经脐单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术手术路径的程序化

目的:探讨单孔腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术手术路径的程序化,以提高手术效率,缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量。方法:回顾分析2009年12月至2011年11月40例单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的临床资料,详细总结右半结肠的游离步骤,以手术时间及术中出血量作为评估指标,从而证实此手术路径的可行性。结果:40例均顺利完成手术,无一例中转开腹,手术时间90～240 min,术中出血量10～100 ml,术后患者满意度较好。结论:通过将手术步骤程序化,手术组成员可在较短的时间内熟悉整个操作过程,配合更加默契,明显缩短了手术时间,减少了术中出血量,手术过程更流畅。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术

<正>经脐单孔腹腔镜手术是近年刚开展的微创手术技术。由于操作方法类似多孔法腹腔镜,从而比经自然腔道内镜手     

单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术31例临床分析

目的：探讨单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2014年1月－2014年6月期间在我院行单孔腹腔镜治疗的31例升结肠癌患者的完整临床资料作为研究对象,研究该治疗方法的安全性与有效性。结果31例患者未出现1例术中死亡,其中26例患者单孔腹腔镜手术顺利完成,其余5例（16．13％）进行中转开腹。手术时间为（118．4±52．7）min,手术过程中患者出血量为（104．7±79．2）ml。术后腹水及感染各1例,特殊治疗后均好转出院。结论采用单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌是一种有效的治疗方案,具有损伤小、术后康复快等一系列优势,值得推广。     

单孔腹腔镜手术治疗右半结肠癌的回顾分析

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜在右半结肠癌根治性手术中的安全性和可行性.方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年6月常熟市第二人民医院胃肠外科联合上海瑞金医院外科开展的60例腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治性手术,分为单孔法30例与传统五孔法30例.对病人的临床病例资料、手术情况、术后并发症等进行比较.结果:切口长度、术中出血量、肿瘤...     

单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术6例

单孔腹腔镜技术是近年来新兴起的一种微创技术,是在常规腹腔镜技术基础之上的提高,通常仅在脐部建立一个小切口来完成手术操作,术后脐部瘢痕隐蔽,可以满足更高的微创和心理需求[1-2].但由于单孔条件下操作难度增大,目前在结直肠手术中的应用尚处在探索阶段,尤其在操作难度较大的右半结肠手术中,单孔腹腔镜还有待积累和总结经验[3-4].我们于2010年4月-2012年3月行单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术6例,总结报告如下.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床研究

目的 评估现阶段经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystecto-my,TUSPLC)的安全性、可行性及优势.方法 回顾分析我院肝胆胰脾外科开展的经脐单孔LC 40 例临床资料.结果 40 例手术中37 例成功,手术时间48~130 m...     

经脐单孔腹腔镜技术在肝脏手术中的应用

目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在肝脏外科中的应用,总结其可行性及局限性。方法回顾性分析11例行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术患者的临床资料,其中肝血管瘤8例、肝囊肿3例。经脐下缘做一长约1.5cm弧形切口,置入3个5mmTrocar,其中5例采用R-port切除肝血管瘤,器械均采用多角度可旋转分离钳。结果 11例患者均在经脐单孔腹腔镜下完成手术,手术后患者平均住院日4d,无1例出现胆瘘、腹腔出血等严重并发症。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜手术安全、可行,且具有瘢痕小、切口美观、患者疼痛轻等特点,但肝脏为实质性脏器,解剖结构复杂及腹腔镜器械限制了单孔腹腔镜技术在肝脏外科手术中的发展。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜手术19例体会

目的 介绍早期开展经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的经验.方法 回顾性分析从2009年8月28日至12月31日完成经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术11例、经脐单孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗引流术3例及经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术5例的临床资料.结果 19例手术中,除1例经脐单孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗引流术因术中出血而中转开腹,其余均获成功.第1例经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时间为157min,后面的手术时间平均约为70min;经脐单孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗引流术,时间约为50min;经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术时间约为40min.术后无并发症.术后住院时间3～4d,最快1例阑尾术后2d出院.1～3个月后随访,脐部无明显手术瘢痕.结论 经脐单孔腹腔镜技术是微创手术的一个补充,随着手术经验的不断累积、手术器械的不断创新,该手术将会有更大的临床推广价值.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜手术35例初探

目的:总结经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的设备选择及手术适应证.方法:回顾分析2010年6月至2011年4月为35例患者行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的临床资料.结果:35例手术均获成功,19例行经脐单孔胆囊切除术,11例行阑尾切除术,3例行胆囊联合阑尾切除术,2例行精索静脉高位结扎术,术后患者均恢复顺利.结论:经脐单孔腹腔镜手术可使用常规...     

经脐单孔腹腔镜手术102例回顾分析

目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜在普通外科中的应用,总结早期手术经验。方法 回顾性分析2008年8月至2010年8月天津市南开医院经脐单孔腹腔镜手术102例病人的临床资料。结果 在102例病人中,51例行经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术,其中9例因粘连严重中转为三孔法操作（中转率17.65%）;39例行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,其中5例因暴露困难中转为四孔法手术（中转率10.20%）;经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除联合肝囊肿开窗引流术3例,经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除联合阑尾切除术9例,均顺利完成。术后1例病人发现胆总管结石行十二指肠镜取石治疗,2例病人出现胆囊床感染,行腹腔穿刺引流术;无切口感染,无手术相关并发症;术后随访4～24个月,无胆道损伤、出血等并发症。结论 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术安全可行,具有微创、美观、疗效确切等优点,手术操作难度较传统腹腔镜手术高,应谨慎把握手术适应证,由经验丰富的腹腔镜医师开展。     

经脐单孔与多孔法腹腔镜手术治疗贲门失弛缓症及食管裂孔疝的比较研究

目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗贲门失弛缓症及食管裂孔疝的安全性和可行性.方法 2008年1月至2011年12月,行腹腔镜手术治疗贲门失弛缓症及食管裂孔疝患者17例.其中,单孔法组7例,多孔法组10例.收集两组围手术期资料进行比较分析.结果 全部患者均顺利完成腹腔镜手术.单孔组手术时间115 ～ 180 min,出血量50～110ml,术后住院时间5～7d;多孔组手术时间100～ 155 min,出血量40～ 90 ml,住院时间5～9d.所有患者均无术后出血、食管漏、发热感染等并发症发生.单孔组患者术后脐部切口愈合良好,美容效果明显.结论 对于有经验的腹腔镜外科医师,单孔腹腔镜手术治疗贲门失弛缓症及食管裂孔疝是安全可行的,并具有极佳的美容效果.其临床应用价值仍需进一步研究证实.     

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

AIM: To determine the effect of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy(SILC) for colorectal cancer on short-term clinical and oncological outcomes by comparison with multiport conventional laparoscopic colectomy(CLC).METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE for the time period of 2008 to December 2014 to retrieve all relevant literature. The search terms were "laparoscopy", "single incision", "single port", "single site", "SILS", "LESS" and "colorectal cancer". Publications were included if they were randomized controlled trials, case-matched controlled studies, or comparative studies, in which patients underwent single-incision(SILS or LESS) laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Studies were excluded if they were non-comparative, or not including surgery involving the colon or rectum. A total of 15 studies with 589 patients who underwent SILC for colorectal cancer were selected.RESULTS: No significant differences between the groups were noted in terms of mortality or morbidity. The benefit of the SILC approach included reduction in conversion rate to laparotomy, but there were no significant differences in other short-term clinical outcomes between the groups. Satisfactory oncological surgical quality was also demonstrated for SILC for the treatment of colorectal cancer with a similar average lymph node harvest and proximal and distal resection margin length as multiport CLC.CONCLUSION: SILC can be performed safely with similar short-term clinical and oncological outcomes as multiport CLC.     

Hematogenous umbilical metastasis from colon cancer treated by palliative single-incision laparoscopic surgery

Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule (SMJN) is a rare umbilical nodule that develops secondary to metastatic cancer. Primary malignancies are located in the abdomen or pelvis. Patients with SMJN have a poor prognosis. An 83-year-old woman presented to our hospital with a 1-month history of a rapidly enlarging umbilical mass. Endoscopic findings revealed advanced transverse colon cancer. computer tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography revealed tumors of the transverse colon, umbilicus, right inguinal lymph nodes, and left lung. The feeding arteries and drainage veins for the SMJN were the inferior epigastric vessels. Imaging findings of the left lung tumor allowed for identification of the primary lung cancer, and a diagnosis of advanced transverse colon cancer with SMJN and primary lung cancer was made. The patient underwent local resection of the SMNJ and subsequent single-site laparoscopic surgery involving right hemicolectomy and paracolic lymph node dissection. Intra-abdominal dissemination to the mesocolon was confirmed during surgery. Histopathologically, the transverse colon cancer was confirmed to be moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. We suspect that SMJN may occur via a hematogenous pathway. Although chemotherapy for colon cancer and thoracoscopic surgery for the primary lung cancer were scheduled, the patient and her family desired home hospice. Seven months after surgery, she died of rapidly growing lung cancer.     

完全经脐单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术13例报告

目的:探讨完全经脐单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术在基层医院的可行性及技术改进.方法:回顾分析为16例患者施行经脐单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术方法及临床效果,并总结分析国内相关文献.结果:1例因可疑胆囊癌中转开腹,2例因腹腔粘连等因素增加切口完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术.手术时间30~90 min.成功开展的13例术后无出血、胆漏等并发...     

Initial experience in children using conventional laparoscopic instruments in single-incision laparoscopic surgery

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been successfully performed in children using 5-mm reticulating instruments. There are, however, few reports investigating the use of conventional instruments in SILS in the pediatric population.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive children who underwent SILS from October 2009 to January 2010, with the procedure being solely performed by conventional 3- and 5-mm instruments through a standard access technique.

Results

A total of 19 SILS procedures were successfully performed in children aged 3 to 15 years. They included appendectomy (n = 10), nephrectomy (n = 1), combined cholecystectomy and splenectomy (n = 2), cholecystectomy (n = 1), high ligation for varicocele (n = 2), excision of Meckel diverticulum (n = 1), and staged orchidopexy and exploration for impalpable testis (n = 2). There was one conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery, and that occurred in our first case of splenectomy. All the patients had smooth recovery from surgery without complications.

Conclusions

Using conventional instruments in SILS is technically feasible in children from simple to complex procedures and may have the potential to popularize this approach by eliminating the mandatory demand for specially designed instruments.     

New: Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic surgery

Summary  BACKGROUND: On the way to "no-scar" techniques novel single-incision laparoscopic methods are developed, which result in a non-visible postoperative scar. METHODS: A total of 136 patients (age 10–86a; 68f/68m) underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery at our Department for diseases of the appendix, gallbladder, colon, esophagus, liver, adrenal gland, inguinal hernia, or symptomatic adhesions. The entire operations were carried out transumbilically following the standardized procedural principles. RESULTS: Operative time ranged from 17 to 218 min. In 16 patients (11.8%) additional trocars were inserted for procedural safety. No intraoperative adverse event or significant perioperative complication was noticed. Operative estimated blood loss yielded minimal, blood suction was needed only for liver resection and adrenalectomy. Specimen retrieval was carried out either by means of an endo-bag or directly utilizing a transumbilical protection sheet. Patients resumed oral intake at the day of surgery after cholecystectomy, hernia repair or appendectomy, or within 24 h after major surgery according to the principles of fast-track abdominal surgery. Patients' discharge was on postoperative days 1–12 (Mean 3.8 d). At follow-up after 1–4 weeks patients presented with an optimal cosmetic result without apparent scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopy allows further reduction of the surgical trauma and to obviate any visible scar in various procedures.      

Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study

BackgroundSingle incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and single incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) are both advanced minimally invasive operative techniques. However, studies comparing these two surgical methods have not been published. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the short-term outcomes of SIRC with those of SILC.MethodsA total of 21 consecutive patients underwent SIRC and 136 consecutive patients underwent SILC in separate institutes between January 2013 and December 2019. We used retrospective cohort matching to analyze these patients.ResultsPrior to matching, patients who underwent SIRC had a lower percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades III–IV (5% vs. 19%, P = 0.11) compared with patients who underwent SILC. The SIRC group revealed a higher proportion of sigmoid colon lesions and anterior resections than the SILC group (61% vs. 45%, P = 0.16). After 1:4 cohort matching, 21 patients were enrolled in the SIRC group and 84 patients were enrolled in the SILC group. No statistically significant difference in terms of operative time (SIRC: 185 ± 46 min, SILC: 208 ± 53 min; P = 0.51), estimated blood loss (SIRC: 12 ± 22 ml, SILC: 85 ± 234 ml; P = 0.12), and complications (SIRC: 4.7%, SIRC: 7.1%; P = 0.31) was observed between these groups. Length of postoperative hospital stay (SIRC: 8.3 ± 1.7 days, SILC: 9.3 ± 6.5; P = 0.10) and number of harvested lymph nodes (SIRC: 21.3 ± 10.3, SILC: 21.3 ± 9.5; P = 0.77) were also similar between the two groups. In subgroup analysis, numbers of harvested lymph node is less in SIRC than SILC (SIRC: 18.1 ± 4.7 vs. SILC: 18.9 ± 8.1, P = 0.04) in anterior resection.ConclusionSIRC and SILC are safe and feasible procedures with similar surgical and pathological outcomes for right- and left-side colectomy.     

手辅助腹腔镜在右半结肠癌并急性肠梗阻中的应用

目的比较手辅助腹腔镜与开腹在右半结肠癌并急性肠梗阻中的近期疗效。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2015年6月右半结肠癌并急性肠梗阻行根治性右半结肠切除的75例病人的临床病理资料,根据其手术方式分为手辅助腹腔镜手术组(n=34)和开腹手术组(n=41),比较两组的一般资料、手术时间、出血量、切口长度、切口感染率、术后C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)水平、淋巴结数目、肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症。结果手辅助腹腔镜组和开腹手术组基本资料具有可比性(P均0.05),两组间出血量分别为(139.85±53.75)ml和(178.05±75.04)ml、切口长度分别为(6.07±0.64)cm和(17.00±1.78)cm、切口感染率分别为5.88%和24.39%、术后CRP水平分别为(48.82±16.29)mg/L和(87.29±25.00)mg/L、肛门排气时间分别为(5.29±1.03)d和(6.02±1.01)d、术后住院时间分别为(13.62±2.45)d和(16.49±4.79)d,差异具有统计学意义(P均0.05),两组手术时间分别为(205.29±65.02)min和(195.61±45.69)min、淋巴结数目分别为(22.50±5.75)和(20.71±5.65)及术后并发症(吻合口瘘、吻合口出血、腹腔感染)差异无统计学意义(P均0.05)。结论右半结肠癌并急性肠梗阻病人应用手辅助腹腔镜手术创伤小、安全、有效,具有可行性。     

门诊单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用

目的探讨门诊单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术（OPSILC）的安全性、可行性及优势。方法自2008年12月至2010年10月,共完成41例OPSILC,患者的术前检查及手术均在门诊完成,术中在脐周做一个长2-2.5 cm的半圆形切口,将3个5 mm穿刺器分别经该切口穿刺进腹,采用5 mm可调节角度的腹腔镜以及超声刀、可弯曲的腹腔镜手术器械完成手术。结果本组42例患者,OPSILC 41例,中转行常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术1例。OPSILC平均手术时间为52.5 min,平均术中出血量为16.0 ml。术后平均进食流质时间为10.2 h,进食半流质时间为15.5 h。12例于手术当天出院,其余29例于术后第2天出院,平均术后院内观察时间为18.5 h。术后1例切口轻度感染,1例出现尿潴留。术后4周对全部患者进行电话问卷随访,结果显示患者均对OPSILC的美容效果表示满意,总体满意率为98%。结论 OPSILC是安全的、可行的,具有术前不适少、手术切口小、患者满意度高等优点。使用可调节角度的腹腔镜和弯曲的腹腔镜手术器械使OPSILC更简便易行,手术时间也随之缩短。