、鞘内化疗及联合利妥昔单抗。多因素分析结果显示：利妥昔单抗治疗是影响PFS的独立预后因素（P=0.020）,ECOG评分、利妥昔单抗是影响OS的独立预后因素（P=0.007;P=0.046）。与未接受巩固治疗的患者相比,接受巩固治疗患者的中位PFS及OS较高;进一步的亚组分析显示,自体干细胞移植（autologous stem cell transplantation,ASCT）组的中位PFS及OS较全脑放疗（whole brain radiation therapy,WBRT）组高,但差异无统计学意义。结论：PCNSL多发于中老年人,男性多于女性,影像学缺乏特异性。ECOG评分≥2与PCNSL患者较差的OS相关。C-MYC（+）、BCL-2及C-MYC双表达可作为指导危险分层的预后标志物。以HD-MTX为基础的多药联合化疗已经成为PCNSL的首选治疗手段,利妥昔单抗的应用可延长生存期。在全身化疗的基础上,联合局部鞘内化疗可以改善预后。进一步的巩固治疗主要包括ASCT及WBRT,可延长PFS及OS,ASCT可以取得与WBRT相似的疗效,且可避免WBRT的晚期神经毒性,但本研究中因样本量及随访时间的限制,未得出明确的统计学结果。     

Consolidative Radiotherapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Introduction

We evaluated the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Outcome of patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma referred for autologous stem-cell transplantation

BackgroundThe proportion of potentially eligible patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma who undergo autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown. There are limited data describing their outcome in the rituximab era.Patients and methodsWe reviewed 105 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven transformation referred to Princess Margaret Hospital for consideration of ASCT during 1996–2009. Patients received anthracycline or platinum-based chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Responders proceeded to stem-cell mobilization and ASCT.ResultsThe median age at transformation was 54 (range 30–65) years. Patients received a median of two chemotherapy regimens for transformation, including rituximab in 39%. Fifty patients (48%) proceeded with ASCT and 55 (52%) did not, mainly due to progressive disease (n = 42). Three-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) post-ASCT were 54% and 42%, respectively. Patients receiving rituximab with chemotherapy before transplant had a 3-year post-ASCT OS of 71% versus 47% in those who received chemotherapy alone (P = 0.046). Patients transplanted after 2004 had a 3-year post-ASCT OS of 69% versus 39% in those receiving ASCT earlier (P = 0.009).ConclusionsAbout half of transplant-eligible patients with transformation are able to undergo ASCT. Outcomes following ASCT appear to have improved over recent years, although the role of rituximab in this patient population requires further evaluation.     

Outcome determinants for transformed indolent lymphomas treated with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation

The purpose of this work was to determine whether the outcome of patients with transformed indolent lymphoma improved if they, after R-chemo, also received upfront autologous stem-cell transplantation. Upfront autologous stem-cell transplant improved the outcome in sequential, but not composite/discordant TIL. The beneficial impact of ASCT was greater in patients, who were rituximab-naïve at transformation.BackgroundTransformation of indolent lymphomas (IL) to an aggressive histology (TIL) often results in a rapid clinical course, treatment refractoriness and shortened survival. Although rituximab-containing regimens (R-chemo) have become standard of care in CD20-positive TIL, the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is still debated. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the outcome of TIL patients improved if they, at transformation, also received ASCT. Furthermore, we investigated the outcome of cases with histologically low- and high-grade components diagnosed either simultaneously or after a period of overt indolent disease. We also analyzed, whether prior rituximab treatment during the indolent course of the disease affected outcome after transformation.Patients and methodsEighty-five patients (≤68 years) with histologically confirmed TIL were included. Five-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Selected parameters were tested in a multivariate analysis. All analyses were conducted on three cohorts: (i) whole cohort (all TIL), (ii) patients with co-existing evidence of both indolent and aggressive histology at diagnosis (Composite/discordant TIL) and (iii) patients transformed after prolonged prior indolent disease (sequential TIL).ResultsFifty-four patients (64%) received ASCT consolidation and 31 (36%) did not. Within the ‘all TIL’ cohort, the 5-year OS and PFS for R-chemo + ASCT versus R-chemo alone, were 67% versus 48% (P = 0.11) and 60% versus 30% (P = 0.02), respectively. Furthermore, in ‘Composite/discordant TIL’ R-chemo + ASCT showed no impact on OS (76% versus 67%; P = 0.66) or PFS (71% versus 62%; P = 0.54). Conversely, R-chemo + ASCT improved the outcome of ‘sequential TIL’ (OS 62% versus 36%; P = 0.07; PFS 53% versus 6%; P = 0.002), regardless of prior rituximab therapy. The beneficial effect of ASCT was significantly higher in patients who had not received rituximab at IL stage.ConclusionsASCT improved the outcome in sequential, but not composite/discordant TIL. The beneficial impact of ASCT was greater in patients, who were rituximab-naïve at transformation.     

Role of up-front autologous stem-cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma for patients in response after induction: an analysis of patients from LYSA centers

BackgroundPeripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remains a therapeutic challenge. Due to the rarity and the heterogeneity of PTCL, no consensus has been achieved regarding even the type of first-line treatment. The benefit of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is, therefore, still intensely debated.Patients and methodsIn the absence of randomized trials addressing the role of ASCT, we performed a large multicentric retrospective study and used both a multivariate proportional hazard model and a propensity score matching approach to correct for sample selection bias between patients allocated or not to ASCT in intention-to-treat (ITT).ResultsAmong 527 patients screened from 14 centers in France, Belgium and Portugal, a final cohort of 269 patients ≤65 years old with PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS) (N = 78, 29%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (N = 123, 46%) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-ALCL) (N = 68, 25%) with partial (N = 52, 19%) or complete responses (N = 217, 81%) after induction was identified and information about treatment allocation was carefully collected before therapy initiation from medical records. One hundred and thirty-four patients were allocated to ASCT in ITT and 135 were not. Neither the Cox multivariate model (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.69–1.50 for PFS and HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.68–1.69 for OS) nor the propensity score analysis after stringent matching for potential confounding factors (logrank P = 0.90 and 0.66 for PFS and OS, respectively) found a survival advantage in favor of ASCT as a consolidation procedure for patients in response after induction. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any further difference for patients according to response status, stage disease or risk category.ConclusionsThe present data do not support the use of ASCT for up-front consolidation for all patients with PTCL-NOS, AITL, or ALK-ALCL with partial or complete response after induction.     

Favorable Long-Term Outcomes with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients with a Positive Result On 18F-FDG PET/CT at Baseline

Background18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) is a useful tool for identifying high-risk features in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study evaluated the role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients presenting with positive results on PET/CT scans.Materials and MethodsThe medical records of 210 patients who underwent PET/CT at diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients for transplantation proceeded to upfront ASCT with high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) after induction therapy with novel agents.ResultsThe presence of a number of focal lesions (FL) >3 and extramedullary disease (EMD) occurred in 111 and 35 patients, respectively. ASCT was performed in 54 patients. Among patients with FL > 3, those treated with ASCT showed a prolonged 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates compared to those not treated with ASCT (PFS, 60.2% vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001; OS, 91.7% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.005). In patients with FL ≤ 3, treatment by ASCT was associated with a higher 2-year PFS rate than no treatment by ASCT (74.0% vs. 54.9%, P = 0.040). The OS of patients treated with ASCT was not significantly longer than that of patients not treated with ASCT (P = 0.115). In multivariate analysis, FL > 3, Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), and upfront ASCT were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS.ConclusionPresenting FL > 3 on baseline PET/CT represents a high-risk feature in patients with NDMM. Frontline ASCT with HDT prolonged the survival of patients with FL > 3.     

Survival outcomes after whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases in older adults with newly diagnosed metastatic small cell carcinoma: A national cancer database (NCDB) analysis

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a tendency to affect older adults and also metastasize to the brain. Older adults tolerate whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) poorly with marginal survival benefit. We utilized the national cancer database (NCDB) to evaluate the survival outcomes following WBRT in older adults with SCLC and brain metastases.MethodsWe identified 1615 patients ≥75 years old diagnosed with SCLC and brain metastases. Patients were categorized by type of therapy: chemotherapy + WBRT (n = 576), chemotherapy alone (n = 238), WBRT alone (n = 360) and no chemotherapy or WBRT (n = 441). Clinical and demographic characteristics were reported for each treatment cohort with a subsequent multivariable regression analysis for survival.ResultsMedian patient age was 79 years. WBRT median dose was 30 Gy. At time of analysis, 1530 of the cohort had died, yielding a median OS of 2.9 months and 6 month survival of 31% for patients that received chemotherapy. For patients treated without chemotherapy, median OS with WBRT was 1.9 months compared to 1.2 months without (p < .0001). For patients receiving chemotherapy with, and without WBRT, median OS was 5.6 months and 6.4 months, respectively (p = .43). Multivariable cox regression revealed age > 80, extracranial disease, male sex, and rural location as predictors of increased risk of death.ConclusionIn older adult patients with SCLC brain metastasis, WBRT was associated with a modest increase in survival in patients not fit for chemotherapy, and there was no association with increased survival over chemotherapy alone.     

High-dose Thiotepa,Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide,and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as Upfront Consolidation for Systemic Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Synchronous Central Nervous System Involvement

IntroductionSynchronous involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) at the diagnosis of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is associated with an increased risk for relapse despite complete remission to initial therapy. High-dose chemotherapy with a CNS-directed conditioning regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) holds promise as a consolidative approach.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with systemic B-cell NHL and synchronous CNS involvement who received upfront consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and ASCT while in first complete remission between July 2008 and June 2016 at 2 partner academic institutions.ResultsTwenty patients were identified through the transplant database. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range, 37-65 years). The majority had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histology (n = 17; 85%). The sites of CNS involvement were parenchymal (n = 12; 60%) and leptomeningeal disease (n = 9; 45%). All patients received systemic and CNS-directed therapy prior to transplant, with the most common approaches being R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone) (n = 13; 65%) and high-dose intravenous methotrexate (n = 16; 80%), respectively. With a median follow up of 4.4 years after ASCT (range, 2 months-8.5 years), the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year progression-free and overall survival were 77% (95% confidence interval, 48%-91%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 54%-94%), respectively.ConclusionCNS-directed high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT provides durable remission for patients with synchronous aggressive lymphoma and should be strongly considered as consolidative therapy for eligible patients with systemic NHL with CNS involvement in first complete remission.     

Outcomes Related to FDG-PET-CT Response in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With Brentuximab-Vedotin at Relapse or Consolidation

BackgroundBrentuximab-vedotin (BV) monotherapy has shown high efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after high-dose chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of treatment with BV of HL patients and examined the predictive ability of PET-CT for response in this setting.Patients and methodsRecords of 49 HL patients (median age, 39 years, 55% male) treated with BV for relapse (71.4%) or consolidation (28.6%) post-ASCT were analyzed. Patients who did not reach complete response (CR) on PET/CT after 4 cycles (non-responders) discontinued BV and received the next treatment line. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between responders and non-responders.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 19.1 months, all consolidation patients were alive and none progressed. Median OS in 23 relapsed patients that did not achieve CR after 4 cycles and continued to the next treatment was 55.0 months, while all those in CR (n = 24) were alive (P = .0120). No statistically significant differences in OS were observed between responders and non-responders with relapsed HL (P = .1072). Median PFS evaluated after 4 BV cycles was significantly longer in responders compared to non-responders (47.9 vs. 1.5 months, P < .0001). Neuropathy and neutropenia were the main toxicities observed.ConclusionsHL patients treated with BV for relapse or consolidation who achieved CR by PET-CT after 4 cycles showed improved PFS and OS compared to non-responders. Non-responders treated for relapsed HL who proceeded to the next treatment line demonstrated comparable OS to responders.     

全脑放疗在原发中枢神经系统淋巴瘤治疗中的是是非非

原发中枢神经系统淋巴瘤是一种高侵袭性的结外非霍奇金淋巴瘤,全脑放疗联合高剂量甲氨蝶呤化疗是目前的主要治疗方案。尽管原发中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者对放疗敏感,但响应时间短,且易引起延迟性神经损伤,尤其是老年患者。减低剂量的全脑放疗、自体干细胞移植可以减少神经毒性,但疗效有待进一步研究。对于老年患者,一线治疗中的全脑放疗需要慎重考虑。     

Potential Benefit of Involved-Field Radiotherapy for Patients With Relapsed-Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma With Incomplete Response Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

IntroductionWe investigated for a possible role for peritransplantation involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) by comparing patients who received IFRT before after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and patients who received salvage chemotherapy (CT) alone.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 73 consecutive patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ASCT between 2003 and 2014. Twenty-one patients (28.8%) received peritransplantation radiotherapy. A Cox regression analysis (multivariate analysis; MVA) was performed to evaluate the prognostic role of any risk factor. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the date of ASCT. Response to CT and ASCT were evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET) scan.ResultsMedian follow-up was 41 months (range, 1-136 months). Overall, no significant difference appeared between patients who received IFRT and patients treated with CT alone; however, patients who were treated with IFRT had worse prognostic factors. In the MVA, advanced stage at relapse and persistent disease before ASCT (evident on PET scan [PET+]) were related to worse PFS and OS. In patients with limited stage disease at relapse and PET+, peritransplantation radiotherapy showed higher 3-year OS rates (91.7% vs. 62.3%) and PFS rates (67.5% vs. 50%) compared with patients treated with CT alone, although this difference was not significant (P = .14 and P = .22, respectively).ConclusionIFRT used before or after ASCT might partially compensate for worse prognostic factors among the overall population; subgroup analysis showed a trend for survival benefit at 3 years in patients with limited stage disease at relapse and PET+ before ASCT.     

Primary CNS lymphoma in patients younger than 60: can whole-brain radiotherapy be deferred?

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been increasingly omitted as the first treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) because of neurotoxicity risks. However, neurotoxicity risks are lower in young (<60 years) patients; deferring WBRT may not be necessary and may compromise disease control. To investigate this question, we report a consecutive series of young (<60 years) PCNSL patients uniformly treated with a response-adjusted approach, with WBRT omitted in patients with chemosensitive disease. Treatment started with induction chemotherapy consisting of methotrexate (3 g/m(2)), CCNU, procarbazine, methylprednisolone and intrathecal methotrexate, cytarabine, and methylprednisolone. Patients achieving complete response (CR) received five additional chemotherapy cycles and no further treatment. Patients with less than CR were treated on an individual basis, typically with WBRT or high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with stem cell rescue. Sixty-four patients were included (median age: 47; median KPS: 70). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months; median overall survival (OS) was 63 months (median follow-up: 108 months). Objective response after induction was 87% (CR: 54%; PR: 33%). To date, salvage WBRT has been given to a total of 27 patients and HDC to 29. Neurotoxicity developed in five patients (none in patients treated with chemotherapy only). Deferring WBRT in chemosensitive patients seems to compromise PFS but not OS. Neurotoxicity was reduced but not eliminated, as salvage WBRT was frequently required. HDC and WBRT were effective salvage treatments. As the objective of treatment in this population is a cure, withholding WBRT may not be the best strategy and deserves further investigation. Ongoing studies are investigating whether upfront treatment with HDC can replace WBRT in this setting.